Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K2GXT: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*'''Keep''' I think the article just needs to be cleaned up and notability needs to be established. Give it a bit of time. --[[User:Danlev|<font color="#339966">'''Dan Leveille'''</font>]][[User talk:Danlev|<sup><font color="#77BB99">'''TALK'''</font></sup>]] 18:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' I think the article just needs to be cleaned up and notability needs to be established. Give it a bit of time. --[[User:Danlev|<font color="#339966">'''Dan Leveille'''</font>]][[User talk:Danlev|<sup><font color="#77BB99">'''TALK'''</font></sup>]] 18:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''keep''' working on adding 3rd party sources to the wiki. Many are from QST, other magazines, and newspapers. [[User:KB1LQC|KB1LQC]] ([[User talk:KB1LQC|talk]]) 19:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
*'''keep''' working on adding 3rd party sources to the wiki. Many are from QST, other magazines, and newspapers. [[User:KB1LQC|KB1LQC]] ([[User talk:KB1LQC|talk]]) 19:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''keep''' Please feel free to correct mistakes in the wikitext. I will honestly say that I do not feel comfortable with the syntax, but we all have to start somewhere. The biggest roadblock here is time. I am conversing with the ARRL on their QST Magazine articles, and other people/organizations/publishers about their information related to K2GXT. I honestly do agree that it is a bit concerning when one person has much of the info, I wish it would differ. However that is the case, I plan on finding a way to cite much of the information and host as much as possible when I find the means to do so. Many of the documents I have might be put into the RIT Archives in September. This would provide a very secure and long-term solution to publishing the documents containing the information. I encourage anyone who wants to help save this wiki to edit it. Related to K2GXT or not, please! K2GXt is one of those unique clubs with a diverse history. RIT has a huge engineering community, as well as a huge Photography, publishing, and image related community too. This reflects in the clubs history as I have been trying to show. There are events that K2GXT has been involved with, papers published in, etc that I haven't had the chance to take information for the wiki from. Any questions or comments please let me know. As you can see, I want to resolve this matter in a mature way by fixing the problem. I have no intentions of starting an "edit war" or whatever it is referenced to. Just simply getting the information on the wiki will be incredibly important to proving its notability. [[User:KB1LQC|KB1LQC]] ([[User talk:KB1LQC|talk]]) 21:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:25, 15 July 2008
- K2GXT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disputed PROD for a student-run amateur radio club at Rochester Institute of Technology. This club fails WP:ORG for lack of 3rd-party WP:RS coverage. The article is written by the club historian, hence a WP:COI problem. • Gene93k (talk) 11:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as nn. Fails WP:ORG.--Sting Buzz Me... 11:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to RIT for reasons specified by Gene93k. CRGreathouse (t | c) 12:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. A non-notable student club with no coverage by independent reliable sources. Fails WP:ORG and WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Nowhere near notable. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Only external sources are a note that they're comms for a diabetes run and a press release. That doesn't make them notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see how this is notable at all, zap it. MrMarkTaylor What's that?/What I Do/Feed My Box 17:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I think the article just needs to be cleaned up and notability needs to be established. Give it a bit of time. --Dan LeveilleTALK 18:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- keep working on adding 3rd party sources to the wiki. Many are from QST, other magazines, and newspapers. KB1LQC (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- keep Please feel free to correct mistakes in the wikitext. I will honestly say that I do not feel comfortable with the syntax, but we all have to start somewhere. The biggest roadblock here is time. I am conversing with the ARRL on their QST Magazine articles, and other people/organizations/publishers about their information related to K2GXT. I honestly do agree that it is a bit concerning when one person has much of the info, I wish it would differ. However that is the case, I plan on finding a way to cite much of the information and host as much as possible when I find the means to do so. Many of the documents I have might be put into the RIT Archives in September. This would provide a very secure and long-term solution to publishing the documents containing the information. I encourage anyone who wants to help save this wiki to edit it. Related to K2GXT or not, please! K2GXt is one of those unique clubs with a diverse history. RIT has a huge engineering community, as well as a huge Photography, publishing, and image related community too. This reflects in the clubs history as I have been trying to show. There are events that K2GXT has been involved with, papers published in, etc that I haven't had the chance to take information for the wiki from. Any questions or comments please let me know. As you can see, I want to resolve this matter in a mature way by fixing the problem. I have no intentions of starting an "edit war" or whatever it is referenced to. Just simply getting the information on the wiki will be incredibly important to proving its notability. KB1LQC (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)