User talk:Pascal.Tesson

undeleting VID (TV Company)

If you think a better article can be made of it, I have no objection VID (TV Company) being restored. —tregoweth (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Annette."Annette 15".Obrestad.jpg

the tag is placed there as part of the upload there is no meaningful assetion of own work.Genisock2 19:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Help needed fast

Can you e-mail me with your e-mail address. You can probably guess who it's to do with. I've recieved a not so nice e-mail...... Davnel03 20:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Got your address, and have sent you e-mail back. Davnel03 20:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

etoro forex platform 2nd deletion

it seems you hardly give any thought to helping me understand what exactly needs to be improved in order for it to be ok with you, and just delete it before I get a chance to say anything. I was going to add more info in order to make it "more relevant" as you requested, but since I have no clue what qualifies as information and what qualifies as advertising according to your mysterious standarts, I left it at that point. When I came back to fix it, you already deleted it, that's no way to explain yourself. Wikipedia has thousends of articles about softwares, take for example this article which has a screenshot and a link to the company's homepage. I haven't posted any links or screenshots and haven't advertised anything, so any "it's an ad" arguments you might have - fail. now you say it's not notable, but instead of helping you just delete it. I am in the process of improving the article and turning it into something "more relevant" ( whatever that means, 'cos you don't explain anything ). maybe trying to explain how to write an article instead of deleting it without giving a proper explanation would be more fitting to your position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JeromeDaurdan (talk • contribs) 09:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

ViewOn.Tv deletion ?

Hi Pascal,

I'm confused. ViewOn.Tv is a system used in several countries with more than 4000 users (Not yet downloadable for some countries, but we are working on this). Like Joost, Babelgum companies I think this service has a place in Wikipedia, no ?

There is no difference, except we do not advertise in countries we do not support !

Maybe there is something we have to change in the page to have something more appropriate for encyclopedia ?

Please tell me

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viewon01 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Fake IP Block

Hello a user by the name of Davl103 has put a fake IP Block on my IP Page. HE HAS no admistrator privliges.Here is the evidence.63.3.10.1 18:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Um. Would it be considered a fake block? On a side note, I've had three e-mails about password change from Wikimedia, with someone from the above IP address wanting to change my password. Also, its not 63.3.10.1 IP page. It's 63.3.10.130 IP page. See this edit. Also. Thanks, Davnel03 14:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

William Everleigh

Hello there.

I see that you removed the speedy notice from the page, which of course was fair and proper as there is assertation of notability. I'm looking into whether or not this is a hoax, and my limited internet resources have left me dry so far. Considering you may have access to Lexus-Nexus or something of the sort, perhaps you might be able to find something? Otherwise I'm going to AfD the article in a couple days. I haven't given up hope, but there's little to be had left. Keegan^talk 04:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Good deal. This makes for a good example of why hoaxes are not speedy candidates but nonsense is, and the separation of the two. Keep up the good work, Pascal. Keegan^talk 03:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Need some help with a move

I was trying to clean up one of User:Beko120's junk page moves, but made a hash of it. I tried to rename the old (and better) page (which was then a redirect) to a temp name to enable moving the page back to the old name. I stupidly hadn't remembered that it would just create a double redirect situation. The page in question is currently named BBC CBBC Channel and I was trying to get it back to just CBBC Channel. There's now a page I created called CBBC Channel (temp) that should be deleted.

Sorry for fouling this up and for having to bother you. I figured you were the right guy since you put a block on this pinhead's accounts, so you have at least a passing familiarity with his games.

Thanks. Majorclanger 00:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Have placed a request at WP:RM to sort this out. _TheIslander 00:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Computer Builders Warehouse?

Hi Pascal,

Can you please explain why you would delete Computer Builders Warehouse, this company is the largest computer company in the state of michigan, you can check Intel, AMD, Microsoft website and find this company. The largest supplier of AMD in the Great Lakes Area. This company complies with the list of michigan based companies? This would be like deleteing Dell or Newegg.com or Tigerdirect from this website? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrbreslin (talk • contribs) 04:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Self images

Hi Pascal,

I had nominated non-notable self photos for deletion but I guess you have reverted the tags. Can you please guide me if it is OK to upload self photos and advertise oneself? Thanks -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 11:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Pascal. Self-images are so few to come by, anyways.. -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 11:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for deletions

Thanks for deleting the Wagner categories I created that should have been Richard Wagner ones.--Peter cohen 15:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Bradyosksa (talk · contribs) and Trevorrocks10 (talk · contribs)

Creators of Bradyosksa and Trevorrocks10. Want to deal with these boys? - CobaltBlueTony 16:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

template under ANI - deletion

hi, you've recently delteted this template [1] which is mentioned as a prime example for a policy violation under these ANIs - [2], [3] and this AN [4].

i have no idea regarding the protocols on such deletions when a case about them is still in progress, and i would request that you - a person with the admin tools that allow looking into deletion history - consider giving the ANI case a serious look (there's a lot of material there) and consider giving a 3rd opinion. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 20:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

replied to you here. Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 21:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thank You Note from Jehochman

		Ready to swab the deck!
		Another motley scallawag has joined the crew. Thanks for your comments at my RFA. Arrrgh! - - Jehochman Talk 02:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou for deleting my template

