User talk:Jamesbeat: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Please note I have restored the actor's real name with a very well sourced link. The actor's or studios alleged and unsourced dislike of this fact does NOT allow censorship of an actor's real name. [[User:John celona|John celona]] ([[User talk:John celona|talk]]) 01:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
Please note I have restored the actor's real name with a very well sourced link. The actor's or studios alleged and unsourced dislike of this fact does NOT allow censorship of an actor's real name. [[User:John celona|John celona]] ([[User talk:John celona|talk]]) 01:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Deleting info == |
==Deleting info == |
||
Please note I have deleted the name again. The actor's or studios dislike of publishing real names does allow to be respected. This has nothing to do with censorship but with ethics. Learning from the Johan Paulik case publishing real names of actor's in adult the adult business is immensely helping stalker's. How do you know that the information provided is real and not just a joke? The link was very well in existence when the discussion about the name started and it was not used. You might think about that. [[User talk:Jamesbeat|talk]] |
Please note I have deleted the name again. The actor's or studios dislike of publishing real names does allow to be respected. This has nothing to do with censorship but with ethics. Learning from the Johan Paulik case publishing real names of actor's in adult the adult business is immensely helping stalker's. How do you know that the information provided is real and not just a joke? The link was very well in existence when the discussion about the name started and it was not used. You might think about that. ([[User:Jamesbeat|Jamesbeat]] ([[User talk:Jamesbeat#top|talk]]) 12:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)) |
Revision as of 12:21, 30 May 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Jamesbeat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
I had to remove the information you added to the Rolf Hammerschmidt article since the requirements per WP:BLP state that such controversial information must be sourced by a reliable source.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —meco 08:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Pavel Matous
Another editor has added the {{prod}}
template to the article Pavel Matous, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}}
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Juraj Vrzgula/ridgeston
Please note I have restored the actor's real name with a very well sourced link. The actor's or studios alleged and unsourced dislike of this fact does NOT allow censorship of an actor's real name. John celona (talk) 01:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleting info
Please note I have deleted the name again. The actor's or studios dislike of publishing real names does allow to be respected. This has nothing to do with censorship but with ethics. Learning from the Johan Paulik case publishing real names of actor's in adult the adult business is immensely helping stalker's. How do you know that the information provided is real and not just a joke? The link was very well in existence when the discussion about the name started and it was not used. You might think about that. (Jamesbeat (talk) 12:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC))