Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelique (porn star): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
JoshuaD1991 (talk | contribs) afd |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Angelique (porn star)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Angelique (porn star)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelique (porn star)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelique (porn star)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 27#{{anchorencode:Angelique (porn star)}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Angelique (porn star)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Angelique (porn star)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelique (porn star)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelique (porn star)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 27#{{anchorencode:Angelique (porn star)}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
Doesn't appear to meet [[WP:PORNBIO]]. [[User:JoshuaD1991|JoshuaD1991]] ([[User talk:JoshuaD1991|talk]]) 18:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC) |
Doesn't appear to meet [[WP:PORNBIO]]. [[User:JoshuaD1991|JoshuaD1991]] ([[User talk:JoshuaD1991|talk]]) 18:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
:I disagree with the deletion. If this one is going to be deleted, then there are HUNDREDs of articles on various people of all professions that need to be deleted as they are shorter than this one and have even fewer references. I nominate that this article simply needs more work and time to develop. [[User:Hobbomock|Hobbomock]] ([[User talk:Hobbomock|talk]]) 20:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:23, 27 August 2008
- Angelique (porn star) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree with the deletion. If this one is going to be deleted, then there are HUNDREDs of articles on various people of all professions that need to be deleted as they are shorter than this one and have even fewer references. I nominate that this article simply needs more work and time to develop. Hobbomock (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)