Hi - you (correctly) deleted a template I'd corrected and then blanked showing the claims on number of deaths in Jenin 2002. Can you comment on how I should have presented this information (which was a duplicate of something I created in Talk)? I want to make it permanently available from the article, but not give it WP:UNDUE. PR^talk 09:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for deletion of my page

I appreciate your help, but I need it again, I would like to get a user page deleted, (under the right to vanish) I tried but the guy who's stalking me sees this and quickly deletes my request! Can you help me with this. This guy has made my life miserable with false accusations, constant emails for the last month or so with cyber-stalking. Please advise, I am terrified. good-bye (from a fellow Canadian, by the way my boyfriend went to McGill, its a beutiful school haha)198.96.80.15 19:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Well it would help if you told me what that userpage is. How am I supposed to guess? And who's stalking you? Pascal.Tesson 19:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The message is from banned user Tweety21. Read up on her history here (with diffs galore). Precious Roy 15:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Zinta

I put it up for speedy delete ealrier but nobody deleted it ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 23:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

We now have many images in the article and this image was unsuitable. Seems as I uploaded I think I have every right to put it up for speedy ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 23:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

StealBoy strikes again?

You asked me to let me know of any vandalism by StealBoy or his sockpuppets.

I'm not sure if this is the same, but there have been some odd additions to Cosgrove Hall Films just recently.

Regards,

Lynbarn 14:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Blocked the two IPs involved. Pascal.Tesson 14:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Please delete these as well ...

Hello, Pascal.Tesson ... you recently deleted the sandbox User:72.75.70.147/Deletion warnings after I tagged it with {{db-userreq}} ... would you please check my recent contributions and delete those other tagged sandboxes from previous IP accounts as well? The current versions are archived as sandboxes under a registered account ... Thnx! —68.239.76.49 (talk · contribs) 14:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Beau coup thanks for the quick response ... would you also please zap the two that I've found and tagged since then? —68.239.76.49 19:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey Pal!

Hello Pascal.Tesson, I just wanted to say thanks for doing such a great job on editing stuff on Wikipedia. I especially enjoyed the revisions ON EVERY article you did. Great job, keep up the great work!

Cheers, Goldenstatewarroirs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenstatewarroirs (talk • contribs) 22:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Adminship

Eherm Hello. I want to tell you somthing. Well you are an administrator so you can do things that I can't do. I'm likeing a nomination for adminship but I can't go on that page becuse I've got this Net Nanny internet security and I don't know the password. Okay this is going to be real simple! All you have got to do is go to the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship page and go to nominate and got to Nominate someone else and leave me to fill in the qustions and notify me on my talk page and have my requst for adminship link and when I've filled It in I'll notify you again and you put it on the Requsts for adminship page. Cheers! Robbie williams star 24576 17:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Montreal photos

I've just uploaded some photos of Montreal (despite being probably Canada's most photogenic city, it seems very poorly served image-wise). However, I don't know the city particularly well; can you have a look at the images here and make sure I've captioned them correctly, before I make a fool of myself? — iridescent (talk to me!) 22:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Fogo de Chão

Hi Pascal,

Last month you deleted this article that I created under CSD:G11. I believe that the deletion was not in order as the article was not spam or advertising (although some editors subsequent to myself had added in rather a lot about the menu) and should have been trimmed not deleted. Will you consider restoring the article? If you do and let me know I will trim out the spam and improve it. If not, I will list it at WP:DRV. Stifle (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Why??

Why did you ban User:Ps3ps3? That user did not commit any crime!! He is innocent and I command you to lift that ban or else! If you are wondering, I am not his friend, but protecting those who did nothing wrong. You are abusing your authority to ban other users. You are unjust and not fair! Think about it: Are you doing the right thing by banning those who are innocent?

Cheers, Goldenstatewarroirs 01:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Spot zoning

Hello, I removed redirect because the targeted article does not cover spot zoning. Spot zoning is sufficiently complex and distinguishable from zoning proper to warrant its own article. If it should be included into zoning later on after spot zoning article has been completed, then a merge would be appropriate.

After I removed the redirect I saw that you're an admin. Can you remove the vandalism banner? The editor who initially put it up did so in error, which he mentions on the article's talk page. Thank you.EECavazos 14:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

POV pushing by MoritzB

Hello. I think that User:MoritzB has gone too far. On Race and intelligence he inserted an extremely offensive quote from a Sunday Times interview with James D. Watson. I am sure that MoritzB is quite aware that the quote generated a furore in Britain with statements by government ministers and a cancelled event at the science museum in London. Watson was forced to retract the statement and make a public apology; yet the quote remained in the article. MoritzB quietly sat by without making further comment. I am appalled that an editor thinks that obvious unscientific tittle-tattle like this, from somebody who is well-known to be intentionally outspoken and provocative, is suitable for this encyclopedia. MoritzB has not responded on either the article discussion page or on his own talk page. It would seem from this that MoritzB has a definite racist agenda, which smacks of the far right. Can anything be done? --Mathsci 06:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

In reply to your comment on my talk page: I am far too busy in real life to do what you suggested. You did not do so yourself last time you made a report about MoritzB on WP:AN/I. Do special laws apply to you? --00:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathsci (talk • contribs)

I'm sorry if this seemed rude or abrupt. The main point was to keep you informed, since you had expressed your own misgivings on a previous occasion. Your reluctance to intervene is completely understandable. Cheers, Mathsci 16:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Deleted articles

