User talk:Notque: Difference between revisions
Jersey Devil (talk | contribs) Response |
→Adam Smith II: new section |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Just saw your message on my talk page and I just have to say that I am not all that familiar with the historical background of libertarianism so I might not be much of a help in that regard. However if edit warring on that article gets out of hand just tell me and I'll try and take care of it but try and settle any content disputes on the talk page because no one benefits from edit wars. Thanks.--[[User:Jersey Devil|Jersey Devil]] ([[User talk:Jersey Devil|talk]]) 06:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC) |
Just saw your message on my talk page and I just have to say that I am not all that familiar with the historical background of libertarianism so I might not be much of a help in that regard. However if edit warring on that article gets out of hand just tell me and I'll try and take care of it but try and settle any content disputes on the talk page because no one benefits from edit wars. Thanks.--[[User:Jersey Devil|Jersey Devil]] ([[User talk:Jersey Devil|talk]]) 06:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Adam Smith II == |
|||
Q, I just now noticed that you had posted a wonderfully reasoned response to my post. I hadn't looked over there, and was unaware that I had failed to respond. Anyway, I am unable at this time to devote the time necessary to give a response. Unfortunately, the time that I usually compose such discussive comments is the weekend, and ''this'' weekend, I will be without computer access. I really appreciate the time you took to compose your response; I want to mull it over and give your comments as much respect as they deserve by providing a good response on my part. I ''will'' do this, but it could easily be ten days before I can. Until then, all the best. [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] ([[User talk:Unschool|talk]]) 00:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:31, 29 May 2008
I like Toast.
hey! state terrorism by the united states may be of interest to you. best. BernardL 03:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your message and nice recent work on the "politics" page.BernardL 21:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Criticism of Noam Chomsky article
This isn't the first time that this has happened. You might be interested in seeing this. [1] I'll ask User:Cadr to review the issue as he is a linguist familiar with Chomsky's scholarly work. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 08:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
you rock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.105.238 (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm very pleased to be your first personal example of WP:AGF in action :). It was completely obvious that your edits were not vandalism, due in large part to the thoughtful edit summaries you used (and it certainly didn't hurt that you added a whole section of sourced content). Too often people attack those editors they disagree with instead of working together, or even trying to work together. In case you can't tell I'm a big fan of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. And I'm very glad that you are a helpful and reasonable person to deal with; I've had more than a few editors that have tested the limits of my assumption of good faith. Keep up the good work :). -FrankTobia (talk) 00:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey!
Howzit going? Just a quick note to let you know that I am reviewing the situation.BernardL (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Response
Just saw your message on my talk page and I just have to say that I am not all that familiar with the historical background of libertarianism so I might not be much of a help in that regard. However if edit warring on that article gets out of hand just tell me and I'll try and take care of it but try and settle any content disputes on the talk page because no one benefits from edit wars. Thanks.--Jersey Devil (talk) 06:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Adam Smith II
Q, I just now noticed that you had posted a wonderfully reasoned response to my post. I hadn't looked over there, and was unaware that I had failed to respond. Anyway, I am unable at this time to devote the time necessary to give a response. Unfortunately, the time that I usually compose such discussive comments is the weekend, and this weekend, I will be without computer access. I really appreciate the time you took to compose your response; I want to mull it over and give your comments as much respect as they deserve by providing a good response on my part. I will do this, but it could easily be ten days before I can. Until then, all the best. Unschool (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)