Talk:Spanair Flight 5022: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Jicosa - "→166 (164 plus two babies), not 164 passengers: new section" |
|||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
== 166 (164 plus two babies), not 164 passengers == |
== 166 (164 plus two babies), not 164 passengers == |
||
There were 166 passengers, not 164, according to spanish media. <ref>[http://elmundo.es/], [http://www.elpais.com]. The airplane had 15 years old (nine of them operating with Spanair). ~~~~ |
There were 166 passengers, not 164, according to spanish media. <ref>[http://elmundo.es/], [http://www.elpais.com]. The airplane had 15 years old (nine of them operating with Spanair). (~~~~) |
||
== 166 (164 plus two babies), not 164 passengers == |
|||
There were 166 passengers, not 164, according to spanish media. <ref>[http://elmundo.es/], [http://www.elpais.com]. The airplane had 15 years old (nine of them operating with Spanair). ~~~~ |
|||
== 166 (164 plus two babies), not 164 passengers == |
|||
There were 166 passengers, not 164, according to spanish media. <ref>[http://elmundo.es/], [http://www.elpais.com]. |
|||
The airplane had 15 years old (nine of them operating with Spanair). ~~~~ {{subst:Unsigned|1=Jicosa|2=17:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)}} <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Revision as of 17:43, 20 August 2008
 | Disaster management Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Aviation: Accidents Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 August 2008. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
WARNING, Times online is WRONG!!
They have misunderstood the death toll number! it is only 45 confirmed by now, watching it live on Spanish TV...David (talk) 15:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Fix history
Can an admin fix the history? We have two occurrences of this article. This article was redirected to Spanair Flight 22 after an edit history had been established. I don't care where the article lives, but we have two histories now. --Elliskev 15:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The admon neds to fix the page to be on Spanair Flight 22 to be inline with other articles eg United airlines flight 93 American Airlines Flight 11 and Pan Am Flight 103--Somali123 (talk) 15:32, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
SAS Confirms
SAS has confirmed 166 passengers were on board and that 27 have survived 19 injured. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.163.135 (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
El Mundo
El Mundo are saying at least 140 dead. The Spanish Emergency services are saying 28 survived the crash but one of the survivors died on the way to hospital, there were 164 passengers aboard and nine crew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.25.58 (talk) 16:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Spanair confirms
Spanair confirms 164 passengers and 9 crew were on board —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.147.147 (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Move to Spanair Flight 5022
This article should be moved to Spanair Flight 5022, but only an administrator can do so. – Zntrip 16:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
citation needed
The Regional Authority in Madrid has so far confirmed that more than 100 people have been killed as a result of the crash. In addition, it has also been confirmed that there were 166 passengers - including two babies, and 6 crew members on board.
Can anyone provide the official statement from the Regional Authority or a news article to confirm this?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.116.60 (talk • contribs) 16:29, August 20, 2008 (UTC)
BCC news eyewitness
BBC 24 News report eyewitness account that the plain was airborne pas decision speed, rolled due to a left engine failure. The tail snapped on the ground and set a 1 Km2 patch of a ground a light. This prevented the emergency services to reach the plane for 15 to 20 minutes. reported at 17:42 Scubafish (talk) 16:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
166 (164 plus two babies), not 164 passengers
There were 166 passengers, not 164, according to spanish media. <ref>[1], [2]. The airplane had 15 years old (nine of them operating with Spanair). (~~~~)