Jump to content

Talk:General linear model: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requested better example
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 169.237.26.204 - "Requested better example"
Line 4: Line 4:
: No, the generalized linear model is considerably more general than the general linear model. (This is obviously not the greatest terminology, but it is standard.) -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
: No, the generalized linear model is considerably more general than the general linear model. (This is obviously not the greatest terminology, but it is standard.) -- [[User:Waltpohl|Walt Pohl]] 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


Why is the "Application" section give one example from neuroimaging that is less-than-obvious, when the GLM underlies almost all simple statistical tests and therefore has a plentiful supply of clear and easy-to-understand examples? --user: NotTires
Why is the "Application" section give one example from neuroimaging that is less-than-obvious, when the GLM underlies almost all simple statistical tests and therefore has a plentiful supply of clear and easy-to-understand examples? --user: NotTires <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/169.237.26.204|169.237.26.204]] ([[User talk:169.237.26.204|talk]]) 01:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 01:05, 12 July 2008

isn't this just the same as Generalized linear model? Gtx from the country of the football championships ;-) Frank1101 21:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the generalized linear model is considerably more general than the general linear model. (This is obviously not the greatest terminology, but it is standard.) -- Walt Pohl 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the "Application" section give one example from neuroimaging that is less-than-obvious, when the GLM underlies almost all simple statistical tests and therefore has a plentiful supply of clear and easy-to-understand examples? --user: NotTires —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.237.26.204 (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]