What do these articles say? You deleted them. I am curious. Archtransit 19:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh! If it's copyrighted, I'll remove it above and from my user talk page (even though it's just an excerpt. Archtransit 15:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Razor & Tie

Hi, I noticed this article got nuked last week. Razor & Tie is a highly notable record company; could you please userfy me a copy of the deleted article so I can rewrite it? Thanks. Chubbles 15:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree - while R&T isn't particularly well known, it's a very significant label in the mid-90s indie scene as it was the US label for a number of significant UK & Canadian bands, and the article doesn't seem particularly spammy - I'll userify it to User:Chubbles/Razor & Tie — iridescent 15:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I deleted it because it had just been recreated by a spammer. I have no objections to re-creation provided it is correctly referenced. Pascal.Tesson 15:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: Deletion of page titled "Patrick Norman"

You deleted a page titled "Patrick Norman", stating copyright infringement. I am to author of the article, biography, his website, and I am his wife. We (Patrick Norman & myself) own all of the rights (all right reserved et al.)for any and all things relating to his projects "Patrick Norman" and "Patrick Norman Music". As an owner and founding member of the band "Rusted Root", Patrick Norman also owns all copyrights (all right reserved, et al.) pertaining to his band Rusted Root. This article was created to give readers an accurate biography of Patrick Norman, not only as a solo artist, but also a current member of Rusted Root. What is needed to have the page undeleted, and linked properly to the page titled "Rusted Root". Please advise, thank you. IMuseProductions 03:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)IMuseProductions

Image:Rebekka Guðleifsdóttir.jpg

I believe you misinterpreted the license for the image at Flikr, please look again, and restore the image. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 14:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The flickr license for this photo has changed from {{cc-by-nc-2.0}} to {{cc-by-2.0}}, so it is now acceptable. You should note, however, that this image was previously uploaded twice in contravention of Wikipedia image use policies. Richard, please be more careful in the future. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 14:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

It's now at the Commons, so undeletion is unnecessary. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 14:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Rudget RfA

Dearest Opposer,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed unsuccessfully with 39 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. I would have liked to gain some experience of being an admin, but it wasn't to be. At least I gained some valuable time there and will use my knowledge picked up to my next candidacy. I would like to say once again, thank you for voting and I hope to see you at my next request be it a nomination or self-induced, I hope I don't get as many questions! Rudget _{Contributions} 09:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Twinkle

Pascal, I always check the images I delete using the Bad Old Ones Tool. I never do it blindly; the time when I do that is when hell freezes over. Twinkle is just a tool that does deletions all a time, after I've inspected the category I want to delete. --Maxim_{(talk) (contributions)} 20:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

RE: Deletion of Fit-PC

You cited "Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." But you excised the following sentence, "Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." And that's all it was. The page was deleted months before, at which point it was advertising (not my creation at that time). The page I put up was simply information. It contained not a single value judgment regarding the quality of the product. Please undelete. Lucy1981 07:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Editprotected tweak

Hello. Thanks for fulfilling my Editprotected request on {{Infobox Officeholder}}. However, I need to bother you again because there was apparently a little copy-paste error during the update (diff): the second SPAN (applied on {{{honorific-suffix}}}) should have stayed as "honorific-suffix" instead of becoming a second "honorific-prefix". Could you tweak it? Thanks in advance, — Komusou ^talk @ 13:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Successful RfA - Thank you!

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! — KieferSkunk (talk) — 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

The Great Boz and Bozinism

very confused as to why this page was deleted along with the Bozinism page. many hours of work right down the drain, and explanation would be nice at the very least. 8:40pm oct 28 2007

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Boz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bozinism

Deletion of User:Shmedes userpage

Please restore User:Shmede userpage. You have removed copyrighted information without the user's permission. If the information is not restored then I will not hesitate to take legal action. Regards, 86.162.12.192 15:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Right... Quoting from Wikipedia:Free speech,

In short, Editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right; there is no right to edit Wikipedia. As difficult as it is to accept, and as harsh as it sounds to say it, there are only two rights on Wikipedia: the right to fork and the right to leave.

Wikipedia is not MySpace, if you want free web-space for you and your friends, you're just knocking on the wrong door. Please also not that legal threats on Wikipedia are a definite no-no, though yours is probably too comical to be considered as much of a nuisance. Pascal.Tesson 16:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I have several friends of mine who would pull your case apart if you were not to give us our information back. Regards, 86.162.12.192 17:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Then I suggest you turn to them. I'm sure they'll get a kick out of your whining. I don't. Pascal.Tesson 18:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I have done, and they are doing thanks. You won't get a kick out of anything sat taking the fun out of everyone's lives on Wikipedia. 86.162.12.192 18:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

NO LONGER MATTERS LOSERS, WE HAVE IT BACK FROM OUR GREAT TRUSTED FRIENDS AND IT WILL BE BACK ALL OVER WIKIPEDIA!86.162.12.192 18:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Undelete "Missing Men of Saturn 1st Edition Dust Jacket.jpg"

I've moved the Missing Men of Saturn stub into the main namespace. I'd like to include the image now as well. Thanks!  :) FusionKnight 02:19, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

The Features

Please restore the article for my (BBC) favorite (PopMatters) band. If it's just a matter of not having enough source material, let me know and I'll edit it, but it would be nice to have a place to start from. I can also say that their music has been used as the background for at least one commercial (CBS), they got dropped from their label for refusing to cover All You Need Is Love for a Chase credit card commercial (an option eventually given to Nada Surf, a band that IS on Wikipedia) and they do the theme to the ABC TV show Carpoolers. This more than meets the standards for a band, because they've toured extensively in England and nationwide in the US. They've also had major US radio airplay with their song "Blow It Out". Here's their page on MTV--Vcalzone 15:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I hope that you don't get offended, but I started a request for a deletion review.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of The_Features. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Vcalzone 15:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

New Entry for Mike Cooley

I notice that you deleted an entry for the labour activist Mike Cooley a couple of months ago.

