Pedophilia: Difference between revisions
Remove study, per talk, and further that the print version does not support asserted facts. |
Googie man (talk | contribs) Added information about cognitive distortions. Sourced with study by the Mayo Clinic and Encylopedia of Pyschology. |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
===Psychopathology and cognitive distortions=== |
===Psychopathology and cognitive distortions=== |
||
Pedophiles have impaired interpersonal functioning and elevated passive-aggressiveness, as well as impaired self-concept. Regarding disinhibitory traits, pedophiles demonstrate elevated sociopathy and propensity for cognitive distortions. Pathologic personality traits in pedophiles and lend support to a hypothesis that such pathology is related to both motivation for and failure to inhibit pedophilic behavior.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Personality impairment in male pedophiles|author= Cohen LJ, McGeoch PG, Watras-Gans S, Acker S, Poznansky O, Cullen K, Itskovich Y, Galynker I.|journal=J Clin Psychiatry|date=2002 Oct;|volume=63|issue=(10):|pmid=: 12416601|pages=912–9}}</ref> A review of qualitative research studies published between 1982 and 2001 revealed that pedophiles use cognitive distortions to meet personal needs. They justify abuse by making excuses, redefining their actions as love and mutuality, and exploiting the power imbalance inherent in all adult-child relationships.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Isolation, gratification, justification: offenders' explanations of child molesting|author= Lawson L.|journal=Issues Ment Health Nurs|date=2003 Sep-Nov;|issue=24|volume=(6-7):|pmid=: 12907384|pages=695–705}}</ref> Other cognitive distortions include the idea of "children as sexual beings," "uncontrollability of sexuality," and "sexual entitlement-bias."<ref>{{cite journal|title=Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending|author= Mihailides S, Devilly GJ, Ward T.|journal=Sex Abuse|date=2004 Oct|volume=16|issue=(4):|pmid=: 15560415|pages=333–50}}</ref> |
Pedophiles have impaired interpersonal functioning and elevated passive-aggressiveness, as well as impaired self-concept. Regarding disinhibitory traits, pedophiles demonstrate elevated sociopathy and propensity for cognitive distortions. Pathologic personality traits in pedophiles and lend support to a hypothesis that such pathology is related to both motivation for and failure to inhibit pedophilic behavior.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Personality impairment in male pedophiles|author= Cohen LJ, McGeoch PG, Watras-Gans S, Acker S, Poznansky O, Cullen K, Itskovich Y, Galynker I.|journal=J Clin Psychiatry|date=2002 Oct;|volume=63|issue=(10):|pmid=: 12416601|pages=912–9}}</ref> A review of qualitative research studies published between 1982 and 2001 revealed that pedophiles use cognitive distortions to meet personal needs. They justify abuse by making excuses, redefining their actions as love and mutuality, and exploiting the power imbalance inherent in all adult-child relationships.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Isolation, gratification, justification: offenders' explanations of child molesting|author= Lawson L.|journal=Issues Ment Health Nurs|date=2003 Sep-Nov;|issue=24|volume=(6-7):|pmid=: 12907384|pages=695–705}}</ref> Other cognitive distortions include the idea of "children as sexual beings," "uncontrollability of sexuality," and "sexual entitlement-bias."<ref>{{cite journal|title=Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending|author= Mihailides S, Devilly GJ, Ward T.|journal=Sex Abuse|date=2004 Oct|volume=16|issue=(4):|pmid=: 15560415|pages=333–50}}</ref> |
||
A United States Department of Justice manual lists five of these common psychological defenses commonly used by pedophiles to justify their actions. 1) Denial(is it wrong to hug a child?), 2) Minimization (it only happened once), 3) Justification (I'm a boy lover, not a child molester), 4) Fabrication (activities were for a scholarly research project), and 5) Attack (character attacks on child, accusers, and others.) |
|||
<ref>Mayo Clinic Procedings "A Profile of Pedophilia"[http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/pdf/8204/8204sa.pdf Mayo Clinic Procedings] Accessed [[June 2]], [[2008]]</ref> |
|||
These defense mechanisms reflect one of the most salient features of the condition. Cognitive distortions are a hallmark feature of the pedophilia, used to maximize the pedophiles subjective self-regard, justify their thoughts and behavior, but rarely have basis in objective reality as they're entirely self-serving. This form of denial is one of the reasons why many pedophiles fail to recognize the true harm that they may cause, as most pedophiles act for their own gratification, but will rationalize their actions as for the good of the child.<ref>Encyclopedia of Psychology "Pedophilia" [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_g2699/is_0005/ai_2699000576/pg_1]</ref> |
|||
==Prevalence== |
==Prevalence== |
Revision as of 05:20, 3 June 2008
