Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity (game engine): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ecoleetage (talk | contribs) Weak keep |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Weak keep''' In its current state (as of this writing), the article reads like marketing collateral and is in need of proper referencing. But a casual Google search turns up plenty of coverage in Macworld and PC World (the key media outlets for this type of product): [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22unity%22+%22game+engine%22&hl=en&um=1]. If anything, the article needs to be rewritten, not erased. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 15:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep''' In its current state (as of this writing), the article reads like marketing collateral and is in need of proper referencing. But a casual Google search turns up plenty of coverage in Macworld and PC World (the key media outlets for this type of product): [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22unity%22+%22game+engine%22&hl=en&um=1]. If anything, the article needs to be rewritten, not erased. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 15:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' The problem with text right now is the lack of citations. That can be rewritten. For non-notable part, I'm not sure how to evaluate that... Google for "unity game engine" perhaps? [http://www.google.com/search?q=unity+game+engine]. [[User:NeARAZ|NeARAZ]] ([[User talk:NeARAZ|talk]]) 15:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:47, 10 July 2008
- Unity (game engine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced and non-notable. Promotional in nature. Tan | 39 14:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep In its current state (as of this writing), the article reads like marketing collateral and is in need of proper referencing. But a casual Google search turns up plenty of coverage in Macworld and PC World (the key media outlets for this type of product): [1]. If anything, the article needs to be rewritten, not erased. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The problem with text right now is the lack of citations. That can be rewritten. For non-notable part, I'm not sure how to evaluate that... Google for "unity game engine" perhaps? [2]. NeARAZ (talk) 15:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)