Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commune Ango: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:22, 29 June 2008

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Coeur Saignant. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commune Ango

Procedural Nomination for article re-PROD'd after having had a declined PROD. There are two main concerns: a) verifiability of the place's existence and b) notability of the place. It is my understanding that if an inhabited place is verifiable, that place is intrinsically notable. However, it has been a while since I have been involved in a debate on that matter and consensus may have changed. Thanks for your input. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because the reason for AfD, edit history and editors involved are essentially identical:

Comment The first appears to exist and I think that provides inherent notability as that consensus has not changed as far as I'm aware. The latter gets a lot of false positives, something philosophical? _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 04:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All - Consensus has not changed on the inherent notability of towns/villages/population centers (I can't imagine it ever changing). All appear to exist. [1][2][3][4] --Oakshade (talk) 05:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''deleted, see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Coeur Saignant]]'''. [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] ([[User talk:Gwen Gale|talk]]) 17:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 ===[[Commune Ango]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}}
 :{{la|Commune Ango}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Commune Ango|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commune Ango]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commune Ango|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 29#{{anchorencode:Commune Ango}}|View log]])</noinclude>
@@ Line 13: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Comment''' The first [http://www.geonames.org/935962/commune-carron.html appears to exist] and I think that provides inherent notability as that consensus has not changed as far as I'm aware. The latter gets a lot of false positives, something philosophical? <sub>[[User_talk:Travellingcari|TravellingCari]]</sub><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Travellingcari|the Busy Bee]]</sup> 04:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Keep All''' - Consensus has not changed on the inherent notability of towns/villages/population centers (I can't imagine it ever changing).  All appear to exist. [http://travelingluck.com/Africa/Reunion/Reunion%20(general)/_935964_Commune+Ango.html#invest][http://travelingluck.com/Africa/Reunion/Reunion%20(general)/_935936_Desbassyns.html#invest][http://travelingluck.com/Africa/Reunion/Reunion+(general)/_935894_Fiague.html#invest][http://www.fallingrain.com/world/RE/0/Franche_Terre.html] --[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] ([[User talk:Oakshade|talk]]) 05:43, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>