Jump to content

User talk:SlimVirgin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Julia1987 (talk | contribs)
Julia1987 (talk | contribs)
Line 44: Line 44:


few more sources: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U03h2oEZd0], [http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2007/12/another-al-dura-fraud-jamals-scars-not.html],[http://www.menapress.com/categories.php?op=newindex&catid=2],[http://canadiancoalition.com/forum/messages/9758.shtml], [http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/wounds_of_mohamed_alduras_fath/] --[[User:Julia1987|Julia1987]] ([[User talk:Julia1987|talk]]) 03:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
few more sources: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U03h2oEZd0], [http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2007/12/another-al-dura-fraud-jamals-scars-not.html],[http://www.menapress.com/categories.php?op=newindex&catid=2],[http://canadiancoalition.com/forum/messages/9758.shtml], [http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/wounds_of_mohamed_alduras_fath/] --[[User:Julia1987|Julia1987]] ([[User talk:Julia1987|talk]]) 03:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

and Haaretz report: [http://www.think-israel.org/schwartz.aldura.html] --[[User:Julia1987|Julia1987]] ([[User talk:Julia1987|talk]]) 03:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:43, 14 June 2008

War on Bad Writing
1. There is no such word as "incivil." You can be uncivil, and you can be accused of incivility, but you cannot be incivil.
2. There is definitely no such word as "definately."



RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Israeli TV report

[1] - I was wrong it is Tel-Hashomer hospital not Ashkelon. It is ax wounds not knife. The scars are from 1994. France -2 has presented these scars in one of it's follow-up report (about the trial) – trying to use them to prove their point that a-dura was shot by IDF. Israel Ch. 10 who brought the doctors report is very cautions and ending the story with the words: "the fact that al-dura lied about the scars is still no proof that the incident is tagged, the kid is alive as some claim and that France -2 knowingly published a wrong report. However, it raises serious questions about the authenticity of Jamal A Dura story."--Julia1987 (talk) 03:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

few more sources: [2], [3],[4],[5], [6] --Julia1987 (talk) 03:37, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and Haaretz report: [7] --Julia1987 (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]