The term pedophilia or paedophilia has a range of definitions as found in common usage, psychology, and law enforcement. As a medical diagnosis, it is defined as a psychological disorder in which an adult experiences a sexual preference for prepubescent children[1][2][3][4] and may engage in child sexual abuse, also known as "pedophilic behavior".[5][6][7][8][9] According to the DSM, pedophilia is a form of paraphilia in which a person either has acted on intense sexual urges towards children, or has sexual urges towards and fantasies about children that cause distress or interpersonal difficulty.[10]
In common usage, the term pedophile or paedophile refers to an adult who is sexually attracted to children, whether or not the adult acts upon that attraction by sexually abusing a child.[11][5] In law enforcement, the term "pedophile" is generally used to describe those accused or convicted of child sexual abuse under sociolegal definitions of child (including both prepubescent children and adolescents younger than the local age of consent);[12] as can be seen for example in the name of the United Kingdom police agency, the Paedophile Unit. Some researchers have described this usage as improper and suggested it can confound two separate types of offenders, child molesters and rapists, thereby obscuring results of ongoing research.[2][12]
The causes of pedophilia have not been determined, though there are a variety of theories ranging from biological to psychological, and research is ongoing.[13] Most pedophiles are men.[9] In psychology and law enforcement, there have been a variety of typologies suggested to categorize pedophiles according to behavior and motivations.[14] There is no known treatment or cure for pedophilia, however there are therapies that can reduce the incidence of pedophilic behaviors that result in child sexual abuse.[15][8]
History of the term
The word comes from the Greek paidophilia (παιδοφιλία): pais (παις, "child") and philia (φιλία, "love, friendship"). Paidophilia was coined by Greek poets either as a substitute for "paiderastia" (pederasty),[16] or vice versa.[17]
The classic Latinized spelling is with ae or æ, to avoid confusion with pedophilia, which etymologically means attraction to the ground (πέδον). The term should also not be confused with podophilia either, which is attraction to feet (πούς > octopus / ποδός / πηδόν > pedal).
Today the American (among others) pronunciation has changed into the more germanic English form using the "ped" as in "pediatrician," not as in "pedestrian" despite the fact the original Greek spelling contained an ai, which is pronounced as in "eye".[18] English has not fully developed the sounds of the vowels in the original form due to the phonetics of the vastly different languages. The correct terminology of the modern word Paedophile uses the ae or æ, which is the Latinized form of the Greek original, this happened a lot in the adoption of more of the classical languages into modern English and other European languages as detailed below.
The term paedophilia erotica was coined in 1886 by the Viennese psychiatrist Richard von Krafft-Ebing in his writing Psychopathia Sexualis.[19] He gave the following characteristics:
- The sexual interest is toward pre-pubescent youths only. This interest does not extend to the first signs of pubic hair.
- The sexual interest is toward pre-pubescent youths only and does not include teenagers.
- The sexual interest remains over time.
As people who have this interest would include many adolescents and pre-pubescents, some experts who theorize that attraction to minors is more common among youth, specify that the interest must be toward pre-pubescent youths at least five years younger than the subject.
Adults sexually attracted to pre-pubescent youths were placed into three categories by Krafft-Ebing:
- a.) pedophile
- b.) surrogate (that is, the pre-pubescent youths are regarded as a substitute object for a preferred, non-available adult object)
- c.) sadistic
Other researchers used their own terms for the Krafft-Ebing categories:
- a.) preferential/structured/fixed (i. e. pedophile) type,
- b.) situational/opportunistic/regressed/incest (i. e. surrogate) type
- c.) sadistic (no change)
This three-type model as well as the fundamental mental and behavioural differences of the three types were empirically evidenced, among others, by Kinsey; Howells 1981;[20] Abel, Mittleman & Becker 1985;[21] Knight et al. 1985;[22] McConaghy 1993;[23] Ward et al. 1995;[24] Hoffmann 1996;[25] Seikowski 1999.[26]
Diagnosis
The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (F65.4) defines pedophilia as "a sexual preference for children, boys or girls or both, usually of prepubertal or early pubertal age."[1]
The APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition, Text Revision gives the following as its "Diagnostic criteria for 302.2 Pedophilia":[27][28]
- A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger);
- B. The person has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty;
- C. The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.
