Jump to content

Talk:Livonian Order: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 48: Line 48:
* I oppose the move because in Wikipedia we should prefer "[[WP:NAME|what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize]], with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity," and not what is academically correct. Neither "Teutonic Order in Livonia" nor "Livonian branch of the Teutonic Knights" are the most common names for the organization in question. A redirect from those titles to "Livonian Order" will suffice. --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 19:20, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
* I oppose the move because in Wikipedia we should prefer "[[WP:NAME|what the greatest number of English speakers would most easily recognize]], with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity," and not what is academically correct. Neither "Teutonic Order in Livonia" nor "Livonian branch of the Teutonic Knights" are the most common names for the organization in question. A redirect from those titles to "Livonian Order" will suffice. --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 19:20, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
**You say "reasonable minimum of ambiguity" but Encarta[http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_762508929/livonian_order.html] ascribes "Livonian Order" to the [[Livonian Brothers of the Sword]]. Strictly correct or not, that's a bit more than a minimum of ambiguity. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">[[User talk:AjaxSmack|<font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">''' AjaxSmack '''</font>]]</span> 05:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
**You say "reasonable minimum of ambiguity" but Encarta[http://uk.encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_762508929/livonian_order.html] ascribes "Livonian Order" to the [[Livonian Brothers of the Sword]]. Strictly correct or not, that's a bit more than a minimum of ambiguity. — <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">[[User talk:AjaxSmack|<font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">''' AjaxSmack '''</font>]]</span> 05:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Please <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;">[[User talk:AjaxSmack|<font style="color:#fef;background:navy;">''' AjaxSmack '''</font>]]</span> would you mind reading some of the refs and books provided above instead of referring to Encarta that has not got it right this time. --[[User:Termer|Termer]] ([[User talk:Termer|talk]]) 15:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:13, 14 June 2008

WikiProject iconEstonia B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconLivonian Order is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / Baltic states / European / German / Medieval / Crusades Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
Baltic states military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
German military history task force
Taskforce icon
Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
Taskforce icon
Crusades task force
WikiProject iconFormer countries Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMiddle Ages Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Livonian OrderTeutonic Order in Livonia. — The current name of this article is not clear and definetly should be changed. This military organization was not a separate military order, as Teutonic Order or Order of Malta. It was just a part (although largely autonomous part) of Teutonic Order. Moreover, the term Livonian Order is often used for the Livonian Brothers of the Sword [1]. The so-called list of masters of the Livonian Order is actually the list of Teutonic masters of Livonia, see German article. — Albert Krantz (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I'm more inclined toward Livonian branch of the Teutonic Knights, personally. Olessi (talk) 02:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree with Olessi. One real historian lectured me against using term "Livonian Order" and said it be "Livonian branch of the Teutonic Knights." Renata (talk) 05:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, the correct full name for this stuf in German is Landmeisterschaft des Deutschen Ordens in Livland. My English is rather poor to translate. — Jón Þórunn (talk) 07:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Support any move to reduce confusion with the Livonian Brothers of the Sword which has made the interwikis a mess (but now hopefully fixed). I would also go as far as to make Livonian Order a disambiguation page since some languages refer to the Livonian Brothers of the Sword as the Livonian Order (e.g., lv:Livonijas ordenis, lt:Livonijos ordinas) and there is the reasonable possibility of confusion in English. — AjaxSmack 01:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Those two article in lv and lt do not differentiate between the two. English used to also not differentiate until just few months ago. Renata (talk) 01:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely why a disambiguation page is in order. — AjaxSmack 03:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I totally object making Livonian Order into dab page. It is a very popular link, which 90% of the time refers to "Livonian branch of the Teutonic Knights." Since there are only two pages to disambiguate a simple hatnote should do the trick. Renata (talk) 04:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Normally I would agree with the hatnote solution but where would "Livonian Order" redirect? The are a number examples of it being used as shorthand for Livonian Brothers of the Sword. In addition to the Encarta article noted in the nomination[2], a brief web search turns up "The knights in 1202 had founded the ORDER OF THE BRETHREN OF THE SWORD, commonly referred to as the Livonian Order."[3] and "the Order of the Brothers of the Sword (Schwertbrüderorden), also known as the Knights of the Sword, or the Livonian Order."[4] I'm not sure where the 90% figure comes from or what "it is a very popular link" means but isn't this sufficient evidence to question the redirect target? If not, I will defer to those more familiar with the topic but I hope a move from the current title can proceed regardless of this discussion. — AjaxSmack 15:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-the Livonian Order (until 1237 the Order of the Knights of the Sword), @ Miniature empires By James Minahan ISBN:0313306109
-Swordbrothers were incorporated into the German Order in 1237, henceforth known as the Livonian Order @ The Latvians: A Short History By Andrejs Plakans
--Termer (talk) 02:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, is a sign for Teutonic Order. — Jón Þórunn (talk) 09:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Yes Jón Þórunn, it is the sign of Teutonic Order as well as the sign of the Livonian order since it was a part of it even though autonomous. The sign that you gave to the Livonian Order here in the article belonged to the Swordbrothers and it wasn't used after 1237. In fact all remaining swordbrothers that joined the Teutonic order had to change their mantles with the red sword and cross to the black cross on the site.--Termer (talk) 05:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please AjaxSmack would you mind reading some of the refs and books provided above instead of referring to Encarta that has not got it right this time. --Termer (talk) 15:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]