I'm in the process of writing a new page, which I will base upon my interpretation of the German WP entry for him [5]. I don't know anything about the original copyright violation you spotted, but I assume that my approach will be okay with you. Any comments would be much appreciated. jxm 02:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Draft at MRG

Thanks, that is a great solution. --Kevin Murray 15:19, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

CSD of Image:Jonouchi Linework.jpg

Hi. I was wondering if you could reconsider the CSD for Image:Jonouchi Linework.jpg. Three other images from this same contributer were CSDed as being invalid fair-use and copyright violations: Image:Anzu Linework.jpg, Image:Kaiba Linework.jpg, Image:Yugi Linework.jpg. With this one, someone new to doing CSDed changed the license on this one not realizing the others had already been removed or the copyright infringement. He apologized and suggested I CSD again under the copyright violation, which I did. This image, like the, others violates copyrights and seems to be stolen goods (online distribution of non-public domain art work that is still actively sold and traded). I hope you will reconsider this CSD. Thanks. Collectonian 17:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Great Chicken Wing Hunt

You deleted and slammed as advertising an entry I put up on the Great Chicken Wing Hunt, a hunt for the world's best Buffalo Chicken Wing in NY State. I suppose I understand why since at the time the hunt was not completed. However, that hunt has now been completed and received, from what I saw, rather wide local and national coverage. Thus, I would like to put up a new entry about a documentable event that I do think does belong on an internet encyclopaedia. Please advise as to what sort of content changes are needed for the entry to qualify. Thanks. [[User:Salembier|Salembier}] 12:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Restoration of Image:MS Paint in Windows 1 and 2.PNG

Hi. I think this image, which you deleted, is necessary to justify the sourcing for Image:MS Paint in Windows 1.PNG. Would you please restore it and help me to keep it from being deleted again? Thanks!   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mao1970.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mao1970.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Copy right authrization

Hello Pascal, You deleted the article "The myth of December 25th" due to copyrights. The author himself wrote an e-mail to me and authorized the publising of it:

AUTORIZAÇÃO

Autorizamos a "Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre" a utilizar em suadatabase e sob licença "GFDL - GNU Free Documentation License" os

textos e informações constantes em http://somostodosum.ig.com.br/conteudo/conteudo.asp?id=6705 e http://somostodosum.ig.com.br/conteudo/conteudo.asp?id=6728

Atenciosamente,

AcidZero

Realizador do site Saindo da Matrix (www.saindodamatrix.com.br)

truxton@gmail.com

Do you need translation sicne it´s in portuguese? Lulu Margarida ^yes? 16:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Even if the copyright question is cleared, this is not an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Any salvageable content should appear in an article about the history of Christmas celebrations. The article as it appeared before its deletion is not suitable for Wikipedia. Pascal.Tesson 19:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Socker

Not sure if you noticed when you removed recent trolling [6] on your discussion page that the user Ps45 [7] , is almost definitely a sock puppet account of the user Ps3ps3, which you recently banned. [8] This puppet account, as well as another sock puppet account you banned, Goldenstatewarroirs [sic], [9] both have modified my user/talk pages in the past, the most recent not necessarily being vandalism, just more trolling, obviously the user retrieved my user name after I reverted vandalism to Philistines made under the Goldenstatewarriors account Brando130 17:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

FYI

Please look at this which recently came up on the ANI board. I am also still getting the "reset password" e-mails from WikiMedia, stating that IP address 63.3.10.130 wants it changed. It is now, as you can see from the link, happening with other users. Any way you can stop the IP's in that range (it's also 63.3.10.1 and 63.3.10.2) sending e-mails to wiki@wikimedia.org? This can (and is) get annoying. Thanks, Davnel03 21:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I posted the WP:ANI thread. Perhaps a checkuser is needed to confirm that all of the socks originate from the same IP address, followed by a notice to the ISP's admins/abuse desk. Caknuck 21:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

63.3.10.130 resolves to UUNET, the abuse e-mail address is abuse-mail@verizonbusiness.com. Caknuck 21:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Image deletion

When you delete an image because it is on commons, would you mind carefully checking to make sure that they have the same name? If they don't, then your deletion removes the image from the article. The image in question is Image:Bell207.jpg, which you deleted, and Image:Bell 207.jpg which is on commons (in this case, the difference is a space between the mfr and model number). If there is a difference, please take the time to fix the article rather than leave it with a redlink where there once was an image. AKRadecki^Speaketh 05:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Amy Miranda deletion ?

