Jump to content

Talk:The Erotic Network: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


There should not be a disclaimer warning about adult content because [[Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles|every article has them at the bottom]]. However, I would like to ask if anyone disagrees.--[[User:Ainlina|Ainlina]] ([[User talk:Ainlina|talk]]) 11:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
There should not be a disclaimer warning about adult content because [[Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles|every article has them at the bottom]]. However, I would like to ask if anyone disagrees.--[[User:Ainlina|Ainlina]] ([[User talk:Ainlina|talk]]) 11:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
:No, of course there shouldn't be a specific warning. It's an encyclopedia, you have to expect such material here. It's the same case as [[WP:SPOILER]]. '''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]]#[[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #1F3F53">Why</span>]]''' 11:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:09, 21 July 2008

Channels

How does a list of channel names add anything to the article? How are they notable by themselves? Just seems spammy to me. Leuko 00:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The network is a collection of PPV channels. Much like there are lists for XM channels, it's informative. It's sometimes hard to seperate spammy from informative, but having a list is hardly promotion..

Disclaimer

Template:RFCsoc

There should not be a disclaimer warning about adult content because every article has them at the bottom. However, I would like to ask if anyone disagrees.--Ainlina (talk) 11:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, of course there shouldn't be a specific warning. It's an encyclopedia, you have to expect such material here. It's the same case as WP:SPOILER. So#Why 11:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]