Uniqueness quantification: Difference between revisions
m Reverting possible vandalism by 67.87.212.133 to version by Tiddly Tom. False positive? Report it. Thanks, User:ClueBot. (379806) (Bot) |
→Reduction to ordinary existential and universal quantification: add 3rd definition |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
An equivalent definition that has the virtue of separating the notions of existence and uniqueness into two clauses, at the expense of brevity, is |
An equivalent definition that has the virtue of separating the notions of existence and uniqueness into two clauses, at the expense of brevity, is |
||
:<math>\exists x\,P(x) \And \forall y\, \forall z\,(P(y) \And P(z) \to y = z)</math>. |
:<math>\exists x\,P(x) \And \forall y\, \forall z\,(P(y) \And P(z) \to y = z)</math>. |
||
Another equivalent definition with the advantage of brevity is |
|||
:<math>\exists x\,\forall y\,(x = y \leftrightarrow P(x))</math>. |
|||
== Generalizations == |
== Generalizations == |
Revision as of 01:59, 29 May 2008
In mathematics and logic, the phrase "there is one and only one" is used to indicate that exactly one object with a certain property exists. In mathematical logic, this sort of quantification is known as uniqueness quantification or unique existential quantification.
Uniqueness quantification is denoted with the symbol "∃!". For example, the formal statement
may be read aloud as "there is exactly one natural number n such that n - 2 = 4".
Reduction to ordinary existential and universal quantification
Uniqueness quantification can be expressed in terms of the existential and universal quantifiers of predicate logic by defining the formula ∃!x P(x) to mean
- .
An equivalent definition that has the virtue of separating the notions of existence and uniqueness into two clauses, at the expense of brevity, is
- .
Another equivalent definition with the advantage of brevity is
- .
Generalizations
One generalization of uniqueness quantification is counting quantification. This includes both quantification of the form "exactly k objects exist such that ..." as well as "infinitely many objects exist such that ..." and "only finitely many object exist such that...". The first of these forms is expressible using ordinary quantifiers, but the latter two cannot be expressed in ordinary first-order logic.