Talk:Fixed-point combinator: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Dumbing Down= |
|||
Could you dumb it down a shade? |
Could you dumb it down a shade? |
||
--[[User:Mike Schiraldi|Mike Schiraldi]] 01:53, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
--[[User:Mike Schiraldi|Mike Schiraldi]] 01:53, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
||
*I think the first paragraoh is misleading the reader into thinking about fixpoints as real values, whereas the following paragraph is talking about a fixpoint in function space. It takes a bit of a conceptual leap to understand the latter, and the first paragraph doesn't particularly help... |
|||
Revision as of 00:17, 15 September 2005
Dumbing Down
Could you dumb it down a shade? --Mike Schiraldi 01:53, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I think the first paragraoh is misleading the reader into thinking about fixpoints as real values, whereas the following paragraph is talking about a fixpoint in function space. It takes a bit of a conceptual leap to understand the latter, and the first paragraph doesn't particularly help...
I suspect that some of that stuff is graffiti, but I'm not expert enough to say for sure. Will someone please check on it?