Talk:Samsung M800 Instinct: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:43, 19 August 2008

This page needs to be about the Samsung Instinct, not the iPhone and the Samsung Instinct. --67.10.154.127 (talk) 12:28, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality on this paged has been completely smeared by iPhone users. I've taken out facts that are either completely untrue, unsupported, or taken out of context.

this page is all about the iphone someone needs to make it more about the instinct and add more photos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.0.52 (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Instinct will be offered in Canada by Telus Mobility as well, it's on their list of phones as "Coming Soon". 99.246.75.2 (talk) 19:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can the stealth iphone lovers stop? There's no need to give us the release date and price of the iPhone in the first two sentences of the Instinct's release paragraph. It's not about the iPhone. iPhone's release date and price shouldn't be in that paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.225.104 (talk) 02:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Instinct Video

Is the Instinct able to play Adobe Flash video? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.139.37.2 (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. 75.43.199.114 (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Two 1,000mAh Li-ion batteries, each capable of 5.75 continuous talk time." What is 5.75? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.106.9.8 (talk) 09:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Five and three quarters is obviously less then six hours of continuous talk time.142.104.2.100 (talk) 23:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addresses and Calendar

Would someone with a Samsung Instinct please add comments on the address book, and calendar features. Compatibility with Microsoft Outlook is of significant interest to many. smrack: 142.104.2.100 (talk) 23:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No pics?

Why are there no pics of the phone on the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.136.199 (talk) 23:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

iPod?

Why is this page in the iPod category? This is not an iPod, it doesn't communicate with iPods, it isn't made by Apple, it has absolutely nothing to do with the iPod. It may be a competitor to the iPhone/iPod touch, but that doesn't warrant putting it in the same category. --mikeaitch (talk) 03:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to iPhone section

I feel as though the version of the comparison to the iPhone in paragraph form should be removed entirely and replaced by the table. It shows equally and without bias the features of the phones and compares them, after all, different people will rate different features as more or less important, let them decide. Thoughts?

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 Why is this page in the iPod category? This is not an iPod, it doesn't communicate with iPods, it isn't made by Apple, it has absolutely nothing to do with the iPod. It may be a competitor to the iPhone/iPod touch, but that doesn't warrant putting it in the same category. --[[User:Mikeaitch|mikeaitch]] ([[User talk:Mikeaitch|talk]]) 03:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
+== Comparison to iPhone section ==
+I feel as though the version of the comparison to the iPhone in paragraph form should be removed entirely and replaced by the table.  It shows equally and without bias the features of the phones and compares them, after all, different people will rate different features as more or less important, let them decide.  Thoughts?