Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Cage (film): Difference between revisions
→Luke Cage (film): keep |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 11:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)</small> |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 11:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' - It seems that the amount of time the movie has spent in [[development hell]] is giving it more notability than some movies that ''have'' been released. Whether the movie is ever released may be irrelevant. - [[User:HouseOfScandal|House of Scandal]] ([[User talk:HouseOfScandal|talk]]) 14:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - It seems that the amount of time the movie has spent in [[development hell]] is giving it more notability than some movies that ''have'' been released. Whether the movie is ever released may be irrelevant. - [[User:HouseOfScandal|House of Scandal]] ([[User talk:HouseOfScandal|talk]]) 14:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Redirect'''. Erik has already merged the content of this article into [[Luke Cage]], and that seems perfectly acceptable to me. Consequently this article should be turned into a redirect in order to preserve the page history. [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 15:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:28, 14 July 2008
- Luke Cage (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Almost a year ago it was proposed that this article should be merged and deleted and yet nothing happened. On July 8th I proposed this article be deleted using the proposed deletion tag as it is clearly breaking the WP:FUTFILMS policy. We have no evidence that this film is still in development, let alone "confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography". On the 12th an anonymous IP address user removed the deletion proposal tag and provided no reason.
Almost all important and reliable information in this article is at the end of the Luke Cage article, so no merging really take place. I really think this article should be deleted so in the interests of fairness and obeying the Wikipedia deletion policy I'm proposing it for deletion in this manner. Planewalker Dave (talk) 10:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete since it has not begun filming and is not guaranteed to. I've added more information to the "Film" section of Luke Cage, though... there are similar extensive sections at Wonder Woman (film), Spider-Man 4, Justice League (film), etc. No problem with recreation if filming ever begins on this. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - It seems that the amount of time the movie has spent in development hell is giving it more notability than some movies that have been released. Whether the movie is ever released may be irrelevant. - House of Scandal (talk) 14:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect. Erik has already merged the content of this article into Luke Cage, and that seems perfectly acceptable to me. Consequently this article should be turned into a redirect in order to preserve the page history. PC78 (talk) 15:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)