Neither the ICD or the APA diagnostic criteria require actual sexual activity with a pre-pubescent youths. The diagnosis can therefore be made based on the presence of fantasies or sexual urges alone, provided the subject meets the remaining criteria. "For individuals in late adolescence with pedophilia, no precise age difference is specified, and clinical judgment must be used" (p. 527 DSM).[28]
Nepiophilia, also called infantophilia, is used to refer to a sexual preference for toddlers and infants (usually ages 0–3).[29]
Etiology
The cause or causes of pedophilia are not known.[13] The experience of sexual abuse as a child was previously thought to be a strong risk factor, but research does not show a causal relationship, as the vast majority of sexually abused children do not grow up to be adult offenders, nor do the majority of adult offenders report childhood sexual abuse. The US Government Accountability Office concluded, "the existence of a cycle of sexual abuse was not established." Prior to 1996, there was greater belief in the theory of a "cycle of violence," because most of the research done was retrospective—abusers were asked if they had experienced past abuse. Even the majority of studies found that most adult sex offenders said they had not been sexually abused during childhood, but studies varied in terms of their estimates of the percentage of such offenders who had been abused, from 0 to 79 percent. More recent prospective longitudinal research—studying children with documented cases of sexual abuse over time to determine what percentage become adult offenders—has demonstrated that the cycle of violence theory is not an adequate explanation for why people molest children.[30]
Biological findings
Several researchers have reported correlations between pedophilia and certain psychological characteristics, such as low self-esteem[31][32] and poor social skills.[33] Until recently, many pedophilia researchers believed that pedophilia was actually caused by those characteristics. Beginning in 2002, other researchers, most notably Canadian sexologists James Cantor and Ray Blanchard and their colleagues, began reporting a series of findings linking pedophilia with brain structure and function: Pedophilic (and hebephilic) men have lower IQs,[34][35][4] poorer scores on memory tests,[34] greater rates of non-right-handedness,[34][4][36][37] greater rates of school grade failure over and above the IQ differences,[38], lesser physical height,[39] and several differences in MRI-detected brain structures.[40][41][42] These recent findings suggest that there are one or more neurological characteristics present at birth that cause or increase the likelihood of being pedophilic and that the psychological characteristics are results rather than causes of pedophilia. That is, knowing that one is pedophilic lowers one’s self esteem, etc. Because these biology-related findings are still new, conventional theorists have not yet provided opinions on how best to interpret them. Evidence of familial transmittability "suggests, but does not prove that genetic factors are responsible" for the development of pedophilia.[43]
Several recent studies concern possible connections between pedophilic attraction and or behavior and neurobiology. Pedophilic men have lower IQs than nonpedophilic men.[44][45] Pedophilic men have three times greater odds of being non-right-handed, suggesting that their brains had a different organization before or near birth.[46] Additionally, there is research correlating "pedophilic" and "hebephilic" sex offending with lack of height, suggesting that there may be a biological or pre-natal cause related to physical development.[47] Another study, using structural MRI, shows that pedophlic men have a lower volume of white matter than non-sexual criminals.[48]
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown that child molesters diagnosed with pedophilia have reduced activation of the hypothalamus as compared with non-pedophilic individuals when viewing sexually arousing pictures of adults.[49] A 2008 functional neuroimaging study notes that central processing of sexual stimuli in heterosexual "paedophile forensic inpatients" may be altered by a disturbance in the prefrontal networks, which "may be associated with stimulus-controlled behaviours, such as sexual compulsive behaviours." The findings may also suggest "a dysfunction at the cognitive stage of sexual arousal processing."[50]
While not causes of pedophilia itself, comorbid psychiatric illness--such as personality disorders and substance abuse--are risk factors for acting on pedophilic urges.[8]
Psychopathology and cognitive distortions
Pedophiles have impaired interpersonal functioning and elevated passive-aggressiveness, as well as impaired self-concept. Regarding disinhibitory traits, pedophiles demonstrate elevated sociopathy and propensity for cognitive distortions. Pathologic personality traits in pedophiles and lend support to a hypothesis that such pathology is related to both motivation for and failure to inhibit pedophilic behavior.[51] A review of qualitative research studies published between 1982 and 2001 revealed that pedophiles use cognitive distortions to meet personal needs. They justify abuse by making excuses, redefining their actions as love and mutuality, and exploiting the power imbalance inherent in all adult-child relationships.[52] Other cognitive distortions include the idea of "children as sexual beings," "uncontrollability of sexuality," and "sexual entitlement-bias."[53]
A United States Department of Justice manual lists five of these common psychological defenses commonly used by pedophiles to justify their actions. 1) Denial(is it wrong to hug a child?), 2) Minimization (it only happened once), 3) Justification (I'm a boy lover, not a child molester), 4) Fabrication (activities were for a scholarly research project), and 5) Attack (character attacks on child, accusers, and others.) [54]
These defense mechanisms reflect one of the most salient features of the condition. Cognitive distortions are a hallmark feature of the pedophilia, used to maximize the pedophiles subjective self-regard, justify their thoughts and behavior, but rarely have basis in objective reality as they're entirely self-serving. This form of denial is one of the reasons why many pedophiles fail to recognize the true harm that they may cause, as most pedophiles act for their own gratification, but will rationalize their actions as for the good of the child.[55]
Prevalence
In 1989 Briere and Runtz conducted a study on 193 male undergraduate students concerning pedophilia. Of the sample, 21 percent acknowledged sexual attraction to some small children; nine percent reported sexual fantasies involving children; five percent admitted masturbating to these fantasies; and seven percent conceded some probability of actually having sex with a child if they could avoid detection and punishment. The authors also noted that "given the probable social undesirability of such admissions, [one could] hypothesize that the actual rates ... were even higher."[56]
An NHK investigation in Japan surveyed 3600 subjects aged 16 to 69 about having sex with a partner under 13. Among males that answered "I would like to" were 6% of respondents under 20, 5% of respondents in their 20s, 4% of respondents in their 30s, 1% of respondents in their 40s, 8% of respondents in their 50s, and 0% of respondents in their 60s. For females the rate was near 0% in all demographics, except the under 20 group, in which 2% answered positively.[57]
