User talk:Thetriforcehero: Difference between revisions
EdJohnston (talk | contribs) →May 2008: new section |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for violating the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]]{{#if:| at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Please be more careful to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] or seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] rather than engaging in an [[WP:EW|edit war]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> 3RR violation on [[List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for violating the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]]{{#if:| at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Please be more careful to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] or seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] rather than engaging in an [[WP:EW|edit war]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> 3RR violation on [[List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess]]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|I have not been vandalizing if you look at talk page you will notice that they are swearing like sailors because i dont belive in their fan beliefs also notice that they are going against fringe theroy, Im trying to end their edit war with something that suppots both sides}} |
Revision as of 14:24, 30 May 2008
- Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Mind you, YouTube videos are not considered reliable sources - as you ave already been told ont he article's talk pages. Please read the policy. -- Template:verror2 --> -- ShadowJester07 ►Talk 05:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Protection? This is bad comedy. If you revert the page again, either another user or myself will report the incident to Admins board, and allow them to make an appropriate decision. I strongly suggest listening to the comments left on the TP article's talk page. If you do not understand them, do not change the article, as your edits will likely be seen as vandalism by the other editors. -- ShadowJester07 ►Talk 23:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kariteh (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- ShadowJester07 ►Talk 22:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
3RR violation on List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. EdJohnston (talk) 13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Thetriforcehero (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not been vandalizing if you look at talk page you will notice that they are swearing like sailors because i dont belive in their fan beliefs also notice that they are going against fringe theroy, Im trying to end their edit war with something that suppots both sides |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not been vandalizing if you look at talk page you will notice that they are swearing like sailors because i dont belive in their fan beliefs also notice that they are going against fringe theroy, Im trying to end their edit war with something that suppots both sides |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not been vandalizing if you look at talk page you will notice that they are swearing like sailors because i dont belive in their fan beliefs also notice that they are going against fringe theroy, Im trying to end their edit war with something that suppots both sides |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}