User talk:Boothy443/Archive 5: Difference between revisions
Acetic Acid (talk | contribs) →Rfa Voting: Good night |
Acetic Acid (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
::Thank you for responding. Those sound reasonable. I wish others knew you weren't acting in bad faith. [[User:Acetic Acid|Acetic Acid]] 08:47, August 25, 2005 (UTC) |
::Thank you for responding. Those sound reasonable. I wish others knew you weren't acting in bad faith. [[User:Acetic Acid|Acetic Acid]] 08:47, August 25, 2005 (UTC) |
||
:::Hmmm... all right. Seems like a fair argument. I'm not sure if "Jimmy" is starting a cult, but whatever. By the way, it was hilarious that he clicked the gay porno link while at a conference. XD Good night Jason. [[User:Acetic Acid|Acetic Acid]] 08:57, August 25, 2005 (UTC) |
:::Hmmm... all right. Seems like a fair argument. I'm not sure if "Jimmy" is starting a cult, but whatever. By the way, it was hilarious that he clicked the gay porno link while at a conference. XD Good night Jason. [[User:Acetic Acid|Acetic Acid]] 08:57, August 25, 2005 (UTC) |
||
::::I thought he said someone else sent him an e-mail. They were monitoring your behavior or something. Then, he came across it by accident. [[User:Acetic Acid|Acetic Acid]] 09:01, August 25, 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:01, 25 August 2005
Today is Friday, December 27, 2024; it is now 17:29 (UTC/GMT) |
---|
3RR
Boothy, just a friendly reminder that you need to be careful about violating WP:3RR. While doing RC patrol, I stumbled upon Fox Chase, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and noticed that you had reverted four times in less than 24 hours. In the future, please don't do this, unless it is a clear-cut case of simple vandalism. Thanks for all your hard work, and happy editing! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 21:29, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- This would go for all the Philadelphia sections. Please discuss those changes on the talk page and do not violate 3RR. If you continue to do so, I will have no choice but to temporarily block you. Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 21:36, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Um no, considering that the move was never discussed in the first place, i see no point in discussing an improper move. So i'll just move it back to where it was in the first place. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 21:40, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Boothy, please don't do that one more time. While I see your side, it really doesn't matter whether the redirect is "right" or "wrong"- WP:3RR clearly states that no revert is allowed after 3 reverts in a 24 hour time period, unless it is simple vandalism or self-reverts. I urge you to stop reverting and leave the editors who are reverting you a note in order to resolve your differences. If you continue to violate 3RR, I will block you. Thanks for your understanding. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 21:57, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- NO, and you ovibously do not see my side, becaus if you did you you realise that the "enforcment" of this one sided policy is incorrect, but not as if i would expect anything different. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 22:03, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- I'm glad to see that you have stopped reverting the pages. One sided policy? Can you clarify that? Why do you feel that WP:3RR is one-sided? Thanks! Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Ryan Delaney talk 22:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Boothy, bud, just make it easy on yourself and leave it for a while. I don't know anything about the subject, but why don't you all start discussing the naming controversy on the relevant talk page, rather than getting into another edit war? The JPS 22:39, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
templates
Hi - I've done a fair amount with templates. What are you trying to do? -- Rick Block (talk) 03:45, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- So, just to make sure I understand, you want the box where the flag and seal are to have only the seal (as in the current invocation), only the flag, both, or none - all depending on the presence of the "flag" and "seal" parameters? -- Rick Block (talk) 04:07, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- I'll think about it. Do you know user:Rorro? S/he seems to be the creator of Template:If defined call1. Seems like you might need a variant. I haven't figured out exactly how Template:If defined call1 works yet. I'll think about and let you know if I figure out an answer. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:17, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
re:my RFA
I was wondering what was keeping you, I assumed you'd vote oppose as soon as my RFA was posted up, anyway, I just wanted to leave you a note to remind you to update your votecount when you vote. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 07:06, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
Trenton
Do you understand what ambiguity is? Having an article called "Trenton Rail Station" is a perfect example. Trenton is a disambiguation page because there are many places called Trenton. --SPUI (talk) 07:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
It's hella better than what you keep moving it to. --SPUI (talk) 07:46, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
I guess that works, though that station wasn't always the main one in Trenton. That could be disambigged though. --SPUI (talk) 07:48, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Until around 1865, the Northeast Corridor between Trenton and Monmouth Junction was not built - instead the main line went along the Delaware and Raritan Canal. [1] shows the old station. There was also the Reading station at the end of the branch from West Trenton at Five Points, shown on [2] - that existed until that branch was abandoned. --SPUI (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Rfa Voting
I know you have a tendency to oppose everyone, and I respect your right to vote the way you want. But, a lot of people are opposing Celestianpower's nomination. You could go with the flow and oppose, or you could make a statement and support her. Acetic Acid 08:13, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Scratch that. May I ask what your voting policy is? I see you support some people, while opposing others. Acetic Acid 08:16, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for responding. Those sound reasonable. I wish others knew you weren't acting in bad faith. Acetic Acid 08:47, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Hmmm... all right. Seems like a fair argument. I'm not sure if "Jimmy" is starting a cult, but whatever. By the way, it was hilarious that he clicked the gay porno link while at a conference. XD Good night Jason. Acetic Acid 08:57, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- I thought he said someone else sent him an e-mail. They were monitoring your behavior or something. Then, he came across it by accident. Acetic Acid 09:01, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Hmmm... all right. Seems like a fair argument. I'm not sure if "Jimmy" is starting a cult, but whatever. By the way, it was hilarious that he clicked the gay porno link while at a conference. XD Good night Jason. Acetic Acid 08:57, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for responding. Those sound reasonable. I wish others knew you weren't acting in bad faith. Acetic Acid 08:47, August 25, 2005 (UTC)