Comparatively little research is available regarding pedophilia's occurrence in females.[58] In a 1996 study of a university sample, 2.6 percent of surveyed females self-reported at least some sexual interest in children.[59]
Some studies have concluded that at least a quarter of all adult men may have some feelings of sexual arousal in connection with pre-pubescent youths.[60]
Prevalence among child sex offenders
A behavioral analysis report by the FBI states that most child molesters in general are pedophiles, and in particular, "A high percentage of acquaintance child molesters are preferential sex offenders who have a true sexual preference for children (i.e., pedophiles)."[14] According to the Mayo Clinic, approximately 95% of child sexual abuse incidents are committed by the 88% of child molestation offenders who meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia;[61] and pedophilic child molestors commit ten times more sexual acts against children than non-pedophilic child molestors.[61] On the other hand, in papers by Paul Okami and Amy Goldberg (1992), and Kevin Howells (1981), the authors stated that most data they had reviewed suggests that pedophiles make up a minority of incarcerated child sex offenders.[62][63]
The term pedophile is commonly used to describe all child sexual offenders, including those who do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards. This use is seen as problematic by some people.[64][65] Some researchers, such as Howard E. Barbaree,[66] have endorsed the use of actions as a sole criterion for the diagnosis of pedophilia as a means of taxonomic simplification, rebuking the American Psychiatric Association's standards as "unsatisfactory". Child sexual abuse, whether perpetrated by a clinically diagnosed pedophile or not, is illegal. According to the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers,
"Although virtually all pedophiles are child molesters, not all child molesters are pedophiles. Pedophiles are men with a clear sexual preference for children rather than adults. Child molesters are described as individuals who have committed a sexual offense against a child victim. There are, however, no 'pure' types, and offenders are best conceptualized as closer to one end of the continuum or the other."[67]
A perpetrator of child sexual abuse is commonly assumed to be and referred to as a pedophile; however, there may be other motivations for the crime[66] (such as stress, marital problems, or the unavailability of an adult partner),[68] Child sexual abuse may or may not be an indicator that its perpetrator is a pedophile; or a subtype of pedophile. Many terms have been used to disntiguish "true pedophiles" from nonpedophilic offenders, or to distinguish among types of pedophiles on a continuum according to strength and exclusivity of pedophilic interest. Some of the terms used to describe incest offenders are regressed, situational, and intrafamilial.
A review article in the British Journal of Psychiatry notes the overlap between extrafamilial and intrafamilial offenders:
Incest and paedophilia: Originally, the legal definition of incest applied to vaginal intercourse between a male and female whom the offender knew to be his daughter, granddaughter, sister or mother — and did not include stepfathers or adoptive fathers or actions other than vaginal intercourse (Smith & Bentovim, 1994). In clinical practice, the definition has been modified by including sexual contact which occurred within the nuclear family, giving rise to the dichotomy of intrafamilial abuse (incest) and extrafamilial abuse (paedophilia). Consequently, there was confusion about sexual abuse by stepparents and adoptive parent abusers. Paedophilia has been defined as a "perversion in which an adult has a sexual interest in children with paedophiliacs having certain fundamental features in common" (Glasser, 1990). However, just as incest does not imply homogeneity neither does paedophilia, and ambiguity in this term can lead to differences in usage. Another long-held belief is that incest and paedophile offenders are distinct (Cooper & Cormier, 1990; Glasser, 1990), together with an associated tendency to support community-based treatment for the incest offender but to view the paedophile as more dangerous. Conte (1991) contests this belief on the basis that about half of fathers and stepfathers, referred for treatment at clinics for having abused children outside the home, had at the same time been abusing their own children (Abel et al, 1988).[69]
As noted by Abel, Mittleman, and Becker[70] (1985) and Ward et al. (1995), there are generally large distinctions between the two types of offenders' characteristics. Situational offenders tend to offend at times of stress; have a later onset of offending; have fewer, often familial victims; and have a general preference for adult partners. Pedophilic offenders, however, often start offending at an early age; often have a large number of victims who are frequently extrafamilial; are more inwardly driven to offend; and have values or beliefs that strongly support an offense lifestyle. Research suggests that incest offenders recidivate at approximately half the rate of extrafamilial child molesters, and one study estimated that by the time of entry to treatment, nonincestuous pedophiles who molest boys had committed an average of 282 offenses against 150 victims.[71]
Treatment
Although pedophilia is a chronic condition that has no cure at this time, various treatments are available that can help to reduce or prevent the expression of pedophilic behavior, thereby reducing the prevalence of child sexual abuse.[72][15] Treatment of pedophilia is considered a form of primary prevention and often requires collaboration between law enforcement and health care professionals.[15][8]
A number of proposed treatment techniques for pedophilia have been developed. In 1981, writer David Crawford reported that the success rate of these therapies was very low.[73] Dr. Fred Berlin, founder of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic, believed pedophilia could "indeed be successfully treated," if only the medical community would give it more attention.[74]
Some psychologists,[75] such as Dr. Fred S. Berlin, assert sexual attraction to pre-pubescent youths to be a sexual orientation in itself, but Berlin also states "The psychiatric profession still correctly considers pedophilia to be a mental disorder." [76][74][76] In one article, Berlin writes "it is likely that no one would choose voluntarily to develop a pedophilic sexual orientation. Those with such an orientation have no more decided to have it than have any of us decided as children to be either heterosexual or homosexual."[77] Berlin also defends the classification of pedophilia as a mental disorder, however, stating "In our society, to have a pedophilic sexual orientation can create both psychological burdens and impairments."[77]
Medical therapies
Behavior modification programs have been shown to reduce recidivism in contact sex offenders.[78] Often such programs use principles of applied behavior analysis such as the use of reward and punishment to train new behavior such as problem solving.[79] Many of the programs use covert sensitization[80] and odor aversion, which are both forms of aversion therapy. While such programs are effective in lowering recidivism by 15-18 percent, they do not represent a cure. A study by the Council on Scientific Affairs found that the success rate of aversion therapy was parallel to that of homosexual reparative therapy; that is to say, extremely low.[81] This method is rarely used on pedophiles who have not offended.
