Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ssi-Ruuk: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Ssi-Ruuk: fix (preview would be good eh? |
comment |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' No [[WP:RS|reliable and independent sources]] to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. Totally in-universe. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 02:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' No [[WP:RS|reliable and independent sources]] to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. Totally in-universe. [[User:Edison|Edison]] ([[User talk:Edison|talk]]) 02:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak keep''' ''University of Sanbra Guide to Intelligent Life: The Chiss'' is a clearly secondary source that has significant coverage and is largely independent. Throw in secondary books like '''Star Wars: The Essential Guide to Characters''' and '''Ultimate Alien Anthology: Star Wars Roleplaying Game''' (The second of which I'd argue is also fairly independent) and you've got some reasonable sources. Plus 12,000+ ghits which are a (weak) indication of notability. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 15:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep''' ''University of Sanbra Guide to Intelligent Life: The Chiss'' is a clearly secondary source that has significant coverage and is largely independent. Throw in secondary books like '''Star Wars: The Essential Guide to Characters''' and '''Ultimate Alien Anthology: Star Wars Roleplaying Game''' (The second of which I'd argue is also fairly independent) and you've got some reasonable sources. Plus 12,000+ ghits which are a (weak) indication of notability. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 15:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
:You have established nothing by listing book titles, as you have no idea what's in them, if they have a lot of information or none of the type needed to establish notability. Also, you are now attempting to copy Le Grand Roi's tactic of using pointless Google hits as an indication of notability, so please stop. [[User:Judgesurreal777|Judgesurreal777]] ([[User talk:Judgesurreal777|talk]]) 17:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:24, 11 August 2008
- Ssi-Ruuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is simply a repetition of various plot points from the the Star Wars media articles plot sections, and is therefore totally duplicative and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to The Truce at Bakura- Umbralcorax (talk) 01:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No reliable and independent sources to establish notability. Totally in-universe. Edison (talk) 02:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep University of Sanbra Guide to Intelligent Life: The Chiss is a clearly secondary source that has significant coverage and is largely independent. Throw in secondary books like Star Wars: The Essential Guide to Characters and Ultimate Alien Anthology: Star Wars Roleplaying Game (The second of which I'd argue is also fairly independent) and you've got some reasonable sources. Plus 12,000+ ghits which are a (weak) indication of notability. Hobit (talk) 15:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- You have established nothing by listing book titles, as you have no idea what's in them, if they have a lot of information or none of the type needed to establish notability. Also, you are now attempting to copy Le Grand Roi's tactic of using pointless Google hits as an indication of notability, so please stop. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)