Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FL2 Interactive: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Nominating FL2 Interactive for deletion (using Huggle) |
FormIsEmpty (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|FL2 Interactive}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:FL2 Interactive|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FL2 Interactive]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FL2 Interactive|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 19#{{anchorencode:FL2 Interactive}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|FL2 Interactive}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:FL2 Interactive|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FL2 Interactive]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FL2 Interactive|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 19#{{anchorencode:FL2 Interactive}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
I would keep an eye on this for a few days... as it stands now its a CSD but it could be legit if more external sources and other stuff keeps get added to it to meet WP:CORP. I dont want to CSD it just yet so I'm opening an AFD for this article. [[User:Katanada|Katanada]] ([[User talk:Katanada|talk]]) 15:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC) |
I would keep an eye on this for a few days... as it stands now its a CSD but it could be legit if more external sources and other stuff keeps get added to it to meet WP:CORP. I dont want to CSD it just yet so I'm opening an AFD for this article. [[User:Katanada|Katanada]] ([[User talk:Katanada|talk]]) 15:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
'''Not trying to spam but...''' |
|||
What would you suggest? I tried to model this after what Crispin Porter & Bogusky has done and their section is approved. |
|||
Revision as of 16:06, 19 June 2008
- FL2 Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I would keep an eye on this for a few days... as it stands now its a CSD but it could be legit if more external sources and other stuff keeps get added to it to meet WP:CORP. I dont want to CSD it just yet so I'm opening an AFD for this article. Katanada (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Not trying to spam but... What would you suggest? I tried to model this after what Crispin Porter & Bogusky has done and their section is approved.