Talk:IOS version history: Difference between revisions
KelleyCook (talk | contribs) →2.1 Beta Version Release Date: answer |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The 2.1 developer beta was already released. The section labeled as 2.1 is in blue as it is only a developer beta at the moment. Once a final/public release is, well, released, the article will be edited to reflect the official release date. As I've stated numerous times before, it is very ambiguous to state that the beta is to be released in the "future" or "late 2008" when it has clearly been released. [[Special:Contributions/70.119.183.138|70.119.183.138]] ([[User talk:70.119.183.138|talk]]) 19:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC) |
The 2.1 developer beta was already released. The section labeled as 2.1 is in blue as it is only a developer beta at the moment. Once a final/public release is, well, released, the article will be edited to reflect the official release date. As I've stated numerous times before, it is very ambiguous to state that the beta is to be released in the "future" or "late 2008" when it has clearly been released. [[Special:Contributions/70.119.183.138|70.119.183.138]] ([[User talk:70.119.183.138|talk]]) 19:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
:This really isn't very hard, release means publicly released not a limited beta offered to developers that will likely changed numerous times before it is released. Your fairly new, so please look at the history and see how this was handled for the (numerous) 2.0β releases. Don't put a date until you have a firm public release date. -- [[User:KelleyCook|KelleyCook]] ([[User talk:KelleyCook|talk]]) 20:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:49, 5 August 2008
User modifications
No mention of which versions have available user modifications? Ie: where can I install user created software, and where can't I? TimRiker (talk) 17:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- WP:Be bold and add it yourself, but make sure it is reliably sourced. -- 18:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Listing beta versions?
What has been the policy with listing beta releases in this article? There have been a number of reports in the online media about a 2.0.1 version being tested just a few days after 2.0 hit the street. There is also reporting going on now about a 2.1 release going out to developers.[1][2][3]. 2.0.1 may not warrant listing as there hasn't been any confirmation from Apple on it, but being that 2.1 has been given to developers it looks like a real candidate for listing here. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Please stop editing out the 2.1 beta release date. The "July 24, 2008" date was the day the beta was released, which is what that portion of the table (see the key) represents. Once the final version is released, the article will be edited (pretty color change and release date).
- Currently, the "future" portion of the article comes across very ambiguous: stating the beta version will be released in the "future."
- I do, however, appreciate the combining of the duplicate references 70.119.180.155 (talk) 08:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
iPod touch upgrade charges
I added the specific US amounts to the pervious bullets. If anyone can find a better reference for the 2.0 upgrade, it would be a welcome change. Descender27 (talk) 17:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the addition, but this information (with is US-centric anyhow) is not supposed to be part of Wikipedia per WP:NOPRICES. I've reverted it. -- KelleyCook (talk) 17:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
2.1 Beta Version Release Date
The 2.1 developer beta was already released. The section labeled as 2.1 is in blue as it is only a developer beta at the moment. Once a final/public release is, well, released, the article will be edited to reflect the official release date. As I've stated numerous times before, it is very ambiguous to state that the beta is to be released in the "future" or "late 2008" when it has clearly been released. 70.119.183.138 (talk) 19:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- This really isn't very hard, release means publicly released not a limited beta offered to developers that will likely changed numerous times before it is released. Your fairly new, so please look at the history and see how this was handled for the (numerous) 2.0β releases. Don't put a date until you have a firm public release date. -- KelleyCook (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)