User talk:Cornucopia

Underbelly (TV series) and TV shows in general

Underbelly uses Template:Infobox Television. The template instructions state that the the figure used in the field "num_episodes" is "The number of episodes currently produced" and not the number of episodes that have aired. If you find other articles where somebody has mistakenly used the number of episodes that have aired you can help by correcting them. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps the people editing articles like LOST haven't read the template instructions. A lot don't. They just assume. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

What I "think" isn't really the issue. The instructions for the template are quite clear. The correct value for "num_episodes" is "The number of episodes currently produced". Have you read the instructions? --AussieLegend (talk) 15:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

As I said, perhaps the editors of those articles haven't read the instructions or they maybe they don't actually know how many episodes have been produced. --AussieLegend (talk) 02:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, the summaries probably still aren't complete as there's an argument for including some more about what the police characters do, but they're better than what they were. --BrianFG (talk) 07:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Veronica Mars failed GA nomination

Yo, unfortunately Veronica Mars does not meet the Good article criteria at this time, for reasons stated on the talkpage. If you are looking for a review of the article as opposed to GA status itself, you might want to consider submitting it to peer review. Regards, скоморохъ 13:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Underbelly info

Yes of course. I too have refs, but forgot to add them in. Here they are:

• The gangland war moves online
• Underbelly DVDs selling in Victoria
• Nine staff questioned over Underbelly leaks
• More Underbelly leaks

I'll try and work on it now.

- Allied45 (talk) 01:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Done. I've added all refs from these sources to my contributions. Cheers! - Allied45 (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Go for it. Sorry about the refs, my bad!! - Allied45 (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

TV box

We generally go by what has "aired", as that shows what was produced. Obviously, there is a difference, because shows produce episodes before they actually air, and they may produce one that never airs. Basically, we update per what airs - that's been the standard practice for a long while. Although, if you have a source that says a show produced 145 episodes in its original run, but only aired 144, then I would say 145 episodes and put the source (with an explaination) with that number.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I would say, if someone can find a reliable secondary source that verifies that all have been produced then use that to cite the number. Otherwise, just update every time a new one airs.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Discography listing

Please use the correct "wikitable" format when creating charts tables or discography tables. There shouldn't be any extra coloring, boldfacing or fonts put into these.... you can see WP:CHARTS for the basic format. Thanks. - eo (talk) 15:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Christina Milian

Hi, album covers are only allowed in album articles unless there's critical commentary of the cover. It was removed from the article for the same reason that album covers aren't allowed in discographies - see WP:FU#Unacceptable use. Unfree pics can't be used decoratively. Even if a fair use rationale was added, it would've been invalid. Spellcast (talk) 13:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Tempest

In case you didn't save the sandbox on your watchlist, I put in the the production info from the book. It still needs organizing and cleaning up, and some of it may not have enough context to stay, but that's pretty much all that was from the book.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review feedback

Hi, I noticed you have a request in at peer review which has not yet received any response besides the semi-automated script. Have you tried requesting a peer review from the volunteers list? Another idea you might want to try is to review someone else's request (particularly one from the list of requests without responses), then ask that they look at your request. Hope these are helpful suggestions and help to get some feedback for your request soon, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for the thanks on the Veronica Mars peer review. You are very welcome. I just thougt of something else and will add it next. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello!

For (Thanks for falling on my fake message!), I hereby award Cornucopia with the “Cool Award.” Lolipod (talk) 02:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Milian image fair use rationale

Hi Cornucopia. Sorry to disappoint you but I don't believe you can claim fair use on an album cover to illustrate a person. If you carefully read the template you've used, it says that the fair use can only be claimed for the recording in question, so I don't think you can use this image in her article. Have a look around on Wikimedia Commons or see if a Flickr user has an image they'd be prepared to release with the appropriate Commons licence? Sorry I can't help further. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 08:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't you dare vandalize Remember again!!

Don't you dare vandalize Remember again!! The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

82.110.149.233

Hi; the right place to report this to admins (not to a non-admin?!) is WP:AIV, for future reference... and welcome! —TreasuryTag—t—c 16:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

I am having simmilar problems with "Remember"

I barely remember (no pun intended) the episode "Remember (Desperate Housewives)" but I know it is 46th episode, and the season finale. But "Adamdeanhall" or something does not want the truth to be known, and has (judging from his or her talk page) had a history of accusing people of vandalism, unreasonable edits and such. I was wondering if you know if there is anything we can do about this to prevent future POV or unreasonable edits. I might contact someone else too. Yojimbo501 (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw your message (which "Adam" deserved) and think it's unreasonable that he is unjustly accusing people of vandalism and such. He didn't even leave a reason why he undid the edits. If you would put the cite up for disscusion on the episodes list talk page, I will go by some time and leave a comment. Thanks for responding. Yojimbo501 (talk) 03:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Has this whole thing been resolved?