Hello Pascal,

I'm a bit confused at your deletion of the article on Amy Miranda. She is a well known and awarded producer of online work in the advertising industry. Like other producers I think the article belongs on Wikipedia as it is a good reference of both her work and her background for those interested.

Maybe there is something I can change in the page to have something more appropriate for encyclopedia ? Could you please undelete so that the article may be edited to address your comments?

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Transcendz (talk • contribs) 06:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

The article has a clearly inappropriate tone. Wikipedia is not a soapbox and this was clearly written as a promo-piece. Like I said in the deletion summary, I have no objection to a re-created article that is truly attributed to reliable third-party sources and which is not a thinly-veiled attempt at glorification of the subject. Pascal.Tesson 19:17, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

re: Adminship

Thanks for the offer but I think I'll put it off - I don't have nearly as much time nowadays as I did to spend on the project, and my edits reflect that. Crystallina 00:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dearest Pascal Tesson,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your kind words of support and willingness to come to my defense on the ageism accusation are very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to The_undertow and Phoenix-wiki for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.

Lara❤Love 19:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Credits: This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor's RFA thanks which was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

Undelete "Image:Rocket to Luna 1st Edition Dust Jacket.jpg"

Please undelete "Image:Rocket to Luna 1st Edition Dust Jacket.jpg". The article is now created and moved into the main namespace. The image would no longer be orphaned. Thanks! FusionKnight 04:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

My (Remember the dot)'s RfA

I never thanked you for participating in my RfA a couple of weeks ago. Thank you for your support, though unfortunately the request was closed as "no consensus". I plan to run again at a later time, and I hope you will support me again then.

Thanks again! —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Undelete "Image:Stadium Beyond the Stars 1st Edition Dust Jacket.jpg"

Please undelete this image. The article Mel Hunter (the artist who created the illustration) now references this image. When the image is undeleted, I will add another fair use rationale for this article. Thanks in advance! FusionKnight 03:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Old Troll, New Tricks

Would you mind taking a look at some of the recent edits [10] from our old buddy Beko. On a couple of recent occasions, he has either undone vandalism within a minute or two in the pages he usually haunts or requested a page protection immediately following an event of vandalism. Not surprisingly, the anon vandals fall in the same IP range (usually 86.something or 81.something) and share Beko's spelling oddities. The most obvious case is the edits to TUGs on November 13 - the page is vandalized at 20:11, and Beko makes his first edit of the day to undo it one minute later, which he follows up with a request for the page to be protected. A similar thing happened on the 16th - Fireman Sam is vandalized at 20:54, a bot immediately reverts it, and Beko asks for protection a few minutes later. I don't know if you have checkuser permission, but I'd bet my house his IP matches the anon vandal.

The section title is a bit deceiving, because I think he's done similar stunts with some of his shill/puppet accounts in the past [11] [12] [13].

Sorry to bother you with this twit (again), but the behavior is so bizarre that I'm not sure where to report it, and my patience with the reporting process is limited at best. Since you're already aware of this joker, I figured you would be more able to quickly recognize the pattern here than a random admin.

Thanks. Majorclanger (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Response Insurance

I understand what you are saying about the images...I mistakenly put the incorrect licensing info on the image.

In regards to the article being an advertisement, I would have to disagree! The only inforamtion given is the name of the holding company, the logo they use, and a survey that they do about driving habits. There is no mention of Response Insurance being better than any other insurance co. and there is also no mention of the rates, service, or why people should switch. This is the first time I have ever posted anything on Wikipedia, but I have made this article as neutral as possible, and I cannot for the life of me figure out what to change to make it more neutral and less of an apparent advertisement. Please advise...--Shawkey3 (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

By the way I do not work for Response Insurance...I am just assisting someone who asked me to do this.--Shawkey3 (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Live in Cleaveland

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Live in Cleaveland, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Live in Cleaveland is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Live in Cleaveland, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Response Insurance

I disagree with the fact that the section about their national survey is as you call it a "glowing paragraph"...For example the entire Geico page is basically a list of all the commercials they have done, which I think constitutes advertisement. In regards to Response, they conduct a yearly survey on driving habits that is used in various mediums. This is not promoting Response Insurance, it is outlining what the company has done in the past and present. The information used on the Response page is all public knowledge that has no copyright issues...there description of the logo, how they were formed, and the surveys they conduct. This page has been rewritten and all the articles in the survey section have been referenced, and I urge you to reconsider the deletion. In regards to the images that were deleted, I will correct the copyright issue.--Shawkey3 (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Epitaph Records orphans deletions

Bah: if it's not edit or protection conflicts, it's deletion conflicts instead! :) Thanks for the efficiency in deleting those portal orphans. :) Acalamari 18:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Gotta love those Firefox tabs. :-) Pascal.Tesson (talk) 19:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Crash two-disc DVD

You deleted a photo that was not unused within seven days and you should put in back just in case someone does use it and puts it on a article within seven days. Thank You.--Stco23 (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove CSD tag

Why did you remove the CSD tag for "Fingerskate"? It provides very little information. Thank you.-- Vintei  talk  22:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, maybe you're right. Thank you.-- Vintei  talk  14:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips

Hi, it's Putnam269. I wanted to thank you for the tips about the song articles. Although I am currently not planning on creating any more articles for a while, in the future, I will make it a point to use your tips. By reading some of the other song-related articles by other users, I can see how I can expand on my articles and will do so in the future. Thanks a lot, --Putnam269 (talk) 05:25, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

A big sarcastic thanks!

