Jump to content

User talk:Turgan/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lkruijsw (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lkruijsw (talk | contribs)
Line 702: Line 702:


22:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
22:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Do, you agree in changing:

766,500 tonnes U3O8 at an average grade of 20.66%

into

766,500 tonnes grading 20.66% U3O8 at average

? (same wording as in the report)

Because, 766,500 tonnes U3O8 is incorrect, you have 766,500 uranium ore, not U3O8.

Revision as of 23:06, 29 August 2008

A good place to start ...

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Smith Ranch-Highland, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wise-uranium.org/umopwy.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Tag removed, as there was no violation. Turgan (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

?? Hey a seskatacha person tagging mining cat pages - ahhh a fellow cat tagger - hey there are not many of us around - few understand us and even fewer stay the trip so to speak. some vets of wikipedia dont even cat their new pages. so gday from down under (dont let the name get ya) and welcome on board SatuSuro 02:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. Turgan (talk) 07:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 6 - June 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 7 - July 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 12:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Invite To WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods

Hey, I notice you are member of WP: Sask. Well, I am hereby inviting you to WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods. If you decide to join, we look forward to welcoming to you to the project. Mr. C.C. (talk) 01:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 8 - August 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 22:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


Mc Arthur River

Sorry, for the mistake. I ment killoton of uranium (in some countries a ',' is used as decimal point, so that confused me). But still, the conversion is incorrect. 1 ton is 1000 kilo and 1 kilo is more than 2 pounds. So you should have more pounds than kilos IMHO Lkruijsw (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, again. I see now that it is not a metric ton. Weird, converting a non-metric value to another non-metric value Lkruijsw (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Me again, numbers are not correct. A non-metric ton is almost equal to a metric ton. So, someone made the conversion wrong. Lkruijsw (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I checked the report.

486,500 tonnes grading 17.38%!!!!

280,000 tonnes grading 26.33%!!!!

So, except for the factor 1000 (sorry, for that), my number was correct.

22:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Do, you agree in changing:

766,500 tonnes U3O8 at an average grade of 20.66%

into

766,500 tonnes grading 20.66% U3O8 at average

? (same wording as in the report)

Because, 766,500 tonnes U3O8 is incorrect, you have 766,500 uranium ore, not U3O8.