Jump to content

Talk:Irrigation in Peru: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Page references: new section
Nomination
Line 1: Line 1:
==Nomination==
{{GA nominee|19:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)|page=1| subtopic=|status=}}

{{PeruProjectBanner|class=B|importance=mid}}
{{PeruProjectBanner|class=B|importance=mid}}
{{dyktalk|13 February|2008}}
{{dyktalk|13 February|2008}}

Revision as of 19:30, 7 July 2008

Nomination

WikiProject iconPeru B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Peru To-do:

Please, review Irrigation in Peru and share your comments regarding editing, content and/or applications. Anunezsanchez (talk) 20:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would add as an historic fact that the sharp decrease of the indigenous population following the events of the hispanic conquest (mainly due to the new diseases brought by the europeans) was a mayor contributor to the failure of the irrigation infrastructure, an analog process to what happened to mesopothamia after the mongolic and timurid conquest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.30.108.219 (talk) 21:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page references

This is a well informed and heavily referenced article which are good things. However, it desperately needs page references. Wikipedia articles are required to be verifiable thus, readers should be able to compare the article with its sources. For that it is necessary to provide page references so that readers know in what part of books or pdf documents to look for. Also, as a minor suggestion, it might be a good idea to have the "References" section above the "Sources" section as this is the standard academic practice. --Victor12 (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]