Jump to content

Talk:Anywhere I Lay My Head: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
== Rating information wrong ==
== Rating information wrong ==
The critical ratings on this are way off. It got a lukewarm review yet every review in the infobox is like 5 starts or 9+/10. Entertainment Weekly gave this a C if you click on the link yet someone put it as A-!!! I don't have time to check/fix all these, someone please correct the complete lies on this entry! --[[Special:Contributions/208.38.59.163|208.38.59.163]] ([[User talk:208.38.59.163|talk]]) 17:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
The critical ratings on this are way off. It got a lukewarm review yet every review in the infobox is like 5 starts or 9+/10. Entertainment Weekly gave this a C if you click on the link yet someone put it as A-!!! I don't have time to check/fix all these, someone please correct the complete lies on this entry! --[[Special:Contributions/208.38.59.163|208.38.59.163]] ([[User talk:208.38.59.163|talk]]) 17:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

The only one I found that was incorrect was "The Guardian" review, and fixed it. Perhaps someone beat me to it. Weird though.

Revision as of 02:03, 17 July 2008

WikiProject iconAlbums Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

can someone find out if it was tom waits or his record company who gave the permission for this, as there is nothing on here past 1985? and also his opinion on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.217.99 (talk) 19:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rating information wrong

The critical ratings on this are way off. It got a lukewarm review yet every review in the infobox is like 5 starts or 9+/10. Entertainment Weekly gave this a C if you click on the link yet someone put it as A-!!! I don't have time to check/fix all these, someone please correct the complete lies on this entry! --208.38.59.163 (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only one I found that was incorrect was "The Guardian" review, and fixed it. Perhaps someone beat me to it. Weird though.