Talk:Pat Roberts: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:12, 15 August 2008

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

Biography B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Kansas Unassessed

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The bit about the committeework

It appears to be a LONG quote from his office or something, and then a very long quote from a newspaper?! The first seems too much to be really neutral and the second too much to be fair use. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article so biased against Roberts it isn't even funny. If Roberts were a Democrat, I can assure you that people would be all over this page, making sure it was "ubiased." Wikipedia is a joke when it comes to liberals and conservatives. I'm a liberal myself, but wikipedia is so biased against conservatives it's insane. Burroughsks88 (talk)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 It appears to be a LONG quote from his office or something, and then a very long quote from a newspaper?! The first seems too much to be really neutral and the second too much to be fair use. [[Special:Contributions/68.39.174.238|68.39.174.238]] ([[User talk:68.39.174.238|talk]]) 00:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
+This article so biased against Roberts it isn't even funny.  If Roberts were a Democrat, I can assure you that people would be all over this page, making sure it was "ubiased."  Wikipedia is a joke when it comes to liberals and conservatives.  I'm a liberal myself, but wikipedia is so biased against conservatives it's insane.
+[[User:Burroughsks88|Burroughsks88]] ([[User talk:Burroughsks88|talk]])