Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Julie Dancer: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:43, 3 August 2008

Julie Dancer

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 09:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Julie Dancer (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Ἀριστοτέλης (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Adaptron (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Kadiddlehopper (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Mimus polyglottos (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
71.100.1.18 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Code letter:F

Supporting evidence: User:Julie Dancer engaged in sockpuppetry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimal classification, voting/commenting also as User:Adaptron here, as User:71.100.167.93 here, and admits to it here. Since then Julie was blocked for harrassment, and I reblocked when the harrassment continued.

The other accounts listed are obvious, based on their contributions. I'm hoping to see if a rangeblock on 71.100.0.0/16 would be effective, and if there are any other sleeper accounts hiding down there.

- Kevin (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed - all of the above accounts - Alison ^❤ 09:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. the rangeblock; a quick sweep shows no apparent sleeper accounts. However, due to the activity and number of editors on this range, as well as the level of abuse here, I do not recommend a rangeblock at this time. There will be far too much collateral damage - Alison ^❤ 09:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:43, 3 August 2008 edit Alison (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators 47,255 edits →Julie Dancer: detail ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:43, 3 August 2008 edit undo Alison (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators 47,255 edits m →Julie Dancer: ' Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:

	: {{confirmed}} - all of the above accounts - [[User:Alison\|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison\|❤]]</sup> 09:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)		: {{confirmed}} - all of the above accounts - [[User:Alison\|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison\|❤]]</sup> 09:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
	:: Re. the rangeblock; a quick sweep shows no apparent sleeper accounts. However, due to the activity and number of editors on this range, as well as the level of abuse here, I do '''not'' recommend a rangeblock at this time. There will be ''far'' too much collateral damage - [[User:Alison\|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison\|❤]]</sup> 09:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)		:: Re. the rangeblock; a quick sweep shows no apparent sleeper accounts. However, due to the activity and number of editors on this range, as well as the level of abuse here, I do '''not''' recommend a rangeblock at this time. There will be ''far'' too much collateral damage - [[User:Alison\|<span style="color:#FF823D;font-family:Monotype Corsiva">'''A<font color="#FF7C0A">l<font color="#FFB550">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Alison\|❤]]</sup> 09:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)