User talk:Mr0t1633: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Adrenergic storm: congrats; comment |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Thanks! I'm glad to know someone already found my article. If it really were to make it on the front page DYK section I would be quite flattered. Your edits are much appreciated; while I may be able to write well, I'm not good with formatting, etc. Again, thanks for the compliment and the nomination! [[User:Mr0t1633|Mr0t1633]] ([[User talk:Mr0t1633#top|talk]]) 17:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks! I'm glad to know someone already found my article. If it really were to make it on the front page DYK section I would be quite flattered. Your edits are much appreciated; while I may be able to write well, I'm not good with formatting, etc. Again, thanks for the compliment and the nomination! [[User:Mr0t1633|Mr0t1633]] ([[User talk:Mr0t1633#top|talk]]) 17:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
: Congratulations on the new article! It looks good. Unfortunately, I have concerns about whether the Taser mention is accurate, so I started a discussion at [[Talk:Adrenergic storm#Taser]]. [[User:Flatscan|Flatscan]] ([[User talk:Flatscan|talk]]) 03:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:27, 19 July 2008
Please feel free to give me advice on my edits below.Mr0t1633 (talk) 01:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Medieval Bulgarian army
Hi! What exactly do you mean with "vague" so that I can fix it? --Gligan (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Aha; thanks, I will fix it ;-) Best, --Gligan (talk) 22:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Adrenergic storm
Hi - interesting article! I have nominated a fact from it for the Did You Know? section of the front page (see here for the nomination). Hopefully the article will thereby get some main-page exposure. I have done a small copyedit to put full stops before the reference markers. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 11:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! I'm glad to know someone already found my article. If it really were to make it on the front page DYK section I would be quite flattered. Your edits are much appreciated; while I may be able to write well, I'm not good with formatting, etc. Again, thanks for the compliment and the nomination! Mr0t1633 (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations on the new article! It looks good. Unfortunately, I have concerns about whether the Taser mention is accurate, so I started a discussion at Talk:Adrenergic storm#Taser. Flatscan (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)