Your page does NOT indicate the importance or significance of what its supposed to do! However, I believe my article on Judith Gibbins was very imformative! I am sure many people would like to know who the heck the voice was of Lara Croft in 97-98 and what happened to her! If you go around deleting pages then I'm sure you can go around re-writing them to make them "indicate" their "significance"

Not a joke

The article William Buckels was not a Joke Article.

[14]

--Bill Buckels (talk) 22:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Friend Needed

HELLO PASCAL.TESSON!!

I HAVE JUST CREATED A WIKIPEDIA ACCOUNT AND I NEED A FRIEND TO GUIDE ME THROUGH THE TOUGH WATERS OF WIKIPEDIA. I HAVE LOOKED YOU UP AND I AM SO IMPRESSED AT YOUR STATUS AS AN ADMINISTRATOR. I NEED A FRIEND!

WILL YOU BE MY FRIEND???

PLEASE!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ps89 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Cowboycaleb possibly back

Firstly, I changed my username from Davnel03 to D.M.N. a few weeks ago. Now, I see that someone has just started editing under that username, see here. Their grammer is not very good, see here. I'm almost certain the Caleb is editing and has created an immitation account of me under Davnel03. Just letting you know the user has been blocked indef. Cheers, Davnel03 22:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I have taken the above evidence to WP:ANI. Davnel03 09:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Myscarygirl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Myscarygirl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Stephen Kaplan

All the copyrighted material used was with permission of the authors. I personally kniow Troy Taylor of prairieghosts.com. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vwjr (talk • contribs) 20:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:31107 at Derby.jpg

Regarding this edit which I presume is you. I've discussed User:ACBest/Credit with the user in question explaining that it is possible to specify the means of attribution required without this which duplicates much of {{Attribution}}. Having highlighted how I've formatted this very image the user has not objected to this approach. Adambro (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

DJ F-Bod

FYI: You just deleted this article and user recreated it. -- ALLSTARecho 08:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, User:Jmlk17 just deleted it again. -- ALLSTARecho 08:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Bloody Hell

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Bloody Hell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Ciaobelli.com: Page deletion

Good evening,

I am just wondering why you deleted the Ciaobelli page I created. You've defined it "blatant advertising" so I am asking you what's the difference between the content of that page and those of other social networks on Wikipedia?

Looking forward for an immediate reply,

Andrea D'Ottavio Founding Partner, Ciaobelli.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea07016 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

GAC

I was wondering if you could look over History of Davenport, Iowa and see if it is ready to be a GAC yet, if not, what I need to do to improve it Ctjf83^talk 19:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back

I noticed that you had been offline for sometime, and that you've now started editing again. Welcome back, Pascal.Tesson! :) Acalamari 22:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Roman Catholic dioceses of Great Britain

This category was emptied and trashed. I am restoring it back to where it was. Up until 4 days ago it had stayed just the same and was very useful. Benkenobi18 (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

FlowerPetal.Com

This article was underconstruction as the guidelines indicated. Seems like someone would have offered up a more constructive talk, then to speedily delete. I followed the same format as other company articles have done. Please advise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marky36 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Just for fun

P.T, I have been impressed with your comments in recent WikiDiscussions and had the thought to ask if I might enlist your assistance - both as an editor and as an admin perspective - in a few (future?) WikiEssays that I have begun or conceived. I value others' views and think that you would be a great help to them. A couple literally need complete writing and a couple have been started. Anyway, feel free to take a look and if you're interested and able to contribute, please do! I would appreciate the help! It's just for fun, if you have the time and the inkling. The essays are:

• Create Your Own Cabal —
• Don't Assume Good Faith —
• Don't Engage In Crusades —
• Edit Counts Don't Matter —
• Guilty Until Proven Innocent —
• WikiPhilia —

Thanks in advance for any help you may provide! • VigilancePrime • • • 20 18:55 Feb '08

Thank you for the invitation, but to be honest, I'm not quite sure why you'd bother writing all of this. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Copypaste is your friend here on Wikipedia... ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

All I will say is thank you :-). ShoesssS ^Talk 03:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

PS: - By the way – no warning :-). ShoesssS ^Talk 03:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Although, for the record, you definitely deserved one. But I'm not a big believer in warnings, especially since you seemed fully aware that your last reply was overboard. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Martijn RfA

Hi. In your support for the RfA nomination of User:Martijn Hoekstra you refer to 'diffs presented below by Harland1'. Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't see any diffs presented by Harland1. Could you point me to the relevant pages? Thanks!--RegentsPark (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. Perhaps I should take a second look since we seem to have come to diametrically opposite conclusions.--RegentsPark (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the perspective. I see now that if no well-meaning editor tried to find a reasonable ground in articles such as the pro-pedophilia one, the pedia would be a mess of special interest positions. Thanks!--RegentsPark (talk) 11:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello Pascal, I hope I am doing this correctly. Thank you for the help on my first attempt at a page "Finney Ross". Is there anything else I need to do, or is the editing you did ok as is? Thank you very much! Vintagedirtbiker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vintagedirtbiker (talk • contribs) 18:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Email?

I feel bad about our exchange. You don't have email activated, but if you can ping my email there's something I'd like to mention. Raymond Arritt (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

A message from WarthogDemon.

