Talk:Touch (sport): Difference between revisions
m Talk:Federation of International Touch (rugby) moved to Talk:Touch football (rugby league) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I have moved this article from Touch Rugby to this name because for many people Touch rugby is what is described above. After the edits made by [[user:131.244.3.45]] 06:31, 9 Mar 2005 the article had become exclusivly about FIT so it is better that it has it's own article. [[User:Philip Baird Shearer|Philip Baird Shearer]] 09:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC) |
I have moved this article from Touch Rugby to this name because for many people Touch rugby is what is described above. After the edits made by [[user:131.244.3.45]] 06:31, 9 Mar 2005 the article had become exclusivly about FIT so it is better that it has it's own article. [[User:Philip Baird Shearer|Philip Baird Shearer]] 09:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC) |
||
:Still not quite right - it's called Touch football (already taken) or just Touch. -- [[User:*Paul*|Paul]] 18:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
:Still not quite right - it's called Touch football (already taken) or just Touch. -- [[User:*Paul*|Paul]] 18:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
||
Gee i hate this touch football stuff. This article's title, should not have in brakets (rugby league). It should, as it does, mention that it was derived from rugby league. We dont put "rugby" or "rugby union" in brakets after the rugby league's title, so why here? Hmm.. I'm going to brain storm about this for a while i think. |
|||
Revision as of 04:50, 30 August 2005
A distinction needs to be made between actual Touch Football http://www.internationaltouch.com.au/ and what appears to be a muck around game "A common time for it to be played is as an end of training session on the day before an important rugby game, to reduce to a minimum the chances of an accidental injury"
Good on 131.244.3.45 for fixing this up.
I have moved this article from Touch Rugby to this name because for many people Touch rugby is what is described above. After the edits made by user:131.244.3.45 06:31, 9 Mar 2005 the article had become exclusivly about FIT so it is better that it has it's own article. Philip Baird Shearer 09:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
- Still not quite right - it's called Touch football (already taken) or just Touch. -- Paul 18:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Gee i hate this touch football stuff. This article's title, should not have in brakets (rugby league). It should, as it does, mention that it was derived from rugby league. We dont put "rugby" or "rugby union" in brakets after the rugby league's title, so why here? Hmm.. I'm going to brain storm about this for a while i think.