I noticed on AdamDeanHalls talk page you put a section which said Thank you for considering our point of view. Does that mean there is no point pursuing the whole Remember number of episodes problem? Has it been resolved? Well, if it has, it hasbeen nice doing buisness with you. Yojimbo501 (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

30 Rock

Thanks for volenteering to help. I think we should start with the prose and references. -- Jamie jca (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't think the table really works because its just pretty much a copy of what was written above it. -- Jamie jca (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

The Rural Juror

Yeah, its pretty good but each section needs to be in paragraph form rather than bullets. Have a look at Pilot (30 Rock) or SeinfeldVision for a guideline. Also, use {{Cite web}} (for reviews) and {{Cite news}} (for news sources) for your references. You will also need some production information. Instances of The Rural Juror, when refaring to the film NOT the episode, should be in italics. Style the lead after the above mentioned episodes articles. A plot section will be needed of no more than 220 words (10 words per minute of duration). If you can't be bothered going through the episode for continuity, thats okay. I'll write the awards section for you once it's been moved to the mainspace, I can also add a screenshot. Also, try and use notable critics for reviews, the rule I use personally is that if the site the review is hosted on doesn't have a wikipedia pagem or it's user generated, it's not notable. Thanks for helping with the 30 Rock articles. -- Jamie jca (talk) 22:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I see you figured it out. -- Jamie jca (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Editing War: List of Desperate Housewives episodes

My competitor Special:Contributions/213.42.23.71 and I are in an editing war, and it is about List of Desperate Housewives episodes. Could you please do something about this?! If we keep this up, we'll both be blocked from Wikipedia!! AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey whats happened with Adam Dean Hall?

Maybe you didn't see it somehow but I'm ust curious as to what the scope is with Adam. Has this all been resolved? Is Remember stable now? Thanks. Yojimbo501 (talk) 15:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah... I think it is resolved. Adam left a note saying he'd be banned if he edited it again (which I don't think is apropriate, but I wont get into that). Well, hope its all been resolved. Yojimbo501 (talk) 23:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

No kidding. ;) Yojimbo501 (talk) 00:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Good job!

Nice work on No Such Thing as Vampires. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Your age

The reason you post that your birthday is December 14 but neglect to post the year is obviously because you are under 13. --TIB (talk) 10:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Then act your age, not your shoe size. --TIB (talk) 12:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

“ Please leave Wikipedia and never come back. Seriously, go home. No one wants you here. ”

Look who's talking, now! --TIB (talk) 12:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

The human brain?

Hey, read your userpage, and thought it was a little harder to read than those jumbled-up letter things usually are! Turns out your words aren't actually written with the first and last letters in the right place ;) —97198 talk 13:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm up for the challenge! :D —97198 talk 13:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Underbelly

I've been trying to find the production information for sometime but have failed to find anything. :( I'll keep at it though. :)Bidgee (talk) 11:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Cassie's second studio album, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Image size

Per the image use policy, we shouldn't override the default size with a specified image size. Since you're registered you have the option to set your own preferences for image size. Go to "My preferences" and select "Files", there you can reset the default image size for the "thumb" setting. You can go as high as 300px.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 20:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Generally, the only image that needs to be specified is the image in the lead, because it's typically the image that should stand out the most, and the default size (180 px) would be too small. If you adjust your personal preferences it won't be small anymore. Mine are set to 250 px. Their reasoning is that it may be small to you, but someone with a different resolution might see an image that is quite large. So, if the default for them is 180 px, and it appears large because of their personal resolution settings on their computer, then when you specify a specific size of "250 px" then it appears far too large to the other readers. Then they say, "this is too large", and then respecify the image to a smaller size that looks better for them. By making is a default, non-specified size, and having registered users set their own preferences you reduce the risk of this.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 04:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Glad I could be of help. I never knew about the image specifying until recently. I was always resizing everything to 250px too.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 04:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Cassie (singer) in Roc Boys

Actually....Cassie does background vocals in the song. It's even in the booklet. [1] ≈Alessandro ♫ ^{T • C} 05:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

I didn't think it was notable enough to be in the article either, that's why I didn't put it back in. ≈Alessandro ♫ ^{T • C} 05:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Remy Zero

If you got the image from FlickR, you should see about determing the actual copyright and seeing if the image was a personal capture that could be released in the public domain so that it would be free.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, the person that posted it on FlickR isn't the owner apparently. Given that everyone in the image is living, I would assume that you could not claim that there is "no free alternative". Someone has a picture of Remy Zero, we just have to find a free copy of one - whether that comes with the Smallville cast or not.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

