Talk:Labworth Café: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Dubious claim |
Oneblackline (talk | contribs) Building different from bridges. |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Dubious== |
==Dubious== |
||
''"it is the only example of the engineer Arup's architectural designs"''. No it isn't; [[Kingsgate Bridge]], for example, was designed by Arup as architect. [[User:DWaterson|DWaterson]] ([[User talk:DWaterson|talk]]) 21:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC) |
''"it is the only example of the engineer Arup's architectural designs"''. No it isn't; [[Kingsgate Bridge]], for example, was designed by Arup as architect. [[User:DWaterson|DWaterson]] ([[User talk:DWaterson|talk]]) 21:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
:The source probably means that it's the only building designed entirely by Arup. The [[Kingsgate Bridge]] may also be designed entirely by Arup, but it exists as a bridge rather than a thing generally known as a building. I suppose there's a small possibility that another building might exist, but until that time (and with respect to the clear intention but ambiguous wording from the author at images of England) I think it would be appropriate to edit the article accordingly. If another source exists which refutes the truth of the new statement then I'm more than willing to amend the article. [[User:Oneblackline|Oneblackline]] ([[User talk:Oneblackline|talk]]) 13:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:42, 16 June 2008
 | A fact from Labworth Café appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/February. |  |
Dubious
"it is the only example of the engineer Arup's architectural designs". No it isn't; Kingsgate Bridge, for example, was designed by Arup as architect. DWaterson (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- The source probably means that it's the only building designed entirely by Arup. The Kingsgate Bridge may also be designed entirely by Arup, but it exists as a bridge rather than a thing generally known as a building. I suppose there's a small possibility that another building might exist, but until that time (and with respect to the clear intention but ambiguous wording from the author at images of England) I think it would be appropriate to edit the article accordingly. If another source exists which refutes the truth of the new statement then I'm more than willing to amend the article. Oneblackline (talk) 13:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)