Korean Fir I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, was unsuccessful with 61 support, 25 oppose, and 4 neutral. I've been taking the advice of the Opposes into practice and hopefully I can improve myself. Once again, thank you. ^_^

Hello, Pascal.Tesson. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding policy. The discussion can be found under the topic Wikistalkers by erstwhile administrators deserve severe sanctions - Judge them for what they did. --Cuddlyable3 (talk) 14:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Awarding Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Aprils fools day was a blast. Loads of users lightened up to have good old fashion fun. I want to thank you for taking part in editing this page in particular and even though I may not know you, embrace the same talk pages, or even edit with you in the near future, I'd like to award you this Barnstar for making Wikipedia a fun environment in which to contribute. Until next year. :) SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of "Garden & Weeks Hall"

You deleted the page Garden & Weeks Hall, however I'd like to know how the article can be edited. Other articles about Imperial College London halls of residence are present in Wikipedia, yet have not been deleted: Beit Hall, or Wilson House... (Oh and in case you're wondering, these halls are all non profit. They also do not "market" directly to students - the university is responsible for allocating places in halls of residence to first year students.)

DanielJar (talk) 15:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Heads up

I thought you would like to know that I am citing this event in my upcoming RFA. I address the issue here (question 3). I know it's old and (for me, anyway) painful history, but I'm sure it'll be discussed and I didn't think it would be right if somebody surprised you about it while the RFA was taking place. Hope all is going well in your life --Sharkface217 01:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks

Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence § t/e 18:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/WhichWay676676

Thanks for the heads-up here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 16:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Red Hot Reiner Peppers

Can this be rolled back? It was deleted under WP:Music A7, yet it's the only Live Midi band I'm aware of in existance, which is what makes it notable simply for being such. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pacifictiger (talk • contribs) 18:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

my RFA

Hey thanks for your support. Maybe it's because I haven't finished my coffee yet, but what are these PAW-related articles I am insane to work on? :) Thanks, VanTucky 17:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah. I think I took the userbox off my userspace and quit watching the page. Actually, the constant yammering and bullish behavior of some anti-pedophile crusaders got to be more odious than the one or so actual, real pedophile activists who pop up regularly. They see pedophiles hidden in every shadow, and it got to be intolerable. VanTucky 20:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Reiner peppers

Hi, can you explain why you left the AFD link as a redlink at Red Hot Reiner Peppers? This doesn't allow people to find the AFD, so I recommend you withdraw the AFD request, then start again with a proper tag with a bluelink and not a redlink. Best, Badagnani (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Mediawiki bug. A null edit solved the problem. While it was a redlink, the redlink did take you to the right debate page and since many have already participated, there's no reason to restart the AfD. It's pretty clear that I shouldn't have undeleted the article in the first place. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 13:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Gallery of country flags

Good call. Thanks. DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky

Lady Aleena's RfA

Pascal.Tesson...Thank you for supporting my nomination for adminship. Through it I have become aware of a great many people who can help me in my future editing endeavors. Even though I was not promoted, your support shows that I still have something to contribute to Wikipedia, even if it is minor edits to fix spelling and grammar to working in WikiProjects to help others make great articles. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use its talk page. Stop by my talk page anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! - LA @ 04:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

StealBoy?

Not sure if this is the aforementioned StealBoy but I just marked an article created by CoolMattew8888 (talk · contribs), Films (film) as a hoax - and prodded it - as it is about a film scheduled for release later this year from Columbia Pictures which seems not to be generating Google hits, which is a tad unlikely. I have reverted the links on a couple of articles to this one, which were added by an IP at the same time. (Note to self: I really must bone up on the various film hoaxers as I seem to run into them on New pages at least once a week ;O). Anyhoo, you can take a look at my edits from around 01:30 UTC ... Cheers FlowerpotmaN·(t) 01:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

• Just a PS while you are around :They do seem to pop up around the weekend. You might want to take a look at the history of Disney's Magical Mirror Starring Mickey Mouse and I think you might spot the common thread. I don't think it's StealBoy, and as I said I reeeaallly have to bone up on who's who in the hoax department, but is there someone who has a habit of adding (virtually) incomprehensible edits to Disney articles? FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

• • (reply) Yup, now that I think of it, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Which Way and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Music Tunes were probably StealBoy. Actually, I think the reason I ended up in Disney-related articles was that I was following a one similar article and tripped over a couple of other obvious hoaxes. And I also have to admit that I am more Loony Tunes oriented, myself ;O) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 04:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Alexei Gromoff?