Anti-androgenic medications such as Depo Provera may be used to lower testosterone levels in offending pedophiles. These treatments, commonly referred to as "chemical castration", are often used in conjunction with the non-medical approaches noted above. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues, which last longer and have less side effects, are also effective in reducing libido and may be used.[82]
Klaus M. Beier of the Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine at Charité , a university hospital in Berlin, reported success in a preliminary study using role-play therapy and "impulse-curbing drugs" to help pedophiles avoid sexually assaulting a child. According to researchers, contact child sex offenders were better able to control their urges once they understood the pre-pubescent youth's view.[83][84] Although these results are relevant to the prevention of re-offending in contact child sex offenders, there is no empirical suggestion that such therapy is a cure for pedophilia.
Pedophilia-related activism
Pro-pedophile activism
Some pro-pedophile activists aim to change legal, medical and social views of pedophilia. The highly controversial Rind et al. study has been quoted by numerous pedophile advocacy organizations.[85][86][87]
Anti-pedophile activism
Anti-pedophile activism encompasses opposition to pedophiles, pro-pedophile activism, and other phenomena that are seen as related to pedophilia, such as child pornography and child sexual abuse.[88] Whilst much of the direct action classified as anti-pedophile involves demonstrations against sex offenders[89], groups advocating legalization of sexual activity between adults and children,[90] and internet users who solicit sex from teens, there are some organizations, such as Absolute Zero,[91] that explicitly target pedophiles.
See also
Notes and references
Notes
- ^ a b World Health Organization, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: ICD-10 Section F65.4: Paedophilia (online access via ICD-10 site map table of contents)
- ^ a b Okami, P. & Goldberg, A. (1992) "Personality correlates of pedophilia: Are they reliable indicators?," Journal of Sex Research, 29, 297-328. Cite error: The named reference "okami" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Freund, K. (1981). Assessment of pedophilia. In M. Cook & K. Howells (Eds.), Adult sexual interest in children (pp. 139–179). London: Academic.
- ^ a b c Blanchard, R., Kolla, N. J., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2007). IQ, handedness, and pedophilia in adult male patients stratified by referral source. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 285-309.
- ^ a b ""pedophilia" (n.d.)". The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary. May 06, 2008.
The act or fantasy on the part of an adult of engaging in sexual activity with a child or children.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Finkelhor, David (1986). A Sourcebook on Child Sexual Abuse: Sourcebook on Child Sexual Abuse. Sage Publications. pp. p90. ISBN 0803927495.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Burgess, Ann Wolbert (1978). Sexual Assault of Children and Adolescents. Lexington Books. pp. p9-10, 24, 40. ISBN 0669018929.
the sexual misuse and abuse of children constitutes pedophilia
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b c d Fagan, P.J.; et al. "Pedophilia". Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002 Nov 20, 288(19):2458-65.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|last=
(help) - ^ a b "pedophilia". Encyclopædia Britannica.
- ^ medem.com
- ^ ""pedophile" (n.d.)". The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. May 06, 2008.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ a b Ames, MA. "Legal, social, and biological definitions of pedophilia". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1990 Aug, 19(4):333-42.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b ""Pedophilia"". Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers, LLC. 07 Sept 2006.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ a b Lanning, Kenneth (2001). "Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis (Third Edition)" (PDF). National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. pp. p25, 27, 29.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b c Fuller, AK. "Child molestation and pedophilia. An overview for the physician". Journal of the American Medical Association. 1989 Jan 27, 261(4):602-6.