You couldn't if they were all alive. The idea behind WP:BLP images is that we can't use screen captures from films to depict actors in their infobox, because they are living and someone can easily snap a picture of them. The fact that no one has snapped a picture is irrelevant to the idea that it could easly be done. The same could be said for this image, but we'll see what the reaction is. The real copyright for the image is listed here. This user nicely provides all the relevant info for the picture. I mean, you could contact the supposed owner of the picture (David Gray) and find out if he would release it under the GDFL. But that's your decision.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations to you too. I never said that it didn't have enough real world information, that answer I already knew. I said that it didn't have a lot of reviews. I mean, none of them are USA Today, or any other highly respectable new organization. I think it would have a hard time getting through and FAC process without a beefed up Reception section.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:06, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, I've noticed that the Moonlight episode titles are "Moonlight episode". Per naming conventions they should be simply "Moonlight", unless several objects share the same name and have articles. For instance, there is Serenity (Firefly episode) Serenity (Firefly vessel) and Serenity (film), plus a couple others. I've put in a request to delete the articles that are "(Moonlight)", because they already exist and are redirected to the LOE page. When that is complete (within a day or so), then the current articles need to be moved.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I've taken care of the name changes, no need to worry about it.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Be careful what you add or fix today, since I'm going to work right now and I'll be working on the page there. I work on it in WORD, and then send it to myself back at home where I upload the finished stuff everyday. Just forewarning in case you add or change something, as it could get lost when I upload the newer version.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The Rural Juror GA on hold

Heads up. Sorry about all the complaints suggestions! I might've got a little carried away there, but anywho, have some fun :) —97198 talk 09:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Looking forward to it! :D —97198 talk 13:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Rural Juror

Well done on getting The Rural Juror to GA. -- Jamie jca (talk) 22:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Your previous account

Did I know you? –thedemonhog talk • edits 05:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Then sorry that I did not leave a message begging you to come back.  :) –thedemonhog talk • edits 06:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Oooooh, I get it know (who you are). I never understood why your previous account left so suddenly and was confused by his "death". –thedemonhog talk • edits 06:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC) P.S. I notice that your identities are different ages.

List of Moonlight episodes

I left comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Moonlight episodes a few days ago. I was just wondering if you had realized, as List of Moonlight episodes hasn't changed, or whether you are unable to follow through with the FLC. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk · contribs · count · email) 06:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Kara

I don't think so. It was very brief, barely making a dent in the overall story of the show. It was only a couple of episodes long, and never a whole episode by itself. It's probably more important in Jimmy's section, as it somewhat affected his relationship with Chloe. It really did nothing for Kara.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, heading to work again, so be careful what you add. I try to look at the history first before I upload the newer version, but sometimes there's a bit too much to adjust in one sitting.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Want to know something crappy? I pulled up the most recent version of the page at work; I cleaned up Jimmy and expanded a bit on him; I finished Pete's section completely and then I saved it all. Well, it saved to some temporary folder (as I opened it from an email) and I cannot find the folder. So it's ALL GONE...lol. I was so pissed.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 15:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

I was at work, but I don't know the title of the folder. I know from experience that unless you specifically save it to a folder with "Save As", then it automatically saves it to some temporary folder...a folder that I don't know where it is. I'm going to try and search for the file name though when I get back to work this morning. So, hopefully not all is lost.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 10:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Not really. There are still 14 source that are errored out, which need to be filled out. I think I have a good quote box for Pete's section I want to add. I was also wondering if characters like Victoria Hardwick, Henry Small, and others with no real world information and very weak (short) story arcs need to be mentioned.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

What do you also think about having a third section that merely lists actors and parts. This way, we don't have to deal with "How come this person isn't on the list, they were in 3 episodes" (speaking more specifically to those doctors that appeared multiple times, but did relatively nothing, but also including people like Victoria and Henry, who don't really do anything special themselves on the show). Thoughts? It could be like "Other characters" or something else.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 16:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

That's kind of the reason I like keeping this in the sandbox for a bit longer, so that we can weed out little details (that actually comprise big results) out. I say we first create the list and list every actor (and their character) who appeared more than 1 time. Then we can see what we find and if we think no one will notice John Doe because he was in the background the entire time and was never officially talked to...then we'll pull him out.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 20:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