Why have you deleted my page, there are many other pages similar to it that exist so why can't mine. --Qboy1 (talk) 06:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Birdmen

Hiya. Re the above article, the history says you protected it, expiring in June. However, if I go to the article, I don't get any warnings about it being protected - is this what's supposed to happen, or should that little padlock symbol appear on the page ? CultureDrone (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh yes, and apologies for not going wayyyy back to the earliest versions before I requested a speedy delete :-) CultureDrone (talk) 12:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

My UserPage

I will not be changing it. As the article you quoted to me states, "It does not, however, include statements that support controversial groups or regimes, that some may interpret as an encouragement of violence." Put in context, clearly my userpage is fine. Thank You. AniChai (talk) 04:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Craigslist ad controversy

Hi. I saw that you recently merged Craigslist ad controversy with Internet privacy. I personally don't think that in this case the redirect is necessary, as the incident was never referred to by that title and as one user pointed out, the title was vague and could refer to a number of incidents involving Craigslist. It was a poor choice of title, and I think that the redirect should be deleted.--Urban Rose 15:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm... I guess you do have a point. I kind of zapped that part of the debate. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 16:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Requesting an Editor Review

Hi, you opposed my last RFA at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gary King a few weeks ago. I have decided to open an Editor Review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Gary King so I could receive a new assessment for my recent activity on Wikipedia. I would greatly appreciate it if you could take the time to look over my recent contributions and point out areas where I could improve. Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 04:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

AniChai

Have you thought of opening a RfC for her conduct at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct? I have been told on the MfD of his user page that I should do this, but I feel that I don't know this editor enough to open it myself. --Enric Naval (talk) 02:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Margaret Rhodes

Please do not remove CSD tags from articles, as you did with Margaret Rhodes (artist). If you do not believe them to be valid, please add the hangon tag beneath the deletion tag, and explain why on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. If you think the article should stay, then I would thoroughly recommend rewriting it so that it no longer appears to be a copyright violation. Thank you, StephenBuxton (talk) 12:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Van Veldhoven Syndrome

Hi, Pascal. I nominated the article for AfD as a blatant WP:HOAX. I wasn't sure whether to tag it for speedy delete as vandalism or go via the AfD route. Should I have gone ahead and tagged it for speedy after finding no citations on PubMed and ScienceDirect? Thanks for any input, Nk.sheridan   Talk 22:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

excuse me

what were you thinking deleting my article Small Sluts, Nice Butts. That fine article was vetted by no fewer than 3 other admints. JeanLatore (talk) 03:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Vetted? I don't think so. One removed a speedy tag, the other a prod tag because you had contested it. The fact remains that the article was essentially empty and that this is a completely insignificant porn series. If you want to recreate it, you can always go to deletion review but I can assure you this would be a complete waste of your time. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 21:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I am requesting feedback here: Wikipedia:Editor_review/JeanLatore. Thank yu. JeanLatore (talk) 01:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Well said

Very well said. A point that I tried to make (but did so much less elegantly). --JayHenry (talk) 02:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Removing backlinks

Please don't make edits like [15]; thank you. --NE2 07:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

American liberals

In view of the fact that Category:Liberals has been retained, and that I moved lots of articles from that cat to Category:American liberals, if you could temporarily bring back Category:American liberals, I will put the articles into other more definitive categories so that this set of information (that these people are liberals from America]] will not be lost from WP. Thanks Hmains (talk) 03:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Motorex

I would like to write an article on them and (pending how it goes) I have another company I would also like to write an article on as well that I have not found information on. I read what you wrote, but am very new to writing articles. If you could help me be less opinionated, and more objective I would appreciate it. I am not affiliated with the company but had done some work with them. The company has been around for almost a century and I thought I would try my luck with them. I am more just excited to be able to add to Wikipedia, as I didn't know I could before, but there is alot of different pieces I have searched for and haven't found. This is only one of them. If you could bring back the article so I could try again I would appreciate it. Thanks for the reply on my talk page. Hope to hear from you again. :) Motorex (talk) 05:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Intelligent clothing

An article that you have been involved in editing, Intelligent clothing, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent clothing (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

happy Admin Day to fellow Québecer Pascal!

Wishing Pascal.Tesson a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! RobNS 03:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Best wishes from Canada   ;-)   --RobNS 03:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

MIB School of Management

I have re-edited the page in order to avoid copyright violations. As I was asked by the school to prepare this page there was no 'real' violation anyhow I undestand your position. Now this should be ok. Let me know. --Roberto.pugliese (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Deadly Echoes was not released by any major, but it will be released soon. I understand your position, but I think there are not so many bands in that genre that are still working or that are having a good activity like STQ-3. If you have any suggestion in order not to delete this page,please let me know. —Misc prog 12:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

deleting STQ-3

Hello. Deadly Echoes was not released by any major, but it will be released soon. I understand your position, but I think there are not so many bands in that genre that are still working or that are having a good activity like STQ-3. If you have any suggestion in order not to delete this page,please let me know. —Misc prog 12:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Steven Greer's page

Hi, I just wanted to inform you that somebody deleted and redirected Steven Greer's page. Please take the appropriate steps to undo this change. Can we put a protection on this page in order to prevent it from vandalism? Thank you. I-netfreedOm (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, an other admin undid the changes. I-netfreedOm (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Turtlerock1.jpg

Please. Could you restore the image so I can make an attempt to save it? Philly jawn (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Kaenon Polarized

Hello Pascal, First & foremost, please don't be so demeaning & condescending when you are reviewing user posts especially when you are incorrect. Thanks in advance.

So I am curious as to why my page was deleted. I stated that I am not an employee of the company (I'm not) and just a passionate user of their products and that many of my facts were taken from the company website. I was in the process of adding factual information such as athletes & celebrities that use their products. Furthermore, the entry was extremely similar to the page of Oakley Inc, who is one of their competitors. Why is Oakley allowed to have a page but Kaenon is not? Especially considering that the Oakley page mentioned much information about the founders, revenue, etc - that seems pretty self-fulfilling if you ask me!

Zooch76 (talk) 04:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)Zach