Talk:Collective:Unconscious: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Justindavila - "" |
Justindavila (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:I do not object to adding wikilinks to related articles, I object to the way you were doing it, in massive lists. Notice that I did keep intact the group of notable people that have worked with C:U, I just merely incorporated it into a subsection. [[User:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Glass</font>]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Cobra</font>]]''' 04:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
:I do not object to adding wikilinks to related articles, I object to the way you were doing it, in massive lists. Notice that I did keep intact the group of notable people that have worked with C:U, I just merely incorporated it into a subsection. [[User:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Glass</font>]]'''[[User talk:GlassCobra|<font color="002bb8">Cobra</font>]]''' 04:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
you're the only one (in fact, I think you're the only one who seems to care about this), but my point is that there is an organization that exists in conjunction with a theater space, of which there were more than one. the nonprofit organization deserves an infobox as well as the theaters. recommendations? Regarding notabilty, I hope you took note of the second paragraph: "Collective:Unconscious as an organization has provided notable and demonstrable effects on New York City downtown culture, society, and entertainment...." |
you're the only one (in fact, I think you're the only one who seems to care about this), but my point is that there is an organization that exists in conjunction with a theater space, of which there were more than one. the nonprofit organization deserves an infobox as well as the theaters. recommendations? Regarding notabilty, I hope you took note of the second paragraph: "Collective:Unconscious as an organization has provided notable and demonstrable effects on New York City downtown culture, society, and entertainment...." [[User:Justindavila|Justindavila]] ([[User talk:Justindavila|talk]]) 04:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
also, i cannot find in the Manual of Style where it indicates there cannot be more than one infobox per article. can you point me to that, please? thanks. [[User:Justindavila|Justindavila]] ([[User talk:Justindavila|talk]]) 04:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:44, 28 August 2008
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
please offer suggestions or define what makes this page read like an advert.67.101.248.245 02:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
look, there are two theaters that were involved in the history of Collective:Unconscious. Please leave it. Justindavila (talk) 04:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, quite clearly; however, this does not mean that the article needs another infobox. The article is about the group, not the theater. Each article should only have one infobox. Justin, I'm not nearly as concerned with the COI thing as I am with your blatant disregard of our editorial policies and careless reversions of edits. Wikipedia is not for tongue-in-cheek comments, nor is it for excessive lists and crowded pictures. GlassCobra 04:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
then you suggest a separate article for the theater?Justindavila (talk) 04:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
also, the artists I listed all have wikipedia articles on them. part of the reason they are artists is because the used this theater. are you sure you're qualified to make these editorial decisions? Justindavila (talk) 04:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- I absolutely do not suggest a separate article for the theater; it does not have enough notability to warrant a separate page. What I suggest is that you cease adding the second infobox, as you have been told by myself and several other editors.
- I do not object to adding wikilinks to related articles, I object to the way you were doing it, in massive lists. Notice that I did keep intact the group of notable people that have worked with C:U, I just merely incorporated it into a subsection. GlassCobra 04:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
you're the only one (in fact, I think you're the only one who seems to care about this), but my point is that there is an organization that exists in conjunction with a theater space, of which there were more than one. the nonprofit organization deserves an infobox as well as the theaters. recommendations? Regarding notabilty, I hope you took note of the second paragraph: "Collective:Unconscious as an organization has provided notable and demonstrable effects on New York City downtown culture, society, and entertainment...." Justindavila (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
also, i cannot find in the Manual of Style where it indicates there cannot be more than one infobox per article. can you point me to that, please? thanks. Justindavila (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)