User talk:Seresin/Archive 13: Difference between revisions
Valhalla08 (talk | contribs) →PUMA sourced or unsourced references: new section |
Valhalla08 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== PUMA sourced or unsourced references == |
== PUMA sourced or unsourced references == |
||
== PUMA criticism == |
|||
I removed the paragraph beginning "Another PUMA related blog, Democrats for McCain was also exposed for Republican links" from the Wiki page (you had put it back in after I had removed it earlier). Although the reference '''does''' go to an article raising suspicions about whether the group includes any real Democrats, democrats4mccain.com is not a PUMA site, and does not even seem to be part of the Just Say No Deal coalition. Also, the article does not tie democrats4mccain.com to PUMA or JSND or mention them. Democrats4McCain seems to be a straight-up pro-McCain site, rather than a protest site. I probably should have been clearer on why I removed the paragraph the first time around. [[User:Valhalla08|Valhalla08]] ([[User talk:Valhalla08|talk]]) 22:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC) |
I removed the paragraph beginning "Another PUMA related blog, Democrats for McCain was also exposed for Republican links" from the Wiki page (you had put it back in after I had removed it earlier). Although the reference '''does''' go to an article raising suspicions about whether the group includes any real Democrats, democrats4mccain.com is not a PUMA site, and does not even seem to be part of the Just Say No Deal coalition. Also, the article does not tie democrats4mccain.com to PUMA or JSND or mention them. Democrats4McCain seems to be a straight-up pro-McCain site, rather than a protest site. I probably should have been clearer on why I removed the paragraph the first time around. [[User:Valhalla08|Valhalla08]] ([[User talk:Valhalla08|talk]]) 22:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:49, 2 August 2008
seresin's talk page |
|
Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to ask me for something you need an administrator to do, or something that doesn't require the flag; whichever. Where I reply depends on how I'm feeling. Sorry, but I'm inconsistent. I will reply though, and if you ask me to reply somewhere specific I'll do that.
|
 Archives |
PUMA sourced or unsourced references
I removed the paragraph beginning "Another PUMA related blog, Democrats for McCain was also exposed for Republican links" from the Wiki page (you had put it back in after I had removed it earlier). Although the reference does go to an article raising suspicions about whether the group includes any real Democrats, democrats4mccain.com is not a PUMA site, and does not even seem to be part of the Just Say No Deal coalition. Also, the article does not tie democrats4mccain.com to PUMA or JSND or mention them. Democrats4McCain seems to be a straight-up pro-McCain site, rather than a protest site. I probably should have been clearer on why I removed the paragraph the first time around. Valhalla08 (talk) 22:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)