Talk:Balto-Slavic peoples: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
don't delete other people's comments |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For balts it is ofensive to be called a slav. And there isn't no Balto-slavic peoples, at least there isn't no common cultural or linguistic identity. |
For balts it is ofensive to be called a slav. And there isn't no Balto-slavic peoples, at least there isn't no common cultural or linguistic identity. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Edo 555|Edo 555]] ([[User talk:Edo 555|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Edo 555|contribs]]) 08:12, 18 October 2007 </small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> |
||
Of course there are no Balto-slavic people, it's just a hypotethical term created by people who don't know any of the Baltic languages. |
|||
Offensive to you or not, Balts and Slavs are very close related linguistically, mentally and culturally. Within the Indo-european world, Balto-Slavs are on the same type of ethnic relation like Indo-Iranians are. A lonely intrudors like yourself cannot decide about the unity of Balto-Slavic nations. So, no matter if the truth is killing you or not, BaltoSlavs are reality, and they will always be. Cheers, [[Special:Contributions/24.86.110.10|24.86.110.10]] ([[User talk:24.86.110.10|talk]]) 06:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Of course there are no Balto-slavic people, it's just a hypotethical term created by people who don't know any of the Baltic languages. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:213.180.97.70|213.180.97.70]] ([[User talk:213.180.97.70|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/213.180.97.70|contribs]]) 18:18, 26 June 2008 </small><!-- Template:Unsigned2 --> |
|||
Revision as of 20:42, 3 July 2008
For balts it is ofensive to be called a slav. And there isn't no Balto-slavic peoples, at least there isn't no common cultural or linguistic identity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edo 555 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 18 October 2007
Offensive to you or not, Balts and Slavs are very close related linguistically, mentally and culturally. Within the Indo-european world, Balto-Slavs are on the same type of ethnic relation like Indo-Iranians are. A lonely intrudors like yourself cannot decide about the unity of Balto-Slavic nations. So, no matter if the truth is killing you or not, BaltoSlavs are reality, and they will always be. Cheers, 24.86.110.10 (talk) 06:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Of course there are no Balto-slavic people, it's just a hypotethical term created by people who don't know any of the Baltic languages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.180.97.70 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 26 June 2008