Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2005 September 17: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:18, 17 September 2005

September 17

Image:Morraine lake.jpg → Commons RedWolf 01:19, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kelvinside academy os map2.jpg - Copyright notice clearly states "Copyright Crown 2005" It is not a proper copyright in any event. --Noitall 05:28, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not a copyvio. If Noitall had actually read the image description he would see why. See also Wikipedia:Maps from Ordnance Survey. We are well within the ten images limit. What does it is not a proper copyright in any event mean? --

Agree - not a copyvio. OS website clearly states permission for 10 images. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RHaworth 08:58, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M Streep Silkwood.jpg OR, NS, obsoleted by Image:Streep Silkwood.jpg --Bash 02:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:M25.jpeg BI (and NS, though that's a bit redundant; I'm having trouble just submitting the IFD tag to the picture). --Bash 02:20, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MF132.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:27, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MFCroCop.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:37, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ma Ying-Jeou.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MVaughan.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ma12.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:54, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mac mini.jpg OR, NS, obsoleted by Image:MacminiAPPLE.jpg --Bash 02:54, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:TheAge-frontpage.jpg OB by Image:TheAge-frontpage.png Swarve 03:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Channelninelogo.JPG OB by Image:Channelnine.png Swarve 03:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ramdiesel.jpg OR --Smiker 10:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Class Action 020 (cropped for Garageband.com).jpg UE, page is a candidate for deletion. Mikecap 03:24, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MadonnaEvita02.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 04:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Madonna.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 04:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Madonna2012.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 04:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Another big batch of OR (and mostly NS) "Conversion script" images. Coffee 05:38, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:SunsetBoulevardWilliamHolden.jpg - Clearly copyrighted from a well-maintained copyright by the studio. Not a proper fair use or GDFL license. --Noitall 06:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree. I contributed the image and its use is in line with Wikipedia:Fair use and is correctly tagged and justified as per Wikipedia:Image description page. If this image is deleted then rightly all screenshot images should be deleted for the same reason. Of course the copyright is owned by someone - I've made that clear on the image description page. Fair use is acceptable in some cases and this case, I believe, is one of them. Why did the person nominating this for deletion ignore two other screenshot images in the same article? This image was part of the article during the time it went through featured article consideration, and the images were discussed at the time, with consensus being that their use was in fact, fair. What's not fair is this nomination for deletion. Rossrs 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:BluceD.jpg - Clearly copyrighted. Not a proper fair use. --Noitall 06:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photo - fair use. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iron Maiden Steve Harris.jpg - Clearly copyrighted. Not a proper fair use. --Noitall 06:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photo - fair use. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As per my comments above - this is another featured article, and the image was discussed during the nomination process and consensus was reached that its use was fair. Rossrs 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 222: / Line 222: @@
 **[[:Image:Fatherdamienwithlepers.gif]]
 *[[:Image:SunsetBoulevardWilliamHolden.jpg]] - Clearly copyrighted from a well-maintained copyright by the studio.  Not a proper fair use or GDFL license.  --[[User:Noitall|Noitall]] 06:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
+**Disagree.  I contributed the image and its use is in line with [[Wikipedia:Fair use]] and is correctly tagged and justified as per [[Wikipedia:Image description page]].  If this image is deleted then rightly '''all''' screenshot images should be deleted for the same reason.  Of course the copyright is owned by someone - I've made that clear on the image description page.  Fair use is acceptable in some cases and this case, I believe, is one of them.  Why did the person nominating this for deletion ignore two other screenshot images in the same article?  This image was part of the article during the time it went through featured article consideration, and the images were discussed at the time, with consensus being that their use was in fact, fair.  What's not fair is this nomination for deletion. [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 *[[:Image:BluceD.jpg]] - Clearly copyrighted.  Not a proper fair use.  --[[User:Noitall|Noitall]] 06:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 ::Promo photo - fair use. --[[User:PopUpPirate|PopUpPirate]] 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 *[[:Image:Iron Maiden Steve Harris.jpg]] - Clearly copyrighted.  Not a proper fair use.  --[[User:Noitall|Noitall]] 06:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 ::Promo photo - fair use. --[[User:PopUpPirate|PopUpPirate]] 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
+:::As per my comments above - this is another featured article, and the image was discussed during the nomination process and consensus was reached that its use was fair. [[User:Rossrs|Rossrs]] 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)