- ^ Liddell, H.G., and Scott, Robert (1959). Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon. ISBN 0-19-910206-6.
- ^ Anonymous (probably Geigel, Alois. 1869) Das Paradoxon der Venus Urania ("The paradox of man-manly love"), p. 6. OCLC 68582227 OCLC 77768935 Reprinted as a complete facsimile in Hohmann, Joachim S. (1977). Der unterdrückte Sexus ("Historical oppression of sexuality"). ISBN 3879587124 Template:De icon. The anonymous 1869 author had harshly rejected the theories of early LGBT activist Karl Heinrich Ulrichs whose "filthy pederasty" he contrasted with chaste, "sublime paedophilia" basing both definitions on the classical meaning boy for παις instead of the non-classical meaning child, and εραστια ("erastia") as pure "sexual desire", contrasted with more sublime φιλία.
- ^ greeklatinaudio.com additional information
- ^ Krafft-Ebing, Richard von (1886). Psychopathia Sexualis. English translation: ISBN 1-55970-425-X.
- ^ Howells, K. (1981). "Adult sexual interest in children: Considerations relevant to theories of aetiology," Adult sexual interest in children, 55-94.
- ^ Abel, G. G., Mittleman, M. S., & Becker, J. V. (1985). "Sex offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment." In M. H. Ben-Aron, S. J. Hucker, & C. D. Webster (Eds.), Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behavior (pp. 207-220). Toronto, Canada: M & M Graphics.
- ^ Knight, R.; Rosenberg, R.; Schneider, B. (1985). "Classification of sex offenders: Perspectives, methods, and validation" In A. W. Burgess (Ed.) Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook (pp. 222-293). New York: Garland.
- ^ McConaghy, Nathaniel (1993). "Sexual Behaviour: Problems and Management", 312, New York: Plenum
- ^ Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Marshall, W. L., & Siegert, R. J. (1995). "Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework." In Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 317-334.
- ^ Hoffmann, R. (1996). "Die Lebenswelt des Pädophilen: Rahmen, Rituale und Dramaturgie der pädophilen Begegnung" (Paedophile conduct: Context, rituals, and choreography of paedophile contacts). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag Template:De icon
- ^ Seikowski, K. (1999). "Pädophilie: Definition, Abgrenzung und Entwicklungsbedingungen" ("Paedophilia: Definition, distinguishing features, and aetiology") In Sexualmedizin 21, pp. 327-332 Template:De icon
- ^ "DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR PEDOPHILIA" (PDF). APA STATEMENT. American Psychiatric Association. June 17, 2003.
- ^ a b Pedophilia DSM at the Medem Online Medical Library
- ^ Laws, D. Richard (2008). Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. Guilford Press. pp. p176. ISBN 1593856059.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ E L Rezmovic ; D Sloane ; D Alexander ; B Seltser ; T Jessor (1996). "Cycle of Sexual Abuse: Research Inconclusive About Whether Child Victims Become Adult Abusers" (PDF). US Government Accountability Office General Government Division United States.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Marshall, W. L. (1997). The relationship between self-esteem and deviant sexual arousal in nonfamilial child molesters. Behavior Modification, 21, 86–96.
- ^ Marshall, W., L., Cripps, E., Anderson, D., & Cortoni, F. A. (1999). Self-esteem and coping strategies in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 955–962.
- ^ Emmers-Sommer, T. M., Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Sahlstein, E., Laskowski, K., Falato, W. L., et al. (2004). A meta-analysis of the relationship between social skills and sexual offenders. Communication Reports, 17, 1–10.
- ^ a b c Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Christensen, B. K., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., Beckstead, A. L., Blak, T., & Kuban, M. E. (2004). Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology, 18, 3–14.
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Robichaud, L. K., & Christensen, B. K. (2005). Quantitative reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 555–568.
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Williams, N. S., & Blanchard, R. (2005). Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 447–459.
- ^ Bogaert, A. F. (2001). Handedness, criminality, and sexual offending. Neuropsychologia, 39, 465–469.
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2006). Grade failure and special education placement in sexual offenders’ educational histories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 743–751.
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Physical height in pedophilia and hebephilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 395–407.
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Kabani, N., Christensen, B. K., Zipursky, R. B., Barbaree, H. E., Dickey, R., Klassen, P. E., Mikulis, D. J., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Richards, B. A., Hanratty, M. K., & Blanchard, R. (2008). Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42, 167–183.
- ^ Schiffer, B., Peschel, T., Paul, T., Gizewski, E., Forsting, M., Leygraf, N., Schedlowski, M., Krueger, T. H. C. (2007). Structural brain abnormalities in the frontostriatal system and cerebellum in pedophilia. 'Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41, 753–762
- ^ Schiltz, K., Witzel, J., Northoff, G., Zierhut, K., Gubka, U., Fellman, H., Kaufmann, J., Tempelmann, C., Wiebking, C., & Bogerts, B. (2007). Brain pathology in pedophilic offenders: Evidence of volume reduction in the right amygdala and related diencephalic structures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 737–746.
