User talk:Dividends: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
welcome, reply concerning accusation |
intersting |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> |
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> |
||
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bristol_palin&diff=prev&oldid=235738402Interesting that you have few edits prior to this.] This is nothing more than attack page. It is based on a non-reliable source- a blog. It looks like nothing more than a part of a smear campaign. Think long and hard before accusing an admin of acting in bad faith. Where are the reliable sources to support these facts? Let's see them. If they exist, then we may think about the article. As the subject would have no claim to notability other than the smear, it would still fail [[WP:BLP]]. Read [[WP:V]], [[WP:RS]], and [[WP:BIO]]. Get back to me on my talk page. [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 04:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bristol_palin&diff=prev&oldid=235738402Interesting Interesting that you have few edits prior to this.] This is nothing more than attack page. It is based on a non-reliable source- a blog. It looks like nothing more than a part of a smear campaign. Think long and hard before accusing an admin of acting in bad faith. Where are the reliable sources to support these facts? Let's see them. If they exist, then we may think about the article. As the subject would have no claim to notability other than the smear, it would still fail [[WP:BLP]]. Read [[WP:V]], [[WP:RS]], and [[WP:BIO]]. Get back to me on my talk page. [[User:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#00ff00"> Dloh</font>]][[User_talk:Dlohcierekim|<font color="#bb00bb">cierekim''' </font>]] 04:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:44, 2 September 2008
|
- Interesting that you have few edits prior to this. This is nothing more than attack page. It is based on a non-reliable source- a blog. It looks like nothing more than a part of a smear campaign. Think long and hard before accusing an admin of acting in bad faith. Where are the reliable sources to support these facts? Let's see them. If they exist, then we may think about the article. As the subject would have no claim to notability other than the smear, it would still fail WP:BLP. Read WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:BIO. Get back to me on my talk page. Dlohcierekim 04:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)