Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2005 September 17: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
*drew (talk | contribs)
September 17: +an image
Line 265: Line 265:
*[[:Image:Emily Browning the Gardener.jpg]] UE, OR, looks like a vandalised image too. [[User:*drew|*drew]] 02:40, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Emily Browning the Gardener.jpg]] UE, OR, looks like a vandalised image too. [[User:*drew|*drew]] 02:40, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Deathwatch movie.png]] OR, [[:Image:Deathwatch film.jpg|OB]]. [[User:*drew|*drew]] 03:25, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
*[[:Image:Deathwatch movie.png]] OR, [[:Image:Deathwatch film.jpg|OB]]. [[User:*drew|*drew]] 03:25, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
*[[:Image:2005_vote_and_seats.JPG]] OR --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] 04:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:49, 18 September 2005

September 17

Not a copyvio. If Noitall had actually read the image description he would see why. See also Wikipedia:Maps from Ordnance Survey. We are well within the ten images limit. What does it is not a proper copyright in any event mean? --
Agree - not a copyvio. OS website clearly states permission for 10 images. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not making a comment on this specific image, but with permission isn't sufficent for our project. Unless you can make a good fair use claim, the image must be free in the free software sense of free. --Gmaxwell 21:10, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RHaworth 08:58, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photo - fair use. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As per my comments above - this is also used in a featured article (Iron Maiden), and the image was discussed during the nomination process and consensus was reached that its use was fair. Rossrs 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Promo photo - fair use. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As per my comments above - this is also used in a featured article (Iron Maiden), and the image was discussed during the nomination process and consensus was reached that its use was fair. Rossrs 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]