Jump to content

Talk:My Coke Rewards: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Bobbybbbbb - "sharing coke codes: new section"
Line 36: Line 36:
Anybody want to share their coke codes, I'm here for ya.
Anybody want to share their coke codes, I'm here for ya.
Give me all you got. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bobbybbbbb|Bobbybbbbb]] ([[User talk:Bobbybbbbb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bobbybbbbb|contribs]]) 17:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Give me all you got. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bobbybbbbb|Bobbybbbbb]] ([[User talk:Bobbybbbbb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bobbybbbbb|contribs]]) 17:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
http://www.fanpop.com/spots/coke/links/828294

Revision as of 17:53, 13 June 2008

WikiProject iconSouth Dakota Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBusiness Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

controversy section

This section pretty much descends into waffle and personal speculation; I'm considering just deleting the second half of it, but could anyone who knows something about the case in question clean it up? Is the section even worth having; a dismissed frivolous law suit is a bit of a storm in a teacup, rather than a full "controversy" wimbledon andy 13:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added [citation needed] to sentence "However, it is important to note that many people drink Coke and are not obese because they take care of themselves and don't blame their personal failures on a soda" Stupidone0 (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not all codes working

There are many codes that are not working. I have also 12 pack cans codes that are not working. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saudiqbal (talkcontribs)

Okay, what's your point? Termin8er850 22:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why dont you type it in right instead of B***HING ABOUT IT  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.184.103.203 (talk) 22:00:42, August 19, 2007 (UTC) 
Why don't we stop making personal attacks and stop using the talk page as an internet forum to post random thoughts. SabarCont 10:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

iCoke expansion

Can the section on iCoke be expanded to include more details, such as limited brands (only on Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, and Coca-Cola Zero) or additional points opportunities (eg. Empire Theatres scratch cards)? --24.78.124.8 (talk) 22:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Limitations section

I fixed some parts of the limitations section, removing parts that were not true (you dont have to drink large quantities rapidy to accrue massive points; just be active once every 90 days), and I also referenced the terms and conditions from the Coke rewards web site. I think we can remove the flag that this section needs references now :) Slyfield (talk) 19:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The limitations section is a little biased. --68.61.167.226 (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Code security section

In this section is a quote of something Justin Hearn said 'privately'. If it was said privately, what's it doing on wikipedia? Is 'privately' just a bad justification for not including a reference? Does anybody know more about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelastic (talkcontribs) 13:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sharing coke codes

Anybody want to share their coke codes, I'm here for ya. Give me all you got. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbybbbbb (talkcontribs) 17:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC) http://www.fanpop.com/spots/coke/links/828294[reply]