User talk:216.70.26.237: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
{{subst:uw-v2|User talk:RJaguar3}} |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
There has been ample discussion on the topic already. That was not vandalism to the article. There is only one user who persists vandalizing the article by adding un-cited information and air dates, and that's [[User:Sarge100|Sarge100]] who is creating such an upheaval that it appears that more people are against it, but if you look at the talk page, this user is the only one who wants the article to have un-cited information. Please think things through before you accuse people, luckily I'm very perceptive. [[Special:Contributions/216.70.26.237|216.70.26.237]] ([[User talk:216.70.26.237#top|talk]]) 00:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)216.70.26.237 |
There has been ample discussion on the topic already. That was not vandalism to the article. There is only one user who persists vandalizing the article by adding un-cited information and air dates, and that's [[User:Sarge100|Sarge100]] who is creating such an upheaval that it appears that more people are against it, but if you look at the talk page, this user is the only one who wants the article to have un-cited information. Please think things through before you accuse people, luckily I'm very perceptive. [[Special:Contributions/216.70.26.237|216.70.26.237]] ([[User talk:216.70.26.237#top|talk]]) 00:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)216.70.26.237 |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{#if:User talk:RJaguar3|, as you did to [[:User talk:RJaguar3]]}}. Your edits appeared to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> <font face="jokerman">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 21:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:18, 30 May 2008
April 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--† Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 05:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
January 2008
I understand your frustration with the links in One Hundred and One Dalmatians, but your edits also introduced capitalization and spelling errors. Please watch out. --Nlu (talk) 04:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Disney Channel (UK) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to One Hundred and One Dalmatians, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 06:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Your pointless reversal of my Disney Channel page edits
The Disney Channel page before I edited it, was very sloppy. It didn't follow Wikipedia's "Manual of Style" (meaning that all beginning letters in the words in the headlines don't have to be capitalized) and many of the show/film names weren't italicized (for titling purposes). There were also several run on sentences, poorly structured sentences (with the words too close to the periods for instance) and some unsourced information. Frankly, you out to thank me for wanting to clean the page up instead of resorting to knee jerk criticism (without even bothering to thoroughly review the finished product). TMC1982 10:55 p.m., 17 February 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Cartoon Network worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Isaacsf (talk) 21:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cartoon Network, you will be blocked from editing. Isaacsf (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Your edits to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon
Hello. While Wikipedia does encourage users to be bold and edit articles, your edits to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon are construed as edit warring. Please discuss your changes on the talk page rather than reverting the article to your version. Users who continue to revert war may be blocked. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 13:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
There has been ample discussion on the topic already. That was not vandalism to the article. There is only one user who persists vandalizing the article by adding un-cited information and air dates, and that's Sarge100 who is creating such an upheaval that it appears that more people are against it, but if you look at the talk page, this user is the only one who wants the article to have un-cited information. Please think things through before you accuse people, luckily I'm very perceptive. 216.70.26.237 (talk) 00:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)216.70.26.237
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:RJaguar3. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 21:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)