Talk:NoScript: Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
As I tried to go to this article I forgot the fact the NoScript lacks a space between No and Script and wound up at the search function instead. Therefore I believe we should add a redirect from "No Script" to "NoScript." [[User:Rengaw01|Rengaw01]] ([[User talk:Rengaw01|talk]]) 15:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
As I tried to go to this article I forgot the fact the NoScript lacks a space between No and Script and wound up at the search function instead. Therefore I believe we should add a redirect from "No Script" to "NoScript." [[User:Rengaw01|Rengaw01]] ([[User talk:Rengaw01|talk]]) 15:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Also to note, when the firefox 3 website was just released... this script was not found when searching for '''NoScript''' (Without spaces) and could not be found unless using Google search. This was since fixed. [[Special:Contributions/66.168.19.135|66.168.19.135]] ([[User talk:66.168.19.135|talk]]) 13:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC) |
:Also to note, when the firefox 3 website was just released... this script was not found when searching for '''NoScript''' (Without spaces) on the mozilla add-ons site and could not be found unless using Google search or by using the word '''Script'''. This was since fixed. [[Special:Contributions/66.168.19.135|66.168.19.135]] ([[User talk:66.168.19.135|talk]]) 13:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
== in-text references == |
== in-text references == |
||
Revision as of 13:32, 22 July 2008
Compatibility with other Mozilla browsers
I know for a fact that Camino does not support add-ons, unlike Firefox and SeaMonkey. It does support plug-ins but not add-ons. As a result, Camino doesn't support the NoScript extension. Other than that, just about all the Mozilla browsers I've used support it. It may be important to mention this in the article. Mandanthe1 (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
NoScript could use a redirect.
As I tried to go to this article I forgot the fact the NoScript lacks a space between No and Script and wound up at the search function instead. Therefore I believe we should add a redirect from "No Script" to "NoScript." Rengaw01 (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also to note, when the firefox 3 website was just released... this script was not found when searching for NoScript (Without spaces) on the mozilla add-ons site and could not be found unless using Google search or by using the word Script. This was since fixed. 66.168.19.135 (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
in-text references
I don't think this article can have "in-text" references. Plus, the in-text wikipedia link in that template redirect to a non-existent section within the citing sources page, and searching for in-t (or in-text) results in no matches on that page. 66.168.19.135 (talk) 13:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)