Talk:Java class loader: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→References?: No software patents in the EU? Ideally, yes... |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=3&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Krohn%2C+Petri%22.IN.&OS=IN/ Handling different service versions in a server]. It's originally from around 1999, and if I remember correctly, there is a Finnish/[[European patent]] issued. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] 23:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC) |
[http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=3&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Krohn%2C+Petri%22.IN.&OS=IN/ Handling different service versions in a server]. It's originally from around 1999, and if I remember correctly, there is a Finnish/[[European patent]] issued. -- [[User:Petri Krohn|Petri Krohn]] 23:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
: In the EU there are no software patents. --[[Special:Contributions/80.99.1.94|80.99.1.94]] ([[User talk:80.99.1.94|talk]]) 14:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC) |
: In the EU there are no software patents. --[[Special:Contributions/80.99.1.94|80.99.1.94]] ([[User talk:80.99.1.94|talk]]) 14:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
:: Yes, there are. Read the Wikipedia article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents#Europe| Software Patents#Europe], specifically: |
|||
:::Article 52 EPC excludes "programs for computers" from patentability (Art. 52(2)) to the extent that a patent application relates to a computer program "as such" (Art. 52(3)). This has been interpreted to mean that any invention which makes a non-obvious "technical contribution" or solves a "technical problem" in a non-obvious way is patentable even if that technical problem is solved by running a computer program. |
|||
:: [[Special:Contributions/203.193.119.196|203.193.119.196]] ([[User talk:203.193.119.196|talk]]) 23:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
This article contains some interesting external references. [[User:Wikimsd|Wikimsd]] 10:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
This article contains some interesting external references. [[User:Wikimsd|Wikimsd]] 10:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:31, 22 June 2008
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-12-04. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Deletion of JAR hell
I noticed that this paged had been marked for deletion, so I gave it a shot. My first contribution, so comments, etc., welcomed. DenaDweller 00:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
References?
It is not appropriate to link to one's own work, but here is a link that may be relevant to JAR hell case #3: It is US patent application number 20030167349, named Handling different service versions in a server. It's originally from around 1999, and if I remember correctly, there is a Finnish/European patent issued. -- Petri Krohn 23:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- In the EU there are no software patents. --80.99.1.94 (talk) 14:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, there are. Read the Wikipedia article on Software Patents#Europe, specifically:
- Article 52 EPC excludes "programs for computers" from patentability (Art. 52(2)) to the extent that a patent application relates to a computer program "as such" (Art. 52(3)). This has been interpreted to mean that any invention which makes a non-obvious "technical contribution" or solves a "technical problem" in a non-obvious way is patentable even if that technical problem is solved by running a computer program.
- 203.193.119.196 (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, there are. Read the Wikipedia article on Software Patents#Europe, specifically:
This article contains some interesting external references. Wikimsd 10:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)