Talk:Novelty song: Difference between revisions
Prosfilaes (talk | contribs) →Early history: new section |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Classical|class=}} |
|||
{{Genre|class=Start}} |
{{Genre|class=Start}} |
||
{{Songs|class=Start}} |
{{Songs|class=Start}} |
Revision as of 09:16, 4 July 2008
Classical music | ||||
|
Music/Music genres task force Start‑class | |||||||
|
Songs Start‑class | |||||||
|
Wow, what's been going on over here? I can see not wanting too many examples, but now there's not hardly any, including a lot of well-known ones. Including ones that were red-linked. Which, if the criteria for talking about anything in Wikipedia is that it has to have a page of its own, well then we'd have a lot less content. Rufus Sarsaparilla 12:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
loser isn't a novelty song. people said it was but it wasn't
MUHAHAHAHA! 07:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I typed in comic song and got this, which is about novelty songs. They are not the same beast. A history of the comic song would encompass the French chanson tradition, perhaps Gilbert and Sullivan, music hall, Flanders and Swann, Tom Lehrer, maybe even Richard Stilgoe.
Not on list? Cotton-eye Joe by Rednex, some stuff by the Coasters. Don't if relevant? 137.215.9.20 (talk) 10:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Early history
This article is unclear on the early history; if this was a popular genre in the 20s and 30s, then the history section should mention that, and not start with the 40s.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)