Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moneyfacts.co.uk: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Darrenhusted (talk | contribs) |
Jasynnash2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 15:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 15:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' The primary source is fine, the second Alexa source neither confirms nor contradicts the article and is useless, and the third Wikia source reads like an advert. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 15:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' The primary source is fine, the second Alexa source neither confirms nor contradicts the article and is useless, and the third Wikia source reads like an advert. [[User:Darrenhusted|Darrenhusted]] ([[User talk:Darrenhusted|talk]]) 15:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Speedy Delete''' The article is blatant advertising with no actual references and only external links to help sell the subject. [[User:Jasynnash2|Jasynnash2]] ([[User talk:Jasynnash2|talk]]) 15:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:38, 19 June 2008
- Moneyfacts.co.uk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nominated for speedy and declined. Non-notable company/website, spammy, no reliable sources. Re-creation of a previous article that has been deleted as spam THREE times (albeit with a different title). ukexpat (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The primary source is fine, the second Alexa source neither confirms nor contradicts the article and is useless, and the third Wikia source reads like an advert. Darrenhusted (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete The article is blatant advertising with no actual references and only external links to help sell the subject. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)