Talk:Bahram V: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* A note about ''1911 Encyclopedia Britannica'' entries on the [[Sassanid]] kings: I have noticed that most of the entries view the wars between the Persians and Rome/Byzantine as if the root of the conflict was about Christianity or how the Christians were treated in Iran. This is completely false. The Christians in Iran for all practical purposes were a non-entity or non-issue at that time. The conflicts with the Romans goes back to long before the advent of Christianity. They were for a variety of reasons, but religion hardly palyed a role as a contributing factor for these conflicts. I will try to gradually correct the entries, but I can sure use some impartial helping hands here. --[[User:K1|Keyvan ]] 15:41 Apr 11, 2003 (UTC) |
* A note about ''1911 Encyclopedia Britannica'' entries on the [[Sassanid]] kings: I have noticed that most of the entries view the wars between the Persians and Rome/Byzantine as if the root of the conflict was about Christianity or how the Christians were treated in Iran. This is completely false. The Christians in Iran for all practical purposes were a non-entity or non-issue at that time. The conflicts with the Romans goes back to long before the advent of Christianity. They were for a variety of reasons, but religion hardly palyed a role as a contributing factor for these conflicts. I will try to gradually correct the entries, but I can sure use some impartial helping hands here. --[[User:K1|Keyvan ]] 15:41 Apr 11, 2003 (UTC) |
||
: I concur completely. Should verso be changed to reverse? Its pretty archaic. Today I believe the numismatic terms are just obverse and reverse. [[User:Khirad|Khirad]] 23:12, 17 September 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:12, 17 September 2005
- A note about 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica entries on the Sassanid kings: I have noticed that most of the entries view the wars between the Persians and Rome/Byzantine as if the root of the conflict was about Christianity or how the Christians were treated in Iran. This is completely false. The Christians in Iran for all practical purposes were a non-entity or non-issue at that time. The conflicts with the Romans goes back to long before the advent of Christianity. They were for a variety of reasons, but religion hardly palyed a role as a contributing factor for these conflicts. I will try to gradually correct the entries, but I can sure use some impartial helping hands here. --Keyvan 15:41 Apr 11, 2003 (UTC)
- I concur completely. Should verso be changed to reverse? Its pretty archaic. Today I believe the numismatic terms are just obverse and reverse. Khirad 23:12, 17 September 2005 (UTC)