Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SKYbrary (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:58, 2 September 2008

SKYbrary

Article does not assert notability. Speedy deletion (recreation of deleted material) was declined. -- JediLofty ^{Talk to me}_{Follow me} 12:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why an aviation industry wide initiative may not be mentioned on wikipedia. People interested in aviation safety should be able to learn about this initiative and find it. It is not just another website, it is respected by the industry and authorative bodies like ICAO, FSF, ... Knowledge Hunter (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems notable, simply lacking in sources. Why would this be speedy deleted? It seems notability concerns do not fall under speedy delete criteria. Vrefron (talk) 12:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:23, 2 September 2008 edit Timo Kouwenhoven (talk \| contribs) 289 edits →SKYbrary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:58, 2 September 2008 edit undo Vrefron (talk \| contribs) 144 edits keep Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I do not understand why an aviation industry wide initiative may not be mentioned on wikipedia. People interested in aviation safety should be able to learn about this initiative and find it. It is not just another website, it is respected by the industry and authorative bodies like ICAO, FSF, ... [[User:Timo Kouwenhoven\|Knowledge Hunter]] ([[User talk:Timo Kouwenhoven\|talk]]) 12:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)		I do not understand why an aviation industry wide initiative may not be mentioned on wikipedia. People interested in aviation safety should be able to learn about this initiative and find it. It is not just another website, it is respected by the industry and authorative bodies like ICAO, FSF, ... [[User:Timo Kouwenhoven\|Knowledge Hunter]] ([[User talk:Timo Kouwenhoven\|talk]]) 12:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


			''Keep'' It seems notable, simply lacking in sources. Why would this be speedy deleted? It seems notability concerns do not fall under speedy delete criteria. [[User:Vrefron\|Vrefron]] ([[User talk:Vrefron\|talk]]) 12:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)