Talk:Vitória F.C.: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:43, 11 August 2008

Football Start‑class

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Kit colours and pattern

These current home colours have been the colours of Vitória in all its life, with this very pattern, and though some stylish variations may appear from time to time, this is the official kit. The only variable kit is the away kit, which features purple and white colours this year, based in the city's colours. --Richard George 21:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Names and conventions

Sporting C.P. and Milošević are the correct Wikipedia spellings. --Richard George 21:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting CP is meaningless to people outside Portugal. Use Sporting, Sporting Lisbon, Sporting Clube de Portugal is better.

Milošević is the Serbian surname correct spelling, bur per the club official website, and the squad list of inter-national event, it links to Milojević instead of s.Matthew_hk t c 04:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sporting is not a club or team founded by people far away outside of Portugal, «Sporting CP» follows the european convention for the sake of naming teams. Don't spend much time editing articles which you know little more than nothing. I've lived all my life near these two teams, no matter how hard you dedicate your life to Wikipedia you won't know more about them than people who are inside the clubs. Cheers. --Richard George 22:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal transfers

I propose to keep the yearly informations mentioning which team the player came from. It is elucidative for the visitors. If the player remains more than one season in Vitória, information will be removed. Wikipedians agree? --Richard George 21:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The new squad list by winter transfer is per official site. Matthew_hk t c 04:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sport season date format

Hey Mareklug, what you are doing with the dates and figures is converting them to an absolutely weird way of spelling sports seasons. I've never seen that in my all life, and I think you'd better start correcting hundreds of teams around Wikipedia. Thousands of teams if you count other sports. Good luck :\ Richard George.ć

Richard, I changed "1975/6" to 1975-1976 (by way of an example) to enable wikification of the dates. Do you really think this is unreasonable? If so, I'll change them back, but I'd like to see the links on dates preserved. How do you suggest it be done? -- Mareklug ^talk 05:04, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok. I changed them to this format: 1975/76. Hope this is acceptable. -- Mareklug ^talk 05:20, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VitoriaFC logo.PNG

Image:VitoriaFC logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:VitoriaFC logo.gif

Image:VitoriaFC logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JJ Fiorentina.jpg

Image:JJ Fiorentina.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major page degrade from May 9th through July (2008)

I'm shocked to see how since edition by 92.3.181.88 (Talk) at 13:43, 9 May 2008 one of the best Wikipedia football club pages has gone down, down, down the drain. User 92.3.181.88 and user Pararubbas have made bad taste changes to the page. The History and News section has gone inferior, totally vandalized with no remorse. It looks vulgar now.

Me and some other careful editors have made this a pleasant page and we are not going to tolerate this bad taste editions, and we are to going to close watch this page and if bad taste persist, we are to submit this page to admnistrators for appreciation since this has become an utter crap, and bad taste seems to be frequent. --Richard George (talk) 00:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since these users don't even care to have talk pages or engage in debates, the History and News setionc of the main article will be recovered imediately.

--Richard George (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed or trimmed several POV statements that appeared to overtly praise the club, such as the "remarkable" "golden age" seasons and "european shock". There are still several statements in the text that I tagged as requiring citations, such as the Euro 2004 stadium attribution and the shaky financial situation. --Pc13 (talk) 17:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Praising like you did in Buraka Som Sistema? Many international Wikipedians have made their contributions and no one has made complaints about the page except you and some other two. All Portuguese, of course, and most supectedly rosen from club rivalry grudges. You just went here and changed as you found it pleased your will. You forget that what you see as POV, may be be regarded as POV itself.

The page has relevant information only. If you are allergic to facts, there are many countries around the world where journalism freedom is as you seem to like.

First discuss, then commit to agreements with other people, then, and only then, things are to be changed. That's what the book says.--Richard George (talk) 04:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weel, I've let the positive minor changes you've made, not the big personal ones. From now on, please be kind to first make your drastic suggestions here.--Richard George (talk) 05:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 I've removed or trimmed several POV statements that appeared to overtly praise the club, such as the "remarkable" "golden age" seasons and "european shock". There are still several statements in the text that I tagged as requiring citations, such as the Euro 2004 stadium attribution and the shaky financial situation. --[[User:Pc13|Pc13]] ([[User talk:Pc13|talk]]) 17:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
-:Praising like you did in Buraka Som Sistema? No one has complaint abount it except you and other two. Many international Wikipedians have made their contributions and only 2 or 3 people have made complaints about the page. All Portuguese, of course. You just went here and changed as you found it pleased your eyes. You forget that what you see as POV, may be be regarded as POV itself.
+:Praising like you did in Buraka Som Sistema? Many international Wikipedians have made their contributions and no one has made complaints about the page except you and some other two. All Portuguese, of course, and most supectedly rosen from club rivalry grudges. You just went here and changed as you found it pleased your will. You forget that what you see as POV, may be be regarded as POV itself.
-The page has relevant information only. If you are allergic to facts, there are many countries around the world where journalism freedom is as you seem to like.
+:The page has relevant information only. If you are allergic to facts, there are many countries around the world where journalism freedom is as you seem to like.
-First discuss, then commit to agreements with other people, then, and only then, things are to be changed. That's what the book says.--[[User:Richard George|Richard George]] ([[User talk:Richard George|talk]]) 04:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
+:First discuss, then commit to agreements with other people, then, and only then, things are to be changed. That's what the book says.--[[User:Richard George|Richard George]] ([[User talk:Richard George|talk]]) 04:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
+::Weel, I've let the positive minor changes you've made, not the big personal ones. From now on, please be kind to first make your drastic suggestions here.--[[User:Richard George|Richard George]] ([[User talk:Richard George|talk]]) 05:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)