A table would take up a lot of space in the article, and be slightly out of place with all the rest of the article. I was thinking of using the two column structure, similar to how Arrested Development has their guest list. That's a rather extensive list that only really comprises about 5 kb of space.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't matter. I'm actually watching Ultimate Fighter right now. If you haven't done it in half an hour, then I'll go ahead and start it. I would start on season 1 characters and grab every name that appears in more than one episode. Then just go through the season character pages. At least, that's what I'll do in 30 minutes if it's not already done. You could work on the rest of the references as well, if you'd prefer that.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Looking at the list, you think we should go ahead and include all the one episode characters as well on the right side? The page is "Characters of Smallville".  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 04:10, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't think I'll put episode citations there. Nothing plot related is being mentioned, it's merely a list saying this person appeared on the show. They can check IMDb, or watch the show for the opening credits of they need to. I mean, if secondary sources can be found listing all these episodes for each actor, great, but to me it isn't necessary because it isn't something that is controversial.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 04:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

When we finish the "Other characters" we can move it. I finished the first season (I use the actors that the companion books felt were relevant enough to list in the "guest stars" section of each episode). Question, this has been bugging me. How should we classify "Recurring character"? I'm really thinking that if you appear twice, but not as a recurring plot--or as a background character like a doctor--then you're really just a guest star. For instance, Kyle Gallner (Bart), Lee Thompson Young (Victor), and Alan Ritchson (AC) are really just guest stars that happened to appear in two episodes. It wasn't like they were popping up regularly (like Ethan or Sheriff Adams), or had a short story arc (like Victoria and Henry). What do you think? I think we should probably have some definition so that the sections reflect some form of accuracy as far as who is recurring and who is simply a special guest. (P.S. I'll try and finish the rest of the list. I don't have seasons 2 and 3 with me, I left them at work, but I can do 4, 5, and 6 now). Also, don't worry about adjusting the sections till they're all done, or you'll be adjusting continually until they are done. Last note, I was adding EVERYONE that the book listed, but I fell that people like "Receptionist" and "LuthorCorp Scientist" --who probably had speaking roles--are probably so small in the episode that they really aren't "Guest stars", but more stand-ins with speaking lines. What do you think?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:44, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

I saw, I'll do that when I get the characters all in. Right now, I've got my internship for 10 hours today (starting at 11 am), and I'm fighting a terrible cold so I'm a little slow to get things done right now.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

C.o.S. Pictures

Here are some non-free pictures for the main characters without free pictures:

Tom Welling

• http://www.toutelatele.com/IMG/jpg/Tom-WELLING.jpg
• http://www.celebrityspecial.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/smallville-tom-welling-clark-kent.jpg
• http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Profiles/20061006/244.welling.tom.100506.jpg
• http://z.about.com/d/tvdramas/1/0/0/C/tomwelling.jpg

Kristen Krack

• http://home.comcast.net/~sinman6969/Auction/KristenKreuk15-8x10.jpg
• http://www.modelvolume.com/kristin_kreuk/kristin_kreuk_photos.jpg

Allison Mack

• http://www.canim.net/model-manken/images/allison-mack-1024x768-26406.jpg

Please note that these are random websites, and the real info needs to be found. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 04:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Given that the primary article for the main cast will have images from the show, I think only free images should be used for the LOC page. Since we aren't having sections full of information we probably couldn't justify the non-free images like we could on an article devoted entirely to the character. Hold on to them for the character articles though, because I can't stand that picture of Chloe that is up there right now.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

We don't need an image for any main character really, I only placed images on the page because I found a bunch of free ones. They're only there to dress up the article, and you can only dress up articles with images that are free, because non-free images have to meet the fair-use criteria. Having a non-free one simply because another characters happens to have a free one wouldn't be justification. I actually removed Jensen Ackles image because it was crammed in there between Aaron and Erica.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 05:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I've been doing this for a month already (hence why I'm slow in getting the page to the mainspace). Thanks for the good health wish. Get this though, I had season 5 characters done. I mean, flat out done. I went to hit "save page" and the damn power went out and I lost it all. This just isn't my week.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

So You Think You Can Dance Australia (season 1)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of So You Think You Can Dance Australia (season 1), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: So You Think You Can Dance Australia. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:ChristinaMilianSmallville.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ChristinaMilianSmallville.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NrDg 01:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:MilianandDre.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:MilianandDre.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NrDg 01:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ChristinaMilianSmallville.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ChristinaMilianSmallville.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MilianandDre.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MilianandDre.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Episodes of DH

I'm sorry but you're wrong ! The episode 100 will be the episode 13 oh the Season 5 ! So it means that season 2 has 24 episodes ! Please stop change the episodes numbers ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.50.12.207 (talk) 12:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I was not aware of that. Do you have a reference that proves that? Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 12:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

So, there is not any reference because it's logical ! I'm happy to see that you agree ! Because nobody believes me, such as AdamDeanHall, who believes that he's the king of wikipedia ! Thanks =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.50.12.207 (talk) 15:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)