Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele LeBlanc: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:42, 12 August 2008

Michele LeBlanc

violation of WP:COI, as only author matches the subject of the article, likely does not meet WP:N KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 18:42, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Although I dislike vanity articles as much as the next one, WP:COI is not a reason to delete. "Likely does not meet WP:N" is not really a good deletion reason either. The nom should specify why the subject of this article is not notable. If that can be done, I'll happily vote delete, until then I vote keep, because invalid nomination. --Crusio (talk) 14:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. When working biographies of living persons one has to be extremely diligent in providing reliable sources that pass all aspects of WP:V... and every sentence be sourced. More importantly there should be a declared WP:COI if writing about something with which you have a vested interest. All those concerns aside, the biggest problem here is the violation of Wikipedia:Autobiography since there is no apparent approval by other editors. As presented, the article has no sources and does not declare nor prove notability. Nothing in the article is suported. An IMDB seacrh shows her as having worked as an associate producer on one project.[1] Her article about herself reads almost like a job resume. This one is really no contest.'Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I just left Michele a note instructing her where and how to save this article, as though it is unlikley to survive this AfD, it would be at home at her User:Michele leblanc User Page. No need to push her away. (Sure hope to see that red link turn blue) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She seems to be so notable that even her firing merits an entire newspaper article. -- Hoary (talk) 07:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Delete'''. When working [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] one has to be extremely diligent in providing [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that pass all aspects of [[WP:V]]... and every sentence be sourced. More importantly there should be a declared [[WP:COI]] if writing about something with which you have a vested interest. All those concerns aside, the biggest problem here is the violation of [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]] since there is no apparent approval by other editors. As presented, the article has no sources and does not declare nor prove notability. Nothing in the article is suported. An IMDB seacrh shows her as having worked as an associate producer on one project.[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2853064/] Her article about herself reads almost like a job resume. This one is really no contest.''''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]] 03:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 ::And I just left Michele a [[User talk:Michele leblanc|note]] instructing her where and how to save this article, as though it is unlikley to survive this AfD, it would be at home at her [[User:Michele leblanc]] User Page. No need to push her away. (Sure hope to see that red link turn blue)  '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 06:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' She seems to be so notable that even [http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/1999/Nov-19-Fri-1999/news/12388587.html her firing] merits an entire newspaper article. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 07:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)