- ^ Is there familial transmission of pedophilia? [J Nerv Ment Dis. 1984] - PubMed Result
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R., Robichaud, L. K., & Christensen, B. K. (2005). Quantitative reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 555–568.
- ^ Blanchard, Ray; Kolla, Nathan J.; Cantor, James M.; Klassen, Philip E.; Dickey, Robert; Kuban, Michael E.; and Blak, Thomas (2007). IQ, Handedness, and Pedophilia in Adult Male Patients Stratified by Referral Source, Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(3), 285-309.
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Christensen, B. K., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Williams, N. S., & Blanchard, R. (2005). Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34, 447–459.
- ^ Cantor, J. M., Kuban, M. E., Blak, T., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Physical height in pedophilia and hebephilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 395–407.
- ^ Cantor JM, Kabani N, Christensen BK, Zipursky RB, Barbaree HE, Dickey R, Klassen PE, Mikulis DJ, Kuban ME, Blak T, Richards BA, Hanratty MK, Blanchard R (2008). "Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men". J Psychiatr Res. 42 ((3):): 167–83. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.10.013. PMID 18039544 : 18039544.
{{cite journal}}
: Check|pmid=
value (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Walter et al. (2007). "Pedophilia Is Linked to Reduced Activation in Hypothalamus and Lateral Prefrontal Cortex During Visual Erotic Stimulation." Biological Psychiatry. 62.
- ^ Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, Kruger TH (2008). "Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia". Neuroimage. 41 (1): 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.008. PMID 18358744 : 18358744.
{{cite journal}}
: Check|pmid=
value (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Cohen LJ, McGeoch PG, Watras-Gans S, Acker S, Poznansky O, Cullen K, Itskovich Y, Galynker I. (2002 Oct;). "Personality impairment in male pedophiles". J Clin Psychiatry. 63 ((10):): 912–9. PMID 12416601 : 12416601.
{{cite journal}}
: Check|pmid=
value (help); Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Lawson L. (2003 Sep-Nov;). "Isolation, gratification, justification: offenders' explanations of child molesting". Issues Ment Health Nurs. (6-7): (24): 695–705. PMID 12907384 : 12907384.
{{cite journal}}
: Check|pmid=
value (help); Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ Mihailides S, Devilly GJ, Ward T. (2004 Oct). "Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending". Sex Abuse. 16 ((4):): 333–50. PMID 15560415 : 15560415.
{{cite journal}}
: Check|pmid=
value (help); Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Mayo Clinic Procedings "A Profile of Pedophilia"Mayo Clinic Procedings Accessed June 2, 2008
- ^ Encyclopedia of Psychology "Pedophilia" [1]
- ^ University males' sexual interest in children: predicting potential indices of "pedophilia" in a nonforensic sample." Child Abuse & Neglect, 13 (1), 65-67.]
- ^ Nipponjin no Seikōdō Seiishiki, Tokyo: Nippon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai, 2002, ISBN 4140092947
- ^ Marina Knopf (1994). "Sexual Contacts Between Women and Children," Paidika, Vol.3, No.3
- ^ Smiljanich, K. & Briere, J. (1996). "Self-reported sexual interest in children: Sex differences and psychosocial correlates in a university sample," Violence & Victims, vol. 11, no. 1, 1996, pp. 39-50.
- ^ Freund, K. and Costell, R. (1970). "The structure of erotic preference in the nondeviant male." Behaviour Research & Therapy 8 (1), 15-20.
Quinsey, V. L. et al. (1975). "Penile circumference, skin conductance, and ranking responses of child molesters and 'normals' to sexual and nonsexual visual stimuli." Behavior Therapy. 6, 213-219. - ^ a b HALL, MD, RYAN C. W. "A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues" (PDF). MAYO CLIN PROC. 82:457-471 2007. MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Okami, P. & Goldberg, A. (1992) "Personality correlates of pedophilia: Are they reliable indicators?," Journal of Sex Research, 29, 297-328. "This is a particularly important point because most data suggest that only a relatively small portion of the population of incarcerated sexual offenders against minors consists of persons for whom minors (particularly children) represent the exclusive or even primary object of sexual interest or source of arousal."
- ^ Howells, K. (1981). "Adult sexual interest in children: Considerations relevant to theories of aetiology," in Cook, M. & Howells, K. (eds.), Adult sexual interest in children, 55-94.
- ^ Edwards, M. (1997) "Treatment for Paedophiles; Treatment for Sex Offenders." Paedophile Policy and Prevention, Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series (12), 74-75.
- ^ Feierman, J. (1990). "Introduction" and "A Biosocial Overview," Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions, 1-68.
- ^ a b Barbaree, H. E., and Seto, M. C. (1997). Pedophilia: Assessment and Treatment. Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. 175-193.
- ^ "FACTS ABOUT ADULT SEX OFFENDERS". Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. 2001.
- ^ Howells, K. (1981). "Adult sexual interest in children: Considerations relevant to theories of aetiology," Adult sexual interest in children. 55-94.
- ^ M. GLASSER, FRCPsych and I. KOLVIN, FRCPsych (2001). "Cycle of child sexual abuse: links between being a victim and becoming a perpetrator". British Journal of Psychiatry.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Abel, G. G., Mittleman, M. S., & Becker, J. V. (1985). "Sex offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment." In M. H. Ben-Aron, S. J. Hucker, & C. D. Webster (Eds.), Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behavior (pp. 207-220). Toronto, Canada: M & M Graphics.
- ^ Linda S. Grossman, Ph.D., Brian Martis, M.D. and Christopher G. Fichtner, M.D. (1999). "Are Sex Offenders Treatable? A Research Overview": 349–361work=Psychiatr Serv. PMID 10096639.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help); Unknown parameter|vol=
ignored (|volume=
suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Public Policy
- ^ Crawford, David (1981). "Treatment approaches with pedophiles." Adult sexual interest in children. 181-217.
- ^ a b Edwards, Douglas J. (2004). Mental Health's Cold Shoulder Treatment of Pedophilia in Behavioral Health Management, May-June.
- ^ Musk, H., and Swetz, A. (1997). Pedophilia in the correctional system; Corrections Today, 59(5), 24–28. "Pedophilia is a sexual orientation characterized by sexual attraction to children."
- ^ a b Treatments to Change Sexual Orientation - BERLIN 157 (5): 838 - Am J Psychiatry
- ^ a b Berlin, M.D., Ph.D., =Fred S. (December 2002). "Peer Commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002) - Pedophilia: When Is a Difference a Disorder?" (PDF). Archives of Sexual Behavior. 31 (6): 479–480. doi:10.1023/A:1020603214218.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: year (link) - ^ Marshall, W.L., Jones, R., Ward, T., Johnston, P. & Bambaree, H.E.(1991). Treatment of sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 465-485
- ^ Maguth Nezu, C., Fiore, A.A. & Nezu, A.M (2006). Problem Solving Treatment for Intellectually Disabled Sex Offenders. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 2(2), 266-275[2]
- ^ Rea, J. (2003). Covert Sensitization. The Behavior Analyst Today, 4 (2), 192-201[3]
- ^ Council on Scientific Affairs of the American Medical Association (1987). "Aversion therapy," Journal of the American Medical Association, 258(18), 2562-2565.
- ^ Cohen, L.J. & Galynker, I. I. (2002). Clinical features of pedophilia and implications for treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 8, 276-289.
- ^ EUX.TV - Berlin hospital says therapy helped 20 paedophiles
- ^ German Pedophilia Project Touts Results, Pleads for Funds | Germany | Deutsche Welle |31.05.2007
- ^ Leo, John (11/14/04). "What Kinsey wrought". US News & World Report.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Laws, D. Richard (2008). Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment. Guilford Press. pp. p3. ISBN 1593856059.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Spiegel, Josef (2003). Sexual Abuse of Males: The Sam Model of Theory and Practice. Routledge. pp. p5, p9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|contributors=
ignored (help) - ^ Global Crime Report | INVESTIGATION | Child porn and the cybercrime treaty part 2 |BBC World Service
- ^ Families flee paedophile protests August 92000, retrieved Jan 242008
- ^ Dutch paedophiles set up political party, May 302006, retrieved Jan2008
- ^ Absolute Zero United: Mission Statement, retrieved Jan2008
References
- Abel GG: Behavioral treatment of child molesters, in Perspectives on Behavioral Medicine. Edited by Stunkard AJ, Baum A. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989, pp 223-242
- Abel GG, Blanchard EB: The role of fantasy in the treatment of sexual deviation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 30:467-475, 1974
- Abel GG, Osborn CA: Clinical syndromes of adult psychiatry: the paraphilias, in The Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry. New York, Oxford University Press, in press.
- Abel GG, Rouleau J-L: Male sex offenders, in Handbook of Outpatient Treatment of Adults. Edited by Thase ME, Edelstein BA, Hersen M. New York, Plenum, 1990, pp 271-290
- Levine, Judith. (2002). Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children From Sex. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Discusses the perception and reality of pedophilia. ISBN 0-8166-4006-8.
- Pryor, Douglass, Unspeakable Acts: Why Men Sexually Abuse Children, New York Univ. Press, 1996.
- Rind et al. (1998). "A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples." Psychological Bulletin. 124 (1), 22-53.
- Scruton, Roger, Sexual Desire: A Moral Philosophy of the Erotic, Free, 1986.
- Wilson, Paul R. (1981). The Man They Called a Monster. Melbourne: Cassell Australia. ISBN 0-7269-9282-8. (Book about a court reporter who had sexual relationships with 2500 adolescent males; includes interviews with the later adults who reflect on these relationships.)
External links
- WebMd: Explaining Pedophillia - from a medical point of view
- Diagnostic criteria for Pedophilia in DSM-IV