Talk:Welcome to Our Neighborhood: Difference between revisions
Blackngold29 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:::Since it is a video, what about runtime, cast? Also, use [http://www.slipknot-metal.com/main.php?sk=welcome-to-our-neighborhood the official website] to add a bit more. [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 04:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC) |
:::Since it is a video, what about runtime, cast? Also, use [http://www.slipknot-metal.com/main.php?sk=welcome-to-our-neighborhood the official website] to add a bit more. [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 04:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
::::or [http://www.opiumofthepeople.net/ootp/musicmain.php?go=music/disc/dvds/welcometoourneighborhood this] [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 04:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC) |
::::or [http://www.opiumofthepeople.net/ootp/musicmain.php?go=music/disc/dvds/welcometoourneighborhood this] [[User:Nergaal|Nergaal]] ([[User talk:Nergaal|talk]]) 04:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
::::Slipknot-metal and Opium of the People, are not official sites, or [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. It's good info, I'd like to use it, but we need a better source. '''<span style="border: 2px Black solid;background:Black;font-family: Tahoma">[[User:Blackngold29|<font color="#CDB87C">Black</font>]][[User talk:Blackngold29|<font color="#CDB87C">ngold29</font>]]</span>''' 04:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:57, 26 August 2008
Welcome to Our Neighborhood is currently a good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 16:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. This article is not categorized by subtopic. Please edit the |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
To-do list for Welcome to Our Neighborhood: To-do list is empty: remove {{To do}} tag or click on edit to add an item. |
Fair use rationale for Image:Welcometoourneighborhood.jpg
Image:Welcometoourneighborhood.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Just commenting the intro says more than the article itself... and it is not even a B-class article... Nergaal (talk) 04:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Articles do not need to be assessed as B-class before being nominated for GA. We nominated it for GAN because we believe it is as comprehensive as it is going to get. I'll work on the introduction a bit; I'm sure some can be moved to the body. Gary King (talk) 04:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, the article is organized this way because if all of the information in the intro was also again mentioned in the body, then it will be repetitive because of the close proximity of the content. Some of the information, such as the list of music videos, is shown in list format in the body but in prose in the lead, so it isn't a problem. Gary King (talk) 04:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Since it is a video, what about runtime, cast? Also, use the official website to add a bit more. Nergaal (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, the article is organized this way because if all of the information in the intro was also again mentioned in the body, then it will be repetitive because of the close proximity of the content. Some of the information, such as the list of music videos, is shown in list format in the body but in prose in the lead, so it isn't a problem. Gary King (talk) 04:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Slipknot-metal and Opium of the People, are not official sites, or reliable sources. It's good info, I'd like to use it, but we need a better source. Blackngold29 04:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- Good article nominees without a subtopic
- All unassessed articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- C-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- C-Class Heavy Metal articles
- WikiProject Metal articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists, unused