Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Hosler: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jasynnash2 (talk | contribs)
Habashia (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:
*'''delete''' per nom, ONEEVENT, NOT#NEWS. I had assumed this was a hoax after reading the article, but Columbus Dispatch article Keithh links above seems legit (note that her legal name seems to be Jewel Hosler...) [[User:Pete.Hurd|Pete.Hurd]] ([[User talk:Pete.Hurd|talk]]) 05:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''delete''' per nom, ONEEVENT, NOT#NEWS. I had assumed this was a hoax after reading the article, but Columbus Dispatch article Keithh links above seems legit (note that her legal name seems to be Jewel Hosler...) [[User:Pete.Hurd|Pete.Hurd]] ([[User talk:Pete.Hurd|talk]]) 05:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''delete''' this article. Shouldn't be "moved" to Cucumber Incident but, information from this article could be included in a new article about the event if appropriate. [[User:Jasynnash2|Jasynnash2]] ([[User talk:Jasynnash2|talk]]) 10:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''delete''' this article. Shouldn't be "moved" to Cucumber Incident but, information from this article could be included in a new article about the event if appropriate. [[User:Jasynnash2|Jasynnash2]] ([[User talk:Jasynnash2|talk]]) 10:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I don't know how notable the incident is, but clearly we don't need an article about Ms Hosler.--[[User:Habashia|Habashia]] ([[User talk:Habashia|talk]]) 16:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:14, 23 June 2008

Julie Hosler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article has existed as a poorly-sourced biography for several years. Given WP:BLP & WP:ONEEVENT, perhaps this should be deleted. I found a general lack of substantial, readily-available reliable sources via Google News or a more general search (and, no, cannot believe that I did google searches for "Julie Hosler cucumber", either)...I don't think the Sundance Channel documentary[1][2] is sufficient enough to warrant encyclopedic coverage, no matter how odd the case. — Scientizzle 23:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have no strong feelings one way or another, but it does seem that the story raised issues a couple of months ago in Ohio:

Sexual offender registry challenged I agree that I didn't find much about the story either. Perhaps this should just be an article about the movie? My $0.02. Keithh (talk) 23:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]