Talk:House Training

---

The synopsis of this episode is taken word for word from: http://www.housemd-guide.com/season3/320training.php doesn't that violate wikipedia's guidelines?

Bonnie

This summery doesn't mention anything about Bonnie and House's intereaction, which was a huge part of the episode both timewise and plot - that's partly why Lupe's case went south. House was too busy prying into Wilson's personal business to pay attention to his team. BethEnd 16:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

The synopsis needs to be rewritten. But.. In almost every episode, House's interfering causes him to be too distracted, thus causing (near) death. ĞavinŤing 17:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Synopsis is wrong

Lupe was not 'working' a scam. She was clearly a dupe of the scam. The fact that she was winning does not mean she was in on it. It means that the scam artist was engendering trust by giving some wins so that he would have the air of legitimacy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.65.116.130 (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC).

The episode is inconclusive as to whether she is a con-artist. The way the card scam usually works is that an accomplice starts the game (and the audiences interest) by "winning" some hands, thereby getting a real punter to put some money in (as is starting to happen with the man at the edge of the crowd just before she collapses). What I was surprised about was that he doesn't make a reappearance in the episode. All the talk of the crack pipe "only taking a few drags" and the mention of her being a scam-artist with her frequent but short jobs, allowing her to qualify for benefits and then quitting. We have to though to with what is on screen - she is never linked directly with the male con-artist apart from being there at the con. The male con-artist though isn't really shown giving any indication he knows her though.Mmm commentaries 21:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:House320.png

Image:House320.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Not the first Dead Patient

They experimented on a baby in the episode maternity(season 1 episode 